Showing posts with label LWOP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LWOP. Show all posts

Monday, April 18, 2011

Repeal Capital Punishment in North Carolina, Says Study

BOONE, N.C. - "End the death penalty in North Carolina," suggests a recent study, which asserts that capital punishment is not a deterrent to criminals and costs the public more does than a sentence of life in prison. Another factor is the recent revelation that evidence has been mishandled by the state crime lab, possibly sending innocent people to death row, as study author Dr. Matthew Robinson, professor of government and justice studies at Appalachian State University, explains.

"It's not fixable. It's not something that we can make effective. It's not something that we can bring about justice with. It's not something we can guarantee won't be used against the innocent."

Executions in North Carolina haven't taken place since 2006, in part because of a dispute over the constitutionality of the lethal-injection process. Meanwhile, the murder rate declined by 19 percent from 2008 to 2009.

In March, Illinois became the fourth state in the last two years to repeal the death penalty. That state had halted executions in 2000 because of revelations of false convictions and evidence mishandling.

Robinson says changing the law will give the state more resources for victim services and law enforcement.

"The savings that they're going to retain in money from not having the death penalty, they're going to actually use to solve crimes and pursue violent crime."

Supporters of the death penalty say the punishment should still be available for the most violent crimes. Capital punishment is used in 34 states and in certain federal cases, but most western democracies no longer carry out executions.

The study is available at www.pscj.appstate.edu

Source: Public News Service, April 18, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Friday, March 25, 2011

Texas: House Committee Set to Hear Repeal Bill

Polunsky Unit, Texas
(Austin, Texas) — On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee will hold a public hearing on House Bill (HB) 819, which calls for the repeal of the death penalty in Texas. The hearing will take place at the State Capitol in the John H. Reagan Building (JHR) 120 (upon final adjournment/recess of the House).

“National momentum is clearly shifting in the direction of abolition,” said State Representative Jessica Farrar, the author of HB 819, along with State Representatives Marisa Marquez and Alma Allen. “Earlier this month, Illinois became the 16th state, and the 4th in recent years, to abandon the death penalty. In addition, elected officials in at least 12 other states are considering repeal legislation this year. This hearing provides members of the Texas House of Representatives with the opportunity to engage in open dialogue about the flaws and failures of our state’s capital punishment system.”

Rep. Farrar first introduced this bill – which strikes the death penalty as a sentencing option from all relevant sections of the Texas Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure and replaces it with life in prison without the possibility of parole – in 2007. In 2009, the Subcommittee on Capital Punishment of the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee considered testimony from attorneys, religious leaders, academics, and individuals impacted directly by violent crime. Among those scheduled to testify before the full committee this year are:

* Chris Castillo, National Outreach Coordinator for Murder Victims’ Families for Reconciliation. Chris’s mother, Pilar Castillo, was murdered in Houston in 1991; to date, no one has been held accountable for this crime.

* Reverend Carroll Pickett, a Presbyterian minister who served as the death house chaplain at the Walls Unit in Huntsville for 15 years and accompanied 95 men to their deaths by execution. He was present for the first U.S. execution by lethal injection, when Charlie Brooks was put to death in Texas on December 7, 1982.

* Professor Dennis Longmire, Sam Houston State University, who will speak about the cost of the death penalty.

“During this time of fiscal crisis, the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (TCADP) urges all elected officials to take a good hard look at the death penalty system and ask whether this is a good use of tax payers’ dollars when there are alternative ways to protect society and punish those who are truly guilty,” said Kristin HoulĂ©, TCADP Executive Director. “We strongly endorse HB 819 and urge the members House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee to support this important legislation.”

Source: Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (TCADP), March 25, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Illinois Governor Pat Quinn signs death penalty ban, commutes 15 death row sentences to life

SPRINGFIELD — Gov. Pat Quinn today signed into law a historic ban on the death penalty in Illinois and commuted the sentences of 15 death row inmates to life without parole.

Quinn signed the legislation in his Capitol office surrounded by longtime opponents of capital punishment in a state where flaws in the process led to the exoneration of numerous people sentenced to death.

"For me, this was a difficult decision, quite literally the choice between life and death," Quinn wrote in his signing statement. "This was not a decision to be made lightly, or a decision that I came to without deep personal reflection."

"Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it," Quinn wrote. "With our broken system, we cannot ensure justice is achieved in every case."

"For the same reason, I have also decided to commute the sentences of those currently on death row to natural life imprisonment, without the possibility of parole or release," the governor wrote.

A small group of lawmakers also was on hand, including lead sponsors Rep. Karen Yarbrough, D-Maywood, and Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago. Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago, and House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, D-Chicago also attended. Lt. Gov. Sheila Simon, who lobbied Quinn to sign the ban, was there.

The ban comes about 11 years after then-Gov. George Ryan declared a moratorium on executions after 13 condemned inmates were cleared since Illinois reinstated capital punishment in 1977. Ryan, a Republican, cited a Tribune investigative series that examined each of the state's nearly 300 capital cases and exposed how bias, error and incompetence undermined many of them.

Since then, Illinois approved reforms to the capital punishment system, including taping interrogations under a proposal forged by President Barack Obama when he served in the Illinois Senate. Only two days before leaving office in January 2003, Ryan commuted the death sentences of 164 prisoners to life in prison. Quinn and his predecessor, Rod Blagojevich, kept the moratorium in place.

In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down death penalty statutes in 40 states, including Illinois. Five years later, Illinois reinstated capital punishment, and it has been among the 35 states that currently allow executions. Illinois could join New York, New Jersey and New Mexico, all of which have done away with the death penalty in the last three years.

The death penalty ban would take effect July 1.

Quinn did not have to immediately act on the 15 death row inmates, but chose to commute their sentences to life in prison.

One of them is Brian Dugan, sentenced to death for the 1983 rape and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico, of Naperville. Dugan had been serving two life sentences for two other rape-murder cases, but his death sentence brought a major chapter of a long-running, controversial case to a close. Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez — two of three men originally charged with the girl's murder — served years on death row before they were cleared.

As Quinn campaigned for governor last fall, he held firm to the moratorium as a way to see how well the reforms are working. The governor also said he supported the death penalty for the worst crimes.

Quinn made his decision after an intense lobbying effort from those on both sides of the issue.

Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan and other prosecutors urged Quinn to veto the ban and take a hard-line stance to keep the death penalty.

The governor also heard from anti-death-penalty luminaries including South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Sister Helen Prejean, a New Orleans nun whose time spent with a condemned inmate became the basis for the movie "Dead Man Walking."

Family members of murder victims also made emotional pleas. Among them was Cindy McNamara, whose daughter, Shannon, was murdered in 2001 while attending Eastern Illinois University.

Shannon McNamara was asleep in her locked off-campus apartment when she was raped, strangled, beaten and stabbed. Her body was left in the living room. A washcloth was stuffed in her mouth.

Former EIU student Anthony Mertz was convicted, becoming the first person sent to death row after Ryan emptied it.

"We have the death penalty for a reason," Cindy McNamara wrote in a letter to Quinn. "This is the reason!"

The Tribune examination found at least 46 inmates sent to death row in cases where prosecutors used jailhouse informants to convict or condemn the defendants. The investigation also found at least 33 death row inmates had been represented at trial by an attorney who had been disbarred or suspended; at least 35 African-American inmates on death row who had been convicted or condemned by an all-white jury; and about half of the nearly 300 capital cases had been reversed for a new trial or sentencing hearing.

Source: Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Illinois Becomes 4th State in Four Years to Abandon the Death Penalty

Gov. Pat Quinn signs legislation
today ending the death penalty.
Illinois Governor Pat Quinn took the final step today in ending the death penalty and replacing it with a sentence of life without parole. The law also requires that state funds used for the death penalty be transferred to a fund for murder victims’ services and law enforcement. The ban on capital punishment comes after an 11-year moratorium on executions declared by former Republican Governor George Ryan, and makes Illinois the 16th state to repeal the death penalty. It also marks the lowest number of states with the death penalty in more than 30 years.

"The Illinois repeal is an indication of a growing national trend toward alternatives to the death penalty, and an increased focus on murder victims' families and the prevention of crime," said Richard Dieter, Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center. "In light of our current economic climate, the public has increasingly recognized that resources used for the death penalty could be diverted to higher budgetary priorities, such as law enforcement and victims’ services."

Many murder victims’ families were among the strongest supporters of the Illinois repeal. In a letter to the Illinois General Assembly, murder victims' families wrote, "A legal system that wasn’t bogged down with committing tremendous resources on capital cases could prosecute and sentence countless other crimes and take dangerous people off the streets before they commit murder. Dollars saved could be put toward counseling for victims of crime or other services we desperately need as we attempt to get on with our lives." The letter was signed by more than 30 individuals who had loved ones murdered in Illinois.

The high costs of the death penalty were influential in the passage of the repeal. Conservative Republican Senator Dan Duffy of Lake Barrington said, "We have spent over $100 million of taxpayer money defending and prosecuting death row cases. The death penalty does not make our society safer, I believe. It has been an ineffective and expensive use of our scarce resources."

In the last few months, the death penalty has been under scrutiny in other states as well. Days after the Illinois General Assembly voted for the repeal, Ohio Supreme Court Justice Paul E. Pfeifer, who as a Republican state legislator played an influential role in shaping the state’s current death penalty statute, stated: “I have concluded that it is exceedingly difficult for this statute to be administered in a fair and just way… Gov. [John] Kasich and the governors after him, I believe, need to consider commuting all of those sentences to life in prison without the possibility of parole, and I think it's time for Ohio to at least entertain the discussion of whether or not we are well served by having a death penalty."

Across the country, use of the death penalty is declining as states are using alternative punishments like life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Death sentences in the United States have dropped by over 60% since the mid-90s. A recent poll conducted by Lake Research Partners showed that 61% of U.S. voters chose various alternative sentences over the death penalty as the punishment for murder. The same poll also listed the death penalty last in a list of priorities for state spending.

Since 1976, Illinois has carried out 12 executions. In the same period, 20 inmates have been exonerated from the state’s death row, the 2nd highest number in the United States. In 2003, 3 years after the moratorium was imposed, Governor Ryan issued a blanket commutation, reducing the sentences of 167 death row inmates to life and pardoning 4 inmates. Since then, Illinois has had 2 different commissions to study the death penalty and has implemented some reforms, yet continues to face an error-prone and costly system.

In the meantime, use of the death penalty has declined sharply in Illinois. In the 1990s, the state averaged over 10 death sentences a year. In 2009 and 2010, the state imposed only 1 death sentence each year.

Illinois is the 4th state in the last 4 years to abandon the death penalty. New Mexico and New Jersey voted to abolish the death penalty in 2009 and 2007, respectively. New York’s death penalty law was declared unconstitutional in 2004, and the last person was removed from death row in 2007. More states are expected to introduce legislation to repeal the death penalty in 2011, including possibly Connecticut, Kansas and Maryland.

Source: The Death Penalty Information Center is a non-profit organization serving the media and the public with analysis and information on issues concerning capital punishment. DPIC was founded in 1990 and prepares in-depth reports, issues press releases, conducts briefings for the media, and serves as a resource to those working on this issue. DPIC is widely quoted and consulted by all those concerned with the death penalty. March 9, 2011


Statement of Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights

Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights congratulates Illinois Governor Quinn on signing into law the recently passed legislation abolishing the state's death penalty. We applaud the state's decision to redirect funds formerly spent on the death penalty to services for families of homicide victims and training of law enforcement personnel. As family members of murder victims, we know that each homicide is a theft of a unique, irreplaceable, deeply loved human life, representing a world of devastation for the victim’s surviving families.

A commitment to helping these victims' families and law enforcement personnel who work to protect us is a positive step forward for Illinois.

Source: MVFHR, March 9, 2011


Community of Sant’Egidio: 'Illinois has joined the world of civilization'

It is the 16th American state in which killing is not sanctioned by law

The Community of Sant’Egidio invites Governor Pat Quinn and a delegation of the state’s House of Representatives and Senate, along with American abolition activists, to celebrate the historic event at the Coliseum in Rome

Illinois became the 16th American state to have abolished the death penalty today after Governor Pat Quinn signed the bill approved by the two houses of the State Assembly. It was an exceptional and historic day in the United States. A ten-year process leading to a stop to executions in Chicago’s state thus drew to a close, with a large bipartisan majority confirming that the death penalty is an irremediably pernicious instrument for the judicial system.

On January 6, 2011, the House of Representatives of the state of Illinois voted 60-54 in favor of the definitive abolition of capital punishment. 5 days later, on January 11, the State Senate approved the proposal with a 32-25 vote. All that was needed was the endorsement of Governor Pat Quinn, who after weighing all of the elements at his disposal put his signature on the historic document.

Illinois is the third American state to have repudiated the death penalty in the last 4 years, following New Jersey and New Mexico. This unprecedented acceleration shows how the death penalty in the United States is in difficulty and is destined to become a weapon of the past. The development of historic dimensions came just a few weeks after a stop was put to the production of sodium thiopental one of the substances used in the U.S. for lethal injection, following a campaign spearheaded by the Community of Sant’Egidio and major anti-death penalty organizations, from Reprieve to Hands off Cain, and aided by the British and Italian governments.

The Community of Sant’Egidio closely followed the campaign launched the Illinois Coalition Against the Death Penalty, coordinated by Jeremy Schroeder, as well as the initiatives of the entire American abolitionist movement It plans to celebrate the abolition of the death penalty in Illinois with a special event in Rome: the lighting of the Coliseum, international symbol of the global battle for a system of justice that respects human life at all times.

The development marks a decisive step toward abolition of the death penalty in the whole United States. In 2010 there was the lowest number of executions in the country since 1999: 46, representing a 12 % drop since the year before. 2010 was also the year in which the lowest number of death sentences were handed down in the United States since 1976: 114, 2/3 less than 15 years earlier, 1996, a record year for death sentences.

An unmistakable trend, a progressive structural decline, confirmed by the recent electoral victories of governors publicly opposed to capital punishment in California, New York State and Massachusetts. In Texas, which holds the record with 17 executions, there were less than 10 death sentences handed down. For the first time, an American judge challenged the constitutionality of the death penalty.

Precedents:

At the end of January 2000 former Governor George Ryan, a Republican, suspended all executions after it was shown that thirteen death sentences had been commuted since 1976, the year the death penalty was officially reinstated at the federal level, because the prisoners were proven innocent. That was 1 more prisoner than the 12 death row convicts proven guilty. These numbers represented an evident anomaly for capital punishment in the large American state, a manifest gap also present in all of the other states which maintain the death penalty.

The commission created by Ryan to shed full light on the dynamics of capital sentences in Illinois came to the conclusion, after 2 years of study, that no penal system can ever be so perfect as to rule out sensational judicial error. The death penalty, with its definitive and irreparable characteristic, thus inherently represents a premise for an extremely unjust punishment. Not only that. The commission also discovered how external factors, such as ethnic identity, social class, geography, the emotional susceptibility of public opinion, the ineptitude of defense lawyers, affect the use of the death penalty in the sentencing process.

In January 2003, near the end of his mandate, Governor Ryan commuted 167 death sentences to life imprisonment after discovering the large number of errors made in the respective trials. It was the 1st widespread amnesty ever declared in American death rows. Ryan’s successors kept the moratorium in effect. It was shown that it cost the state over 100 million dollars to support the few dozen remaining inmates on death row. Even for this reason alone, a growing number of American states are wondering if it is worthwhile to pursue the path of legal assassination.

Illinois “is no longer in the company of countries which commit the worst violation of human rights: it has joined the world of civilization, putting an end to the suppression of innocent lives”, commented Senator Kwame Raoul, one of the key sponsors of the anti-death penalty bill.

Source: Sant'Egidio, March 9, 2011


Capital punishment in the United States

The governor of Illinois on Wednesday signed a bill banning the death penalty in the state. The following are some facts and figures about the death penalty in the United States since 1977, when executions resumed following the lifting of a ban on the practice by the U.S. Supreme Court the previous year.

* There have been 1,242 executions in the United States since 1977. The peak year was 1999, when 98 were carried out, while no inmates were put to death in 1978 and 1980. The number of executions dropped 12 % last year to 46. 8 people have been executed so far this year.

* The year 2009, the last for which data is available, saw 112 death sentences imposed, the lowest number over the past three decades. The peak year was 1996 when 315 were handed down.

* The death penalty is sanctioned by 34 of the 50 states and the U.S. government and military -- not counting Illinois, where the ban will take effect July 1. Lethal injection is the main method used by all of the death penalty states.

* The Death Penalty Information Center said there have been 138 exonerations of death row inmates since 1973.

* Texas has been by far the most active death penalty state in the post-1976 era, with 466 executions. Virginia is a distant 2nd at 108.

* In 2008, the United States ranked fourth in the world in the number of executions carried out with 37. China carried out by far the most with 1,718, followed by Iran with 346, Saudi Arabia with 102, the United States, Pakistan with 36, and Iraq with 34.

Source: Reuters, March 9, 2011


Scott Turow: The conservative argument to abolish the death penalty

This week's abolition of the death penalty in Illinois is commonly viewed as a triumph for progressives. But some of the most persuasive arguments for doing away with capital punishment basically reflect conservative views. The last decade has seen many noted conservatives like George Will, Richard Viguerie and L. Brent Bozell III emerge as death-penalty opponents. One reason that abolition became a political possibility here was not simply because it attracted Republican votes in the House and the Senate, but because many conservatives have grown more ambivalent about the issue and less fierce in their opposition.

Here are some of the leading conservative arguments for ending executions.

The death penalty is one more government program that's failed.

This oft-quoted observation is an elaboration on comments and more than a clever turn of phrase by former Illinoisan, George Will, perhaps the nation's leading conservative columnist.

Illinois reinstituted capital punishment in 1977, after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down all prior statutory schemes as unconstitutionally arbitrary and capricious. We have now conducted a 33-year experiment in seeing whether death sentences can be meted out in a rational, proportionate fashion that has clearly failed.

I was a member of the 14-person Commission on Capital Punishment appointed by then-Gov. George Ryan in 2000 to study the death penalty. I started out ambivalent, because I knew there will always be certain murders and killers who will cry out for this ultimate form of retribution. But after two years I came to realize that we will never construct a capital system that functions with anything resembling fairness.

Despite decades of legislation and litigation aimed at establishing procedural bulwarks, the imposition of the death penalty in Illinois remained haphazard. Studies authorized by the commission found that, in Illinois, defendants were five times more likely to be sentenced to death if they committed their crimes in rural areas, as opposed to cities; twice as likely to be sentenced to death if they killed a woman; and 21/2 times more likely to be capitally sentenced for the murder of a white person, as compared to an African-American.

Worst of all is the institutional propensity to sentence innocent people to death. Since 1977, 20 people have been sentenced to death in our state only to be legally absolved of the murders that put them on death row. This reflects what I refer to as the paradox of capital punishment. We have lived with the illusion that we can reserve capital punishment for the so-called "worst of the worst," the most heinous, brutal or repetitive murders. What we have failed to realize is that those very crimes stir our deepest anxieties and outrage, and thus are hardest to deal with in the kind of rational, highly deliberative way that taking a life should require. As a result, police, prosecutors, judges and juries too often have engaged in a rush to judgment that ignores the presumption of innocence and has led now and then to the law's ultimate nightmare, condemning the innocent.

For conservatives who believe government is too large, too inefficient and too unwieldy to deliver health care, or even the mail for that matter, it should come as no surprise that government efforts to justly select those worthy of death has been a moral disaster.

The death penalty is a waste of money.

Study after study has shown that the death penalty costs far more than sentencing defendants irrevocably to life in prison without parole. That may seem counterintuitive because executions, of course, shorten prisoners lives. But the costs before that point overwhelm those savings. Most of the money is spent dealing with people like me — lawyers. Everyone recognizes that in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's famous phrase, "death is different." We want to be sure that the condemned have enjoyed every legal right before they die, and as a result we have pyramided costs: 2 defense lawyers at trial —almost always government paid because capital defendants are overwhelmingly poor — and prosecutors to match them. Then there are the endless parade of appeals and post-conviction proceedings, which typically cost the state money for more than a decade.

Of course, if the death penalty clearly served a practical purpose like saving lives, these increased costs might be worth it. But in Illinois we have experienced a steady decline in our murder rate since Gov. Ryan first declared the moratorium on executions in January 2000 that has remained in place since. Murders in the vast majority of cases are impulsive acts by people who give no thought to getting caught. Thus the idea of deterrence is largely phantom. In a state that is now $15 billion in debt we cannot afford to throw good dollars after bad on a system that exists only to do a botched job of vindicating citizens' sense of moral outrage.

The death penalty is incomaptible with the notion of limited government.

In western Europe, all of our allies have outlawed the death penalty, most them taking that step after World War II. The reason was not so much popular opposition as historical experience. In Germany, Hitler had come to power as the result of his election, and proceeded to enact a series of tyrannical laws. The fact that the horrors of the World War II sprang directly from a democracy run amok persuaded European intellectuals and politicians that the state should never have the lawful power to kill.

In the United States, we are cheerfully oblivious to those risks and with good reason. From 1998 to 2001, for example, we saw one president impeached, another empowered without a popular majority, and our nation attacked by a pernicious foreign force; never once in any of those crises did we see troops in the street. The extraordinary durability of the American democracy is one of our greatest achievements, but it is naive to believe in Sinclair Lewis' phrase that it can't happen here. The conservative-libertarian view that says that the powers of government must be strictly limited supports drawing a clear line prohibiting a democratic government from ever lawfully killing any of the citizens from whom it draws power. That way a regime that vanished its political enemies or executed despised minorities would mark itself, whatever the legal rigamorole, as an outlaw.

At the end of the day, Illinois' abolition of capital punishment is part of an evolving national recognition that the death penalty is truly un-American.

Source: Scott F. Turow, a Chicago attorney and best-selling author, was a member of the Commission on Capital Punishment; Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Statement from Governor Pat Quinn on Senate Bill 3539

Today I have signed Senate Bill 3539, which abolishes the death penalty in Illinois.
For me, this was a difficult decision, quite literally the choice between life and death. This was not a decision to be made lightly, or a decision that I came to without deep personal reflection.
Since the General Assembly passed this bill, I have met or heard from a wide variety of people on both sides of the issue. I have talked with prosecutors, judges, elected officials, religious leaders from around the world, families of murder victims, people on death row who were exonerated and ordinary citizens who have taken the time to share their thoughts with me. Their experiences, words and opinions have made a tremendous impact on my thinking, and I thank everyone who reached out on this matter.
After their guidance, as well as much thought and reflection, I have concluded that our system of imposing the death penalty is inherently flawed. The evidence presented to me by former prosecutors and judges with decades of experience in the criminal justice system has convinced me that it is impossible to devise a system that is consistent, that is free of discrimination on the basis of race, geography or economic circumstance, and that always gets it right.
As a state, we cannot tolerate the executions of innocent people because such actions strike at the very legitimacy of a government. Since 1977, Illinois has seen 20 people exonerated from death row. Seven of those were exonerated since the moratorium was imposed in 2000. That is a record that should trouble us all. To say that this is unacceptable does not even begin to express the profound regret and shame we, as a society, must bear for these failures of justice.
Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it. With our broken system, we cannot ensure justice is achieved in every case. For the same reason, I have also decided to commute the sentences of those currently on death row to natural life imprisonment, without the possibility of parole or release.
I have found no credible evidence that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on the crime of murder and that the enormous sums expended by the state in maintaining a death penalty system would be better spent on preventing crime and assisting victims’ families in overcoming their pain and grief.
To those who say that we must maintain a death penalty for the sake of the victims’ families, I say that it is impossible not to feel the pain of loss that all these families share or to understand the desire for retribution that many may hold. But, as I heard from family members who lost loved ones to murder, maintaining a flawed death penalty system will not bring back their loved ones, will not help them to heal and will not bring closure to their pain. Nothing can do that. We must instead devote our resources toward the prevention of crime and the needs of victims’ families, rather than spending more money to preserve a flawed system.
The late Cardinal Joseph Bernadin observed, “[i]n a complex, sophisticated democracy like ours, means other than the death penalty are available and can be used to protect society.” In our current criminal justice system, we can impose extremely harsh punishments when warranted. Judges can impose sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Where necessary and appropriate, the state can incarcerate convicted criminals in maximum security prisons. These means should be sufficient to satisfy our need for retribution, justice and protection.
As Governor, I took an oath to uphold our state’s Constitution and faithfully execute our laws. Honoring that oath often requires making difficult decisions, but I have found none to be as difficult as the one I made today. I recognize that some may strongly disagree with this decision, but I firmly believe that we are taking an important step forward in our history as Illinois joins the 15 other states and many nations of the world that have abolished the death penalty.


Source: Illinois Government News Network, March 9, 2011


Ryan hails death penalty abolition, calling it ‘a long time coming'

Former Gov. George Ryan, who fought aggressively to abolish the death penalty after he left office — and who issued the moratorium against state executions when he was governor — dispatched this exclusive message to the Sneed column after Gov. Quinn signed historic legislation ending executions in Illinois.

“It’s been a long time coming,” said Ryan, who is now serving a sentence for public corruption at a federal prison in Indiana.

“I’m so glad the legislation has finally passed and Gov. Quinn signed the bill. It’s the result of all the good work of those who fought long and hard in advance of anything I did to help bring this about. I just hope more states join in as well as the federal government.

“We now know with a moral certainty an innocent person will not be put to death in Illinois. I want to thank Gov. Quinn for making the right call."

Ryan’s son, Homer, who talked to his father Wednesday evening, told Sneed: “I was with my dad the night he made his decision to place a moratorium on executions in Illinois. This was not an easy decision, but it came down simply to killing an innocent person. There are flaws in every system but this is what really bothered him."

“I’m sure George was absolutely elated,” said Rob Warden, executive director of Northwestern University’s Center on Wrongful Convictions. “It was very gracious of Gov. Quinn to give George credit during his press conference,” added Warden.

A somber note: “But you know . . . even though I’m absolutely elated and never thought I’d see this happen in my lifetime, there is something very surreal about it,” said Warden. “It all happened so quickly and without much [fanfare]."

Source: Chicago Sun-Times, March 9, 20011


Gov. Pat Quinn turned to Bible and writings of late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin for difficult death penalty decision


Gov. Pat Quinn turned to the Bible for wisdom. He drew strength from the writings of the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin. And he pored over the impassioned pleas from families of murder victims who begged him to give them a chance at closure.

Finally, after 2 months of struggling with what he said is the hardest decision he's had to make as governor, Quinn decided over the weekend to abolish the death penalty in Illinois and clear out death row.

"It is impossible to create a perfect system, free of all mistakes," Quinn said Wednesday, moments after signing the death penalty ban into law. "I think it's the right and just thing to abolish the death penalty and punish those who commit heinous crimes — evil people — with life in prison without parole or any chance of release."

The governor conceded he talked to few of the families of victims of the 15 murderers on death row, and he grasped for ways to console them.

"There are no words in the English language, or any language, to ease your pain," Quinn said soberly. "I want to tell them, it's impossible, I'm sure, to ever be healed. But we want to tell all of the family members, the family of Illinois … we want to be with you. You're not alone in your grief."

It was a legacy moment for Quinn, whose historic action might end up as the foremost achievement of a governor previously noteworthy for his succession of the impeached Rod Blagojevich.

Newly elected to his own term, Quinn's decision also caps a strong liberal shift for a state that had long been known for centrist, pragmatic politics. In the last few months, Democrats led by Quinn have imposed a major income-tax increase, legalized civil unions for same-sex couples and taken the death penalty off the books.

The political impact of those measures will play out in the coming years. Quinn already is being criticized by lawmakers and prosecutors who point out that violent criminals can now kill police officers and murder multiple victims without fear of losing their own lives.

Rep. Dennis Reboletti said the "big winners" were murderers on death row.

"The people of the state of Illinois aren't the winners," said Reboletti, R-Elmhurst.

A man of Catholic faith, Quinn cited Bernardin's own words: "In a complex, sophisticated democracy like ours, means other than the death penalty are available and can be used to protect society."

Life sentences to maximum security prisons, Quinn said, "should be sufficient to satisfy our need for retribution, justice and protection."

The governor called it impossible to create a justice system "free of all discrimination with respect to race or economic circumstances or geography" in a state where 102 separate state's attorneys impose different standards. And he weighed what's the appropriate justice for the worst killers against how Illinois exonerated 20 people once "in grave danger" of facing an irreversible punishment.

Pressed for a deeper explanation, Quinn acknowledged that child killer John Wayne Gacy, the poster boy for why Illinois has used the death penalty, committed the heinous crimes of an "evil man."

But Quinn said a system that risks killing an innocent man "cannot stand."

One of those whose sentence was commuted is Brian Dugan, sentenced to death for the 1983 rape and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico, of Naperville. Dugan had been serving 2 life sentences for 2 other rape-murder cases, but his death sentence for Nicarico's murder had seemingly brought a measure of closure to a saga seared into the collective minds of Chicago-area residents.

Yet that chapter did not end without exposing overwhelming human mistakes. Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez — two of three men originally charged with the girl's murder — served years on death row before they were cleared.

Quinn signed the bill in his office with only a handful of leading supporters, including the chief sponsors from each chamber, Rep. Karen Yarbrough, D-Maywood, and Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago. The two clutched pens Quinn used to sign the legislation as they hugged behind the governor's wooden desk.

Tears welled in Raoul's eyes several minutes after Quinn defended his decision.

"God bless the state of Illinois. The light of God is shining," Raoul said. "Shining positively upon our state. This is a historic day. We enter into this business trying to have some impact on lives. There's no greater impact that you can have than to do something that will save a life."

Yarbrough said she once supported the death penalty but that the exonerations serve as a "painful and stirring reminder that death is an absolute penalty. Once imposed, there is no second chance, no reversal and no way to correct a mistake."

Exonerated former inmate Gordon "Randy" Steidl, who spent 17 years in prison, including 12 on death row, was among the death penalty opponents who praised Quinn.

"He made a decision today, a moral, righteous decision, when he realized that there are flaws in this system that almost took my life and 19 other men in Illinois," Steidl said.

Not everyone at the Capitol cheered, given the legislation cleared the General Assembly with only a few votes to spare in the waning days of a lame-duck session in January. Death penalty proponents already are seeking to reinstate capital punishment.

Rep. Jim Durkin, R-Western Springs, predicted Quinn's actions would haunt him if he plans to run for re-election in 2014.

Quinn chose to focus on the arguments lawmakers gave when they approved the ban. He also deflected questions on how he campaigned last fall as a death penalty supporter. Quinn had kept in place the moratorium first imposed by Republican adversary and predecessor Gov. George Ryan, who cleared death row in 2003 by commuting to life in prison the death sentences for more than 160 inmates.

But Quinn hesitated when asked to draw comparisons between his actions and those of Ryan, who is serving time in federal prison for corruption. The governor said the 2 each followed their consciences.

"I think God wants you to do it that way," Quinn said.

Source: Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Quinn ends death row at Pontiac prison

Pontiac Correctional Center
Gov. Pat Quinn signaled the end of Pontiac Correctional Center's role as home to Illinois' death row Wednesday.

Although state prison officials are not sure what will happen to the 22 cells reserved for condemned prisoners, the governor's decision to abolish the death penalty and commute the sentences of the 15 men on who reside there will symbolically and physically alter the makeup of the 140-year-old lockup.

Quinn's landmark move also will end Dwight Correctional Center's role as the designated death row for women and eliminate Tamms Correctional Center as the home of the state's execution chamber, last used in 1999 when Andrew Kokoraleis was executed by lethal injection.

The formal abolition will go into effect on July 1, meaning death row will technically remain in place until then.

The 15 residents of the gallery whose sentences were commuted to life in prison without the possibility of release eventually will be moved into other units.

"I know they will stay in a maximum-security facility," said Illinois Department of Corrections spokeswoman Sharyn Elman.

John Maki, executive director of the John Howard Association, a prison watchdog group, was on a team surveying Pontiac on Jan. 11 -- the day the Illinois Senate approved the death penalty abolition.

He said condemned prisoners were curious about what the abolition would mean for their sentences, which are served in isolation from the general prison population.

Elman could provide no timetable for when the prisoners would be moved out of their current cells, but Maki said the inmates should be prepared for significant changes, including possibly having to share a cell with another inmate.

"Their life in prison arguably gets worse," Maki said.

At least one state lawmaker said Pontiac officials should be given clear directions on what to do with the inmates.

"Those correctional facilities need to know what to do with those death row inmates and transition them to wherever they will be housed to comply with the law as it stands now," said state Rep. Jason Barickman, R-Champaign, who represents Pontiac.

Elman said it is too early to know how the emptied space will be used. For the most part, the section set aside for condemned inmates looks similar to the rest of the 1,650-inmate facility.

"It's basically indistinguishable from other parts of the prison," said Maki.

There is no official space dedicated to a female version of death row at Dwight because there were no women sentenced to death at the time of Quinn's action.

If there were, however, Elman said they too would be separated by sight and sound from other inmates.

Source: Bloomington Pantagraph, March 9, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Friday, February 11, 2011

URGENT APPEAL for Timothy Adams due to be executed in Texas on 22 Feb. 2011

Timothy Adams, a 42-year-old African American man, is scheduled to be executed in Texas on 22 February. He was sentenced to death for the murder of his young son in 2002. Three of the 12 jurors who voted for death at his trial in 2003 are among those now appealing for clemency.

Timothy Adams
Timothy (Tim) Adams shot his 19-month-old son Timothy ("TJ") during a stand-off with police in Houston, Texas, on 20 February 2002. After surrendering, he gave police a statement admitting to the murder. He pleaded guilty at his trial. The jury convicted him, and after a sentencing phase voted that, even though he had no prior criminal record, he would likely commit future acts of violence that would "constitute a continuing threat to society" – a prerequisite for a death sentence in Texas – and that there was insufficient mitigating evidence to warrant a life sentence.

Although the defense lawyers presented a number of character witnesses at the sentencing, they presented only one family member, the defendant's mother. Other relatives of Tim Adams – who are also members of the murder victim's family – are now appealing for clemency. For example, Tim Adams's father – the grandfather of the victim – has said: "Losing TJ was especially hard for me... However, I cannot imagine losing my son to this tragedy as well... I do not know what I will do if we lose Tim". The brother of Tim Adams has said "It's hard to explain why Tim did what he did... It was totally out of character... I still have a strong relationship with him. I often break down when I leave the prison after our visits. I cannot imagine losing my brother". His sister states: "It's going to affect my family in a bad way if he is executed. I would never wish this on anyone, even my worst enemy... This would just be another huge loss to our family". Tim Adams has a 23-year-old son from a previous relationship who has said: "I can't put my finger on why my father would do something like that. Yet, my father was very loving and taught me right from wrong when I was growing up. He was a good father. He is not a bad person. I wish I had had the opportunity to say something in support of my father at his trial".

Three of the jurors from the original trial are also supporting clemency. One of them has said that she initially voted for a life sentence, but "felt pressured by the other jurors to change my vote". She said that she has "carried the guilt around for years knowing that I sentenced Adams, a man who had done wrong but who was otherwise a good, religious, and hard-working person, to death". Another former juror recalled that "Adams was so remorseful during the trial, and I could tell that he was hurting a lot". However, she said that he too had felt "pressured" by other jurors "into believing that Adams was a cold-hearted man" and had voted for death. Both jurors said that they had learned more about Tim Adams since the trial that confirmed their original leaning to vote for a life sentence.

Tim Adams is reported not to have committed a single disciplinary infraction during his eight years on death row.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A few days before the 20 February 2002 shooting in Houston, Tim Adams's wife had moved out of their flat, taking the baby with her. On 20 February, she returned to the apartment to collect her belongings. Confronted by her husband, she telephoned the police. Tim Adams fired a shot at her, and she fled the home, leaving the child behind. In the ensuing stand-off, Tim Adams told police that he was suicidal and would kill himself if anyone tried to enter the apartment. He was eventually talked into surrendering. His young son had already been shot.

Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases, unconditionally, regardless of the crime or the offender. To end the death penalty is to abandon a destructive, diversionary and divisive public policy that is not consistent with widely held values. It not only runs the risk of irrevocable error, it is also costly, in social and psychological terms as well as to the public purse (a fact which is drawing increasing public concern in the USA in the current economic climate). It has not been proved to have a unique deterrent effect. It tends to be applied in a discriminatory way, on grounds of race and class. It denies the possibility of reconciliation and rehabilitation. It promotes simplistic responses to complex human problems, rather than pursuing explanations that could inform positive strategies. It diverts resources that could be better used to work against violent crime and assist those affected by it. The death penalty extends the suffering of the victim's family to that of the condemned prisoner.

Today, 139 countries are abolitionist in law or practice, a clear majority. Such countries have concluded either that the death penalty is unnecessary, or that it is incompatible with modern standards of justice, or both. While international law recognizes that some countries retain the death penalty, this acknowledgment of present reality should not be invoked "to delay or to prevent the abolition of capital punishment", in the words of Article 6.6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In 2007, 2008 and 2010, the United Nations General Assembly passed resolutions calling for a worldwide moratorium on executions, pending abolition.

There have been 1,239 executions in the USA since judicial killing resumed there in 1977, including five so far this year. Of the 464 prisoners put to death in Texas (37 per cent of the national total), 115 were convicted in Harris County, where Tim Adams was sentenced to death. If Harris County was a state, it would account for more executions than any other state in the USA apart from the rest of Texas. See USA: One county, 100 executions: Harris County and Texas - a lethal combination, July 2007, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/AMR51/125/2007/en; also USA: Too much cruelty, too little clemency: Texas nears 200th execution under current governor, April 2009, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/AMR51/057/2009/en. There have been 225 executions in Texas since Governor Rick Perry took office in December 2000.

Arbitrariness, discrimination and error mark the death penalty in the USA, along with its inescapable cruelty. Public and political support for the death penalty has weakened in recent years, possibly a result of an erosion of belief in its deterrence value, an increased awareness of the frequency of wrongful convictions in capital cases, and a greater confidence that public safety can be guaranteed by life prison terms rather than death sentences. In 2008, Senior Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens revealed that he had decided, after more than three decades on the country's highest court, that the death penalty was a cruel waste of time. "I have relied on my own experience", he wrote, "in reaching the conclusion that the imposition of the death penalty represents the pointless and needless extinction of life with only marginal contributions to any discernible social or public purposes". Since retiring from the Supreme Court in June 2010, he has said that there was one vote during his nearly 35 years on the Court that he regretted – his vote with the majority in Gregg v. Georgia in 1976 that allowed executions to resume in the USA. See also USA: A learning curve, towards a 'more perfect world', October 2010, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/AMR51/095/2010/en 

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please send appeals to arrive as quickly as possible:
- Acknowledging the seriousness of the crime for which Tim Adams was sentenced to death;
- Noting that three of the jurors are calling for commutation of the death sentence;
- Calling on the authorities to recognize the suffering that execution causes family members;
- Urging the parole board to recommend to Governor Perry that he commute the death sentence;
- Calling on Governor Perry to do all in his power and influence to stop this execution.

APPEALS TO:

Clemency Section, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
8610 Shoal Creek Blvd.
Austin, TX 78757-6814
USA
Fax 512 467 0945
Salutation: Dear Board members

Governor Rick Perry
Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 12428
Austin, TX 78711-2428
USA
Fax: 1 512 463 1849
Salutation: Dear Governor

PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY.

Click here to sign an online clemency petition (You must live in the US to sign this petition).
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Illinois: If gov bans death penalty, 15 on death row may die

Beyond deciding whether to abolish Illinois’ death penalty, Gov. Quinn faces a moral dilemma involving the fate of the 15 condemned killers now on death row.

The death-penalty repeal bill that narrowly passed the General Assembly last month would ban executions going forward. But it wouldn’t apply retroactively to those already sentenced to death, including condemned killers like Brian Dugan, who was convicted of the 1983 murder of Naperville 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico.

If Quinn signs the death-penalty abolition legislation, should he also spare the state’s current Death Row population from execution and commute their sentences to life in prison without parole?

Or, should he simply postpone a decision until a potential 2nd term or place it in the lap of a future governor since none of the inmates is likely to exhaust his appeals and face death until sometime after 2014?

On Friday, Quinn would not divulge his plans for the death-penalty legislation or whether he is considering a commutation for the 15 inmates now awaiting a death sentence as part of a possible bill signing.

"I'm going to make a decision on everything at the right time. It won’t be that long from now,” Quinn said during an appearance in Downstate Normal. “But I do think it’s important to have a period of reflection and review, and that’s what we’re doing."

But the lead legislative architects of the repeal and the Catholic Conference of Illinois believe Quinn should set aside the death sentences for everyone on death row, as former Gov. George Ryan did in early 2003, and commute the inmates’ sentences to life in prison without parole.

"That inconsistency just doesn't make sense," said Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago), the repeal bill’s chief Senate sponsor. “Then you start killing people in a state that decided not to kill people."

Raoul said he does not know the full details of the 15 convictions or the investigations. But he said wrongful convictions have happened in the past — 20, he said — and will continue to happen in the future.

The caveat in the bill exists because the Legislature cannot constitutionally change a convicted person’s sentence retroactively, Raoul said. The Legislature can only affect future sentencing.

Rep. Karen Yarbrough (D-Chicago), and chief House sponsor of the bill, said life without parole would be a harsher sentence than execution for those unaffected by her legislation.

"I hear these stories about cable TVs and country clubs,” she said. “That’s not Illinois prisons. And death would be a relief."

Others, however, believe Quinn should leave intact the death sentences for those already convicted and sentenced since Ryan’s historic mass commutation.

One of those voices pushing to leave the death sentences in place comes from an unlikely source: Rolando Cruz, a former Death Row inmate who was wrongly convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of Nicarico. Cruz was later exonerated after Dugan confessed to the crime.

"They don’t deserve their lives,” Cruz told the Chicago Sun-Times, referring most notably to child killers like Dugan now on Death Row. "There is no proof that they are innocent. Execute them."

Quinn's election opponent, Sen. Bill Brady (R-Bloomington), who voted no on the bill, said modern technology and research, like the advancement of DNA testing, strengthens the death-penalty system. Because of it, no reason exists to diminish the sentences of the current inmates, he said.

"No one has given me any evidence to show that they were unjustly convicted,” Brady said.

Quinn has until mid-March to act on the legislation.

Source: Chicago Sun-Times, Feb. 8, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Durbin: States should not impose death penalty

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — States should not impose the death penalty because of the difficulty in administering it fairly, although the federal government should retain that authority in cases involving terrorism or treason that endanger many lives, U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin said.

Durbin told The (Springfield) State Journal-Register that he had always supported the death penalty, but has come to believe that "life in prison is penalty enough." He said that view was influenced partly by those of the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun and retired Justice John Paul Stevens.

"They both at the end of their careers came to the same conclusion: that after a lifetime of supporting the death penalty and trying to make it fair, that we had largely failed as a nation, and I cannot escape their wisdom on this issue," said Durbin, the second-ranking member in the Senate. "I really believe that on reflection, the burden is now on those supporting the death penalty to prove its fairness."

Although his comments come as Gov. Pat Quinn decides whether to sign a bill passed by the Illinois General Assembly that would end the death penalty in Illinois, Durbin said he is not trying to tell Quinn what he should do.

"I will not lobby him, because I think it's a matter of conscience," Durbin said.

Quinn supports the death penalty but has also kept in place the moratorium on capital punishment instituted in 2000 by former Gov. George Ryan, after the death sentences of 13 men were overturned and Ryan concluded the state's death penalty system wasn't working.

In some of those 13 cases, evidence showed the suspects were innocent. In others, the trials were deemed unfair or confessions were found to be coerced by abusive police. Since then, the number of overturned capital cases has risen to 20.

Prosecutors say significant reforms have been put in place since the moratorium was imposed, including more money and training for defense attorneys, videotaped interrogations and easier access to DNA evidence.

Source: Chicago Tribune, January 18, 2011
______________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Ohio justice calls for end of death penalty

An Ohio Supreme Court justice who helped write the state's death penalty law 3 decades ago is calling for an end to capital punishment in the state. 

Justice Paul Pfeifer was 1 of the leading proponents of Ohio's death penalty law as a state legislator in the 1970s and 1980s. 

Pfeifer also said Tuesday that Gov. John Kasich should consider commuting the death sentences of all inmates condemned to die to life without parole. 

Pfeifer, a Republican, was chairman of the Senate Criminal Justice Committee as Ohio debated the capital punishment bill that became law in 1981. 

He says the recent decrease in death sentences is a sign society believes life sentences are punishment enough. 

Source: Associated Press, January 18, 2011

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Outgoing Tennessee Governor commutes death sentence of Harbison, pardons 22

Outgoing Gov. Phil Bredesen on Tuesday commuted a Tennessee inmate's death sentence to life in prison without parole and issued 22 pardons.

The Democratic governor acted during his last days in office to change the sentence of convicted murderer Edward Jerome Harbison.

"It's obviously a heinous crime, but when I compare it to others I don't think it rose to the level of a death penalty crime," Bredesen told The Associated Press in an exclusive interview. "So I knocked it down one notch to life without parole. And that's enough said, I guess."

Bredesen, who leaves office on Saturday, said he had discussed the commutation with Republican Gov.-elect Bill Haslam.

"He was totally fine, I think he understands completely," he said. "He thought it was appropriate even though the execution would have happened on his watch."

Bredesen also exonerated 1 man, commuted the sentences of 3 inmates and issued 22 pardons.

Harbison was convicted in Chattanooga of the 1983 slaying of Edith Russell, a woman for whom he had done handy work. He initially confessed but later claimed he was forced to do that because police threatened to arrest his girlfriend and put her children in foster care.

The exoneration erases the conviction of James Green, who was arrested in 2006 and charged with abducting and groping a child. 2 years later, the alleged victim recanted the claims and the district attorney dropped the charges. Green served more than 2 years of a 16-year sentence before he was released.

Source: Associated Press, January 11, 2011

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Missouri Governor Commutes Richard Clay's Death Sentence

Missouri's governor decided to spare a convicted murderer's life Monday, a little more than a day before the man was scheduled to die by injection for a 1994 killing.

Gov. Jay Nixon said in a statement that he was commuting the sentence for Richard Clay, 45, to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Clay was convicted of killing Randy Martindale of New Madrid in 1994 but has maintained his innocence. Nixon's statement did not explain why the governor decided to commute the sentence, and in fact said that after an exhaustive review, the governor is "convinced of Richard Clay's involvement in the senseless murder of Randy Martindale" and finds "the evidence clearly supports the jury's verdict of murder in the first degree."

Nixon spokesman Scott Holste said the written statement "will be the extent of comment from the governor or his office."

It wasn't clear if Nixon's decision had anything to do with allegations last week by the American Civil Liberties Union that Missouri cut corners on execution rehearsals because of a national shortage of sodium thiopental, one of three drugs used in most executions. The ACLU said Missouri didn't use sodium thiopental in an October rehearsal aimed at determining if staffers understood how to properly administer the drugs - possibly to stretch a dwindling supply. Corrections officials said the state was adequately prepared for the execution.

Clay's attorney, Jennifer Herndon, said she and Clay were elated by Nixon's decision, but will continue to seek a new trial.

"I've always believed he is innocent and will continue to fight," Herndon said. "This is only the first step."

In a Monday interview before Nixon announced his decision, Clay told The Associated Press he was not optimistic the governor would halt the execution because Nixon was attorney general at the time of his trial and one of Nixon's assistants, Kenny Hulshof, aided in the prosecution.

"Mr. Nixon said there were no mistakes at that time, that Mr. Hulshof did a fine job and I had a fair trial," Clay said.

A spokeswoman for Hulshof, now a private attorney, said he was out of the state and not available for comment Monday.

Riley Bock, the New Madrid County prosecutor who handled the case along with Hulshof, said he had no problem with Nixon's decision and he continues to be convinced of Clay's guilt.

"Commutation is always on the table," Bock said. "The governor, that's his job to do whatever he thinks is right. End of case."

During Nixon's 16 years as attorney general, his office defended Missouri's death penalty in numerous appeals to the state Supreme Court. It also provided assistant attorney generals to aid local prosecutors pursuing the death sentence in murders.

After Nixon won election as governor in November 2008, a coalition of death penalty critics called for a moratorium on executions so Missouri's death penalty system could be studied. A Nixon spokesman said at the time that Nixon backed the use of the death penalty and that families of victims deserved closure and justice without lengthy delays in death sentences.

Commutation requests are common but rarely granted. The previous one in Missouri drew worldwide attention.

In 1999, then-Gov. Mel Carnahan heeded the request of Pope John Paul II during the pontiff's visit to St. Louis and spared the life of Darrell Mease hours before the scheduled execution. Carnahan, a Baptist, cited "the extraordinary circumstances of the pope's request."

In the interview with AP, Clay admitted he was no Boy Scout - but said he was no killer, either.

At the time of the killing, Clay already was facing a methamphetamine-related charge. He said he decided to start selling drugs again to pay off his attorneys in that case.

On May 19, 1994, Clay and his friend, Chuck Sanders, went to the home of Stacy Martindale to sell her drugs. The three were friends and Sanders was dating Martindale, who was estranged from her husband, Randy.

Clay said Randy Martindale showed up unexpectedly at the house, saw the men there, and told them to leave or he would call police. Stacy Martindale gave them the keys to her Camaro, and the men drove off, with Sanders behind the wheel.

Sanders didn't realize the car had struck a toy in the driveway. The toy became lodged under the car and caused sparks. A New Madrid police officer saw the sparks and pulled over the Camaro.

Clay said he panicked because he had meth and marijuana with him in the car, so jumped out and ran to a flooded field where he hid through the night. He still was hiding in the swampy area the next morning when he was surrounded by police. He said it seemed like a lot of manpower for a low-level drug suspect.

When he arrived at the sheriff's office, a detective asked, "Where's the gun?" Clay said he didn't understand.

"He said, 'Mr. Clay, we've got a serious problem here. You're being charged with first-degree murder.'"

Randy Martindale had been gunned down in the bedroom of his home. Authorities alleged Stacy Martindale wanted her husband dead and unsuccessfully tried to convince Sanders to do it. Authorities said she then turned to Clay.

Clay said he doesn't know who killed Randy Martindale. Stacy Martindale was convicted of second-degree murder for her role and was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

Source: KansasCity.com, January 10, 2011

Monday, January 3, 2011

It's time for capital punishment to become Texas history

The death penalty in Texas is fraught with demonstrable error, and the people of the state seem more willing to deal with that fact than their leaders.

Events of the past year have convinced us that defendants have been executed on the basis of invalid evidence. They may or may not have been guilty, but the fact that we have convicted people based on faulty evidence leads inexorably to a horrible likelihood — that we have executed innocent people. The high number of death row prisoners eventually exonerated makes a strong case that other innocent but less fortunate prisoners have been wrongfully put to death.

We don't lose sleep over the execution of guilty murderers. But the possible or probable execution of the innocent should trouble every Texan.

The freeing of Anthony Graves after 18 years in prison, many on death row, for a false murder conviction is only the most recent example of how badly the system is broken. His ordeal underlines how long the victims of wrongful death sentences must suffer in the cases where the errors are discovered before execution.

Two men, Cameron Todd Willingham, convicted of murder by arson, and Claude Jones, convicted of murder during a robbery, were executed on the basis of evidence later shown to be questionable or false.

We are heartened by figures showing that Texas and Harris County juries are sending fewer defendants to death row. Once known as the death penalty capital of the United States, Harris County has relinquished that grim title in recent years. If Texas were a nation, it would have been among the top state executioners in the world in past decades, in the company of judicial pariahs like China and Iran.

Since executions resumed in 1976, 464 have been carried out in Huntsville. Texas still led the nation in 2010 with 17 executions, more than twice the number of runner-up Ohio. This past year juries in Texas sentenced only eight people to die, while Harris County has had only two capital punishment sentences handed down.

Legal experts attribute the drop in death judgments to the availability of a life-without-parole statute passed by the Texas Legislature in 2005, and to the escalating costs to counties of the appeals process involving capital sentences. The exoneration of 11 Texas death row residents has undoubtedly made the public - and potential jury pools - more aware of the possibility that a death sentence could be an irreversible mistake.

Still, even as Texas juries show increased restraint in utilizing capital punishment, Texas elected officials - including most jurists - seem equally determined not to examine its flaws. When District Judge Kevin Fine attempted to conduct a hearing on the constitutionality of the death penalty as practiced in Texas, Harris County District Attorney Pat Lykos first ordered her prosecutors to stand mute in court and then successfully appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to halt the hearing. More than 60 people, including former Texas Gov. Mark White, have filed a brief with the high court in support of allowing the death penalty hearing to go forward.

When the state Forensic Science Commission attempted to investigate whether Willingham was executed for the murder of his three children based on faulty arson evidence, Gov. Rick Perry replaced the commission chairman and several board members. A protracted and inconclusive investigation followed. An attempt by an Austin judge to conduct a hearing on the Willingham case has also been stymied by an appeals judge, who ruled that the jurist should have recused himself.

The accumulating evidence indicates that the current application of the death penalty in Texas involves an unacceptably high risk of killing innocent people. Yet even as the evidence of false convictions and wrongful executions piles up, only the participants at the base of the Texas criminal justice system, jury members, seem to be waking up to the reality of this evil.

Some opponents have called for a moratorium on executions in Texas until new, unspecified safeguards are in place to protect the innocent. Yet it's difficult to imagine a fail-safe route to execution.

Besides, we already have the ultimate safeguard on the books: the sentence of life without parole. Spending the rest of one's days in prison is as terrifying a deterrent to most people as quick execution. By ending state-sanctioned killing, in the future when a jury makes a mistake, resurrection won't be required to remedy it.

Source: Editorial, Houston Chronicle, January 1, 2011

Friday, December 24, 2010

Ohio only state to execute more in 2010

Ted Strickland
Ohio continued to buck a national trend on the death penalty this year, ranking second in the nation to Texas in the number of executions.

Ohio had eight men lethally injected, making it the only state to increase executions in 2010, according to the annual report by the Death Penalty Information Center, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization in Washington, D.C.

The total would have been higher had Gov. Ted Strickland not spared the lives of two convicted killers: Kevin Keith of Crawford County and Sidney Cornwell of Mahoning County.

Strickland, who will leave office Jan. 9, said yesterday that he feels "terrible" that Ohio was the only state in which executions rose this year. "It's one of the responsibilities of governing that I won't mind giving up," he said.

But Strickland also said that some murderers deserve the death penalty. "In a perfect world, we wouldn't have a death penalty," he said. "But there are some people who are so terribly damaged, so twisted and devoid of empathy for other people who, in the most calculated way, decide to do terrible things to people."

Executions in the United States in 2010 were down 12percent from last year, the center reported. The nation had 46 executions this year, down from 52 last year. This year's total was less than half of that in 1999, the report stated.

Texas had 17 executions this year, a 29percent drop from 2009.

Behind Ohio, four states - Alabama, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Virginia - each had three executions.

Only 12 states had any executions.

"Whether it's concerns about the high costs of the death penalty at a time when budgets are being slashed, the risks of executing the innocent, unfairness, or other reasons, the nation continued to move away from the death penalty in 2010," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center.

The process has been complicated not only by legal challenges but also by shortages of a critical drug, thiopental sodium. It is used exclusively in Ohio's lethal-injection process and as part of a three-drug system in other states. The sole U.S. manufacturer of the drug does not expect to resume production until spring.

Although the nation's number of new death sentences has remained about the same, Ohio added six people to Death Row this year, an increase from the trickle of new sentences in the previous few years. Ohio has 156 men and one woman on Death Row.

Still, that is a big drop from just a few years ago, when more than 200 people were awaiting execution in Ohio prisons.

Ohio's steady stream of executions, coupled with a trend toward more sentences of life in prison without the possibility of parole, has continued to trim Death Row.

Gov.-elect John Kasich, a Republican who supports capital punishment, will face reviewing two scheduled executions early in his term, in February and March.

In addition, county prosecutors have asked the Ohio Supreme Court to set execution dates in about 10 other cases. Dates are being held open monthly through the end of 2011.

Ohio is also going against a geographic trend. The center reported that, since capital punishment was restored in 1976, 82 percent of all executions in the U.S. have been in the South.

Source: The Columbus Dispatch, December 21, 2010