Showing posts with label Helen Prejean. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Helen Prejean. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Cinema and the Death Penalty

"A Short Film about Killing"
Thou Shalt Not Kill

Krzysztof Kieslowski’s fifth installment of his Dekalog series, Dekalog 5: “Thou shalt not kill.”, is an intense, sometimes unbearable, depiction of the horror of killing.

The story follows three characters who are initially separate but whose paths not unexpectedly cross as the film develops. 

Piotr is a young lawyer who is telling the story in connection with an interview for a prominent law firm. He is clean-cut, intelligent, sensitive, and committed to the highest ideals of justice. Early on in his storytelling, he reveals his strongly-held convictions opposing capital punishment.

The taxi driver is a middle-aged man who lives in the housing complex that links all the episodes of “Dekalog”. As he goes about his daily activities, he is seen to be a mean-spirited, unsympathetic character, who refuses to pick up fares who might inconvenience him, leers at pretty young girls, and finds amusement in scaring little dogs by honking his horn at them.

Jacek is an angry and alienated twenty-year-old who is aimlessly wandering about the city looking for and causing trouble wherever he goes. He throws rocks through car windshields on the freeway, scares away birds from bird-feeders, and roughs up weaker individuals when noone else is looking.

It doesn’t take long for the viewer to suspect that Jacek is going to commit a murder, and he soon chooses the hapless taxi driver as his victim. The murder scene is not brief, as it is in most films, but excruciatingly long and brutal, and it takes some time for the bludgeoned taxi driver to die. Jacek is inhuman and remorseless throughout. But we are still only halfway through the film, and another murder will occupy the second half.

"A Short Film about Killing"
Soon enough, Jacek is duly arrested and convicted of the crime, and despite the efforts of his earnest defense attorney, Piotr, Jacek is sentenced to death. The rest of the film depicts the equally inhuman machinations of the government legal and punitive system as it prepares for and executes the second murder: the execution of Jacek.

The brutality of the execution sequences has led many reviewers to view the film as primarily a statement against capital punishment. But Kieslowski has objected to this characterisation: it’s not against capital punishment, he says, it’s against killing, itself.

And to emphasize this distinction, scenarists Piesiewicz and Kieslowski have departed from the usual depiction of murder, which focuses on the victim – the injury, the suffering, the death. In this film, instead, the focus is on the brutality of the killer and the killing, irrespective of the alleged innocence of the victim.

To emphasize this focus, the victim of each of the two killings is far from being a sympathetic character. In the first half of the film, a repugnant character, the taxi driver, is killed by Jacek. We are forced to face up to the wrongfulness of this act, no matter how unlikable the victim. 

Jacek
In the second half of the film, the focus is on the societal killing-machine that carries out capital punishment. But unlike many films opposed to capital punishment which depict the victimization and wrongful execution of an essentially innocent man who was the victim of circumstances, there is absolutely no doubt or qualification about the guilt of Jacek. He is infinitely more objectionable than the taxi driver. And yet he is a human being, just as the taxi driver was. 

Piotr is granted a final half hour in Jacek’s cell just prior to his execution, and he learns a little more about Jacek. There is some suggestion revealed in this scene that Jacek’s recollections of his beloved younger sister, who had been run over and killed five years earlier, set him off in a murderous rage when he happened to see the taxi driver leering at a young woman. But this is neither an explanation nor a justification of Jacek’s heinous act – it only reminds us of the pervasiveness of human weakness and vulnerability. (Source: The Film Sufi)

Thou shalt not kill (Poland, 1988)
Director: Krzysztof Kieslowski
Screenplay: Krzysztof Kieslowski, Krzysztof Piesiewicz
Cast: Miroslaw Baka (Jacek), Krzysztof Globisz (Piotr), Jan Tesarz (Taxi-driver), Zbigniew Zapasiewicz (Police Inspector), Barbara Dziekan-Wajda (Cashier), Aleksander Bednarz, Jerzy Zass, Zdzislaw Tobiasz, Artur Barcis, Krystyna Janda, Olgierd Lukaszewicz
Extended version released as "A Short Film about Killing"
Running time:  84 minutes




Dead Man Walking

Dead Man Walking is a 1995 American film based on the book of the same name, which tells the story of Sister Helen Prejean (played by Susan Sarandon), who establishes a special relationship with Matthew Poncelet (played by Sean Penn), a prisoner on death row in Louisiana.

Matthew Poncelet (Sean Penn) has been in prison six years, awaiting his execution by lethal injection for killing a teenage couple. Poncelet, located in the Louisiana State Penitentiary, committed the crimes with a man named Carl Vitello (Michael Cullen), who received life imprisonment. As the day of his execution comes closer and closer, Poncelet asks Sister Helen (Susan Sarandon) to help him with a final appeal.

She decides to visit him, and he comes across as arrogant, sexist, and racist, not even pretending to feel any kind of remorse. Instead he affirms his innocence, insisting it was Vitello who killed the two teenagers.

Convincing an experienced attorney to take on Poncelet's case pro bono, Sister Helen tries to obtain life imprisonment for Poncelet. Over time, after many visits, she establishes a special relationship with him. At the same time, she gets to know Poncelet’s mother (Roberta Maxwell) and the victims’ families. The families don’t understand Sister Helen's efforts to help Poncelet, claiming she is "taking his side." Instead they desire "absolute justice," namely his life for the lives of their children.

Sister Helen’s application for a pardon is declined. Poncelet asks Sister Helen to be his spiritual advisor through the day of execution, and she agrees. Sister Helen tells Poncelet that his redemption is possible only if he takes responsibility for what he did.

Just before he is taken from his cell, Poncelet admits to Sister Helen that he killed the boy and raped the girl. During his execution, he appeals to the boy's parents for forgiveness and tells the girl's parents he hopes his death brings them peace. Poncelet is then executed and later given a proper burial. The murdered boy's father attends the ceremony and begins to pray with Sister Helen, ending the film. (Source: Wikipedia)

Dead Man Walking (USA, 1995)
Directed by Tim Robbins
Produced by Tim Robbins, Jon Kilik, Rudd Simmon
Written by Tim Robbins
Based on Dead Man Walking by Sister Helen Prejean C.S.J.
Cast: Susan Sarandon, Sean Penn, Robert Prosky, Lois Smith, Jack Black, Celia Weston
Running time: 122 minutes



Somebody Has to Shoot the Picture

Raymond Eames, a small-time drug dealer, has been sentenced to death for the shooting death of a policeman. After seven years of appeals are exhausted, the date of his execution arrives. His last request is that his execution in the electric chair be photographed.

Eames selects Paul Marish (Roy Scheider), a jaded Pulitzer Prize winning photographer, who is convinced by his agent to visit the small town in Georgia. Sensing a big story, Marish's agent sends in a reporter from Time magazine, and together they begin to investigate the events surrounding the murder, in a small town where emotions are high and opinions are fixed. 

When the execution is temporarily delayed, the photographer becomes investigator and uncovers some startling evidence which may prove the drug dealer innocent. 

Despite its archetypal plot -- an innocent man on death row and a reporter turned detective attempting to save the doomed convict at the eleventh hour -- "Somebody Has to Shoot the Picture" provides a very factual and highly plausible rendering of the psychological agony that death row inmates endure day after day prior to their execution. If physical torture is (almost) no longer tolerated in the U.S., psychological torture is. The film is a gripping whodunit with a political twist, yet it is first and foremost a vibrant condemnation of capital punishment and a successful demonstration of the inherent cruelty and degrading nature of the death penalty.

Somebody Has to Shoot the Picture (USA, Television film, 1990)
Directed by Frank Pierson
Written by photojournalist Doug Magee (based on his interviews with and photos of death row prisoners)
Cast: Roy Scheider as Paul Marish, Photographer, Bonnie Bedelia as Hannah McGrath, Robert Carradine as Police Sgt. Jerry Brown, Andre Braugher as Dan Weston, Time Magazine Reporter, Arliss Howard as Raymond Eames,Jay Glick as Prison chaplain, John Polce as Executioner
Running time: 104 minutes



Monster's Ball

Hank Grotowski (Billy Bob Thornton), a widower, and his son, Sonny (Heath Ledger), are corrections officers in the local prison. They reside in Georgia with Hank's ailing father, Buck (Peter Boyle), an unwavering racist whose wife committed suicide. Hank's hateful attitude toward others, strongly influenced by his father, extends to his father, his son, and members of the neighboring community.

As Hank and Sonny assist in the execution of convicted murderer Lawrence Musgrove (Sean Combs), the proceedings prove too intense for Sonny, who collapses and then begins to vomit as he is leading Lawrence to the electric chair. Hank beats Sonny up in the jail's bathroom afterwards. Some time later, Hank drags Sonny out of bed and tells him to get out of the house. Unable to cope with the estrangement, Sonny grabs a gun. The confrontation ends in their living room with Hank at gunpoint, lying on the carpet, and Sonny in Buck's customary chair. Sonny asks his father, "You hate me, don't you?" After his father calmly confirms that he does and always has, Sonny responds, "Well, I always loved you," and then shoots himself.

Hank subsequently buries Sonny in the back garden, quits his job at the prison, burns his uniform in the backyard, and locks the door of Sonny's room up tightly. Buck calls him a quitter.

Monster's Ball - The execution scene
During the years of Lawrence's imprisonment, his wife Leticia (Halle Berry) has been struggling while raising their son Tyrell (Coronji Calhoun), who has inherited his father's artistic talent, but is also morbidly obese. 

Along with her domestic problems, Leticia struggles financially, leading to the loss of the family car and, worse, an eviction notice on her house. In desperate need of money, Leticia takes a job at a diner frequented by Hank. One rainy night, Leticia and Tyrell are walking down a soaked highway when Tyrell is struck by a car. Leticia is left helpless on the side of the road, grasping her son and calling out to passing motorists, all of whom drive past. Hank happens to be driving along and sees Leticia cradling her mortally injured son. He initially drives past, like the cars before him, but then turns around, picks Leticia and Tyrell up, and takes them to a hospital, but Tyrell dies upon arrival and Hank lends his shoulder for Leticia to cry on. 

At the suggestion of the authorities at the hospital, he drives her home. A few days later, Hank gives Leticia a ride home from the diner and after they begin talking in the car and discover their common loss of their sons, she invites him in and they drown their grief with alcohol. They begin a relationship initially based on sex and relief from loneliness but which later becomes emotionally supportive. Hank finds out that Leticia is Lawrence's widow, but he does not tell her that he participated in her husband's execution.

The film received generally positive reviews. The review website Rotten Tomatoes reported that 120 of the 141 reviews they tallied were positive. This resulted in a score of 85% and a certification of "Fresh".Roger Ebert gave the film four stars and stated that, "The movie has the complexity of great fiction", listing it as the best film of 2001. (Source: Wikipedia)

Monster's Ball (USA, 2001)
Directed by Marc Forster
Written by Milo Addica, Will Rokos
Cast: Billy Bob Thornton as Hank Grotowski, Halle Berry as Leticia Musgrove, Heath Ledger as Sonny Grotowski, Peter Boyle as Buck Grotowski, Mos Def as Ryrus Cooper, Sean Combs as Lawrence Musgrove, Coronji Calhoun as Tyrell Musgrove, Charles Cowan, Jr. as Willie Cooper
Running time: 112 minutes



The Life of David Gale

David Gale (Kevin Spacey) is a prisoner on death row in Texas. With only a few days to his execution, his lawyer negotiates a half million-dollar fee to tell his story to Bitsey Bloom (Kate Winslet), a journalist from a major news magazine known for her ability to keep secrets and protect her sources. He tells her the story of how he ended up on death row, revealed to the movie audience through a series of lengthy flashbacks.

Gale is head of the philosophy department at the (fictional) University of Austin, an author, and also an active member of Deathwatch, a group campaigning against capital punishment. He loses a televised debate with the Governor of Texas, when he is unable to point to an example of a demonstrably innocent man being executed.

Gale is married, with a small son he dotes on, but his wife, who is having an affair, spends a lot of time away, in Spain. At a graduation party, he encounters Berlin, an attractive female graduate student who had previously tried to entice him into raising her failing grade, and had later been expelled from the school. Berlin now corners the inebriated Gale and succeeds in getting him to have rough sex with her. She then falsely accuses Gale of rape. Later, she drops the charges and flees, but the negative publicity costs Gale his career and marriage and his reputation as a rapist dogs him for the rest of his life.

David Gale tells his story to reporter  Bitsey Bloom
Constance Harraway (Linney), a fellow Deathwatch activist, is a close friend, especially after Gale's wife leaves with their son. Gale's wife moves to Spain where the custody laws favor the child's mother, and her father is the American ambassador in Madrid. Gale is effectively shut out of his child's life. He has also been forced to take menial jobs, and under the stresses of it all has become an alcoholic.

Harraway is found raped and murdered. She has been suffocated by a plastic bag taped over her head and her hands have been handcuffed behind her back. An autopsy reveals that she had been forced to swallow the handcuffs' key, a psychological torture technique supposedly used by the Romanian Securitate which Gale and Harraway had both protested against. The physical evidence at the crime scene points to Gale, who is convicted of her rape and murder and is, ironically, sentenced to death.

In 2003 the film was nominated for the Golden Bear in Berlin, and for the Political Film Society Award for Human Rights. (Source: Wikipedia)

The Life of David Gale (USA, 2003)
Directed by Alan Parker
Written by Charles Randolph
Cast: Kevin Spacey, Kate Winslet, Laura Linney, Gabriel Mann, Matt Craven, Melissa McCarthy
Running time: 130 minutes

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Illinois Governor Pat Quinn signs death penalty ban, commutes 15 death row sentences to life

SPRINGFIELD — Gov. Pat Quinn today signed into law a historic ban on the death penalty in Illinois and commuted the sentences of 15 death row inmates to life without parole.

Quinn signed the legislation in his Capitol office surrounded by longtime opponents of capital punishment in a state where flaws in the process led to the exoneration of numerous people sentenced to death.

"For me, this was a difficult decision, quite literally the choice between life and death," Quinn wrote in his signing statement. "This was not a decision to be made lightly, or a decision that I came to without deep personal reflection."

"Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it," Quinn wrote. "With our broken system, we cannot ensure justice is achieved in every case."

"For the same reason, I have also decided to commute the sentences of those currently on death row to natural life imprisonment, without the possibility of parole or release," the governor wrote.

A small group of lawmakers also was on hand, including lead sponsors Rep. Karen Yarbrough, D-Maywood, and Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago. Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago, and House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, D-Chicago also attended. Lt. Gov. Sheila Simon, who lobbied Quinn to sign the ban, was there.

The ban comes about 11 years after then-Gov. George Ryan declared a moratorium on executions after 13 condemned inmates were cleared since Illinois reinstated capital punishment in 1977. Ryan, a Republican, cited a Tribune investigative series that examined each of the state's nearly 300 capital cases and exposed how bias, error and incompetence undermined many of them.

Since then, Illinois approved reforms to the capital punishment system, including taping interrogations under a proposal forged by President Barack Obama when he served in the Illinois Senate. Only two days before leaving office in January 2003, Ryan commuted the death sentences of 164 prisoners to life in prison. Quinn and his predecessor, Rod Blagojevich, kept the moratorium in place.

In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down death penalty statutes in 40 states, including Illinois. Five years later, Illinois reinstated capital punishment, and it has been among the 35 states that currently allow executions. Illinois could join New York, New Jersey and New Mexico, all of which have done away with the death penalty in the last three years.

The death penalty ban would take effect July 1.

Quinn did not have to immediately act on the 15 death row inmates, but chose to commute their sentences to life in prison.

One of them is Brian Dugan, sentenced to death for the 1983 rape and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico, of Naperville. Dugan had been serving two life sentences for two other rape-murder cases, but his death sentence brought a major chapter of a long-running, controversial case to a close. Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez — two of three men originally charged with the girl's murder — served years on death row before they were cleared.

As Quinn campaigned for governor last fall, he held firm to the moratorium as a way to see how well the reforms are working. The governor also said he supported the death penalty for the worst crimes.

Quinn made his decision after an intense lobbying effort from those on both sides of the issue.

Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan and other prosecutors urged Quinn to veto the ban and take a hard-line stance to keep the death penalty.

The governor also heard from anti-death-penalty luminaries including South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Sister Helen Prejean, a New Orleans nun whose time spent with a condemned inmate became the basis for the movie "Dead Man Walking."

Family members of murder victims also made emotional pleas. Among them was Cindy McNamara, whose daughter, Shannon, was murdered in 2001 while attending Eastern Illinois University.

Shannon McNamara was asleep in her locked off-campus apartment when she was raped, strangled, beaten and stabbed. Her body was left in the living room. A washcloth was stuffed in her mouth.

Former EIU student Anthony Mertz was convicted, becoming the first person sent to death row after Ryan emptied it.

"We have the death penalty for a reason," Cindy McNamara wrote in a letter to Quinn. "This is the reason!"

The Tribune examination found at least 46 inmates sent to death row in cases where prosecutors used jailhouse informants to convict or condemn the defendants. The investigation also found at least 33 death row inmates had been represented at trial by an attorney who had been disbarred or suspended; at least 35 African-American inmates on death row who had been convicted or condemned by an all-white jury; and about half of the nearly 300 capital cases had been reversed for a new trial or sentencing hearing.

Source: Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Illinois Becomes 4th State in Four Years to Abandon the Death Penalty

Gov. Pat Quinn signs legislation
today ending the death penalty.
Illinois Governor Pat Quinn took the final step today in ending the death penalty and replacing it with a sentence of life without parole. The law also requires that state funds used for the death penalty be transferred to a fund for murder victims’ services and law enforcement. The ban on capital punishment comes after an 11-year moratorium on executions declared by former Republican Governor George Ryan, and makes Illinois the 16th state to repeal the death penalty. It also marks the lowest number of states with the death penalty in more than 30 years.

"The Illinois repeal is an indication of a growing national trend toward alternatives to the death penalty, and an increased focus on murder victims' families and the prevention of crime," said Richard Dieter, Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center. "In light of our current economic climate, the public has increasingly recognized that resources used for the death penalty could be diverted to higher budgetary priorities, such as law enforcement and victims’ services."

Many murder victims’ families were among the strongest supporters of the Illinois repeal. In a letter to the Illinois General Assembly, murder victims' families wrote, "A legal system that wasn’t bogged down with committing tremendous resources on capital cases could prosecute and sentence countless other crimes and take dangerous people off the streets before they commit murder. Dollars saved could be put toward counseling for victims of crime or other services we desperately need as we attempt to get on with our lives." The letter was signed by more than 30 individuals who had loved ones murdered in Illinois.

The high costs of the death penalty were influential in the passage of the repeal. Conservative Republican Senator Dan Duffy of Lake Barrington said, "We have spent over $100 million of taxpayer money defending and prosecuting death row cases. The death penalty does not make our society safer, I believe. It has been an ineffective and expensive use of our scarce resources."

In the last few months, the death penalty has been under scrutiny in other states as well. Days after the Illinois General Assembly voted for the repeal, Ohio Supreme Court Justice Paul E. Pfeifer, who as a Republican state legislator played an influential role in shaping the state’s current death penalty statute, stated: “I have concluded that it is exceedingly difficult for this statute to be administered in a fair and just way… Gov. [John] Kasich and the governors after him, I believe, need to consider commuting all of those sentences to life in prison without the possibility of parole, and I think it's time for Ohio to at least entertain the discussion of whether or not we are well served by having a death penalty."

Across the country, use of the death penalty is declining as states are using alternative punishments like life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Death sentences in the United States have dropped by over 60% since the mid-90s. A recent poll conducted by Lake Research Partners showed that 61% of U.S. voters chose various alternative sentences over the death penalty as the punishment for murder. The same poll also listed the death penalty last in a list of priorities for state spending.

Since 1976, Illinois has carried out 12 executions. In the same period, 20 inmates have been exonerated from the state’s death row, the 2nd highest number in the United States. In 2003, 3 years after the moratorium was imposed, Governor Ryan issued a blanket commutation, reducing the sentences of 167 death row inmates to life and pardoning 4 inmates. Since then, Illinois has had 2 different commissions to study the death penalty and has implemented some reforms, yet continues to face an error-prone and costly system.

In the meantime, use of the death penalty has declined sharply in Illinois. In the 1990s, the state averaged over 10 death sentences a year. In 2009 and 2010, the state imposed only 1 death sentence each year.

Illinois is the 4th state in the last 4 years to abandon the death penalty. New Mexico and New Jersey voted to abolish the death penalty in 2009 and 2007, respectively. New York’s death penalty law was declared unconstitutional in 2004, and the last person was removed from death row in 2007. More states are expected to introduce legislation to repeal the death penalty in 2011, including possibly Connecticut, Kansas and Maryland.

Source: The Death Penalty Information Center is a non-profit organization serving the media and the public with analysis and information on issues concerning capital punishment. DPIC was founded in 1990 and prepares in-depth reports, issues press releases, conducts briefings for the media, and serves as a resource to those working on this issue. DPIC is widely quoted and consulted by all those concerned with the death penalty. March 9, 2011


Statement of Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights

Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights congratulates Illinois Governor Quinn on signing into law the recently passed legislation abolishing the state's death penalty. We applaud the state's decision to redirect funds formerly spent on the death penalty to services for families of homicide victims and training of law enforcement personnel. As family members of murder victims, we know that each homicide is a theft of a unique, irreplaceable, deeply loved human life, representing a world of devastation for the victim’s surviving families.

A commitment to helping these victims' families and law enforcement personnel who work to protect us is a positive step forward for Illinois.

Source: MVFHR, March 9, 2011


Community of Sant’Egidio: 'Illinois has joined the world of civilization'

It is the 16th American state in which killing is not sanctioned by law

The Community of Sant’Egidio invites Governor Pat Quinn and a delegation of the state’s House of Representatives and Senate, along with American abolition activists, to celebrate the historic event at the Coliseum in Rome

Illinois became the 16th American state to have abolished the death penalty today after Governor Pat Quinn signed the bill approved by the two houses of the State Assembly. It was an exceptional and historic day in the United States. A ten-year process leading to a stop to executions in Chicago’s state thus drew to a close, with a large bipartisan majority confirming that the death penalty is an irremediably pernicious instrument for the judicial system.

On January 6, 2011, the House of Representatives of the state of Illinois voted 60-54 in favor of the definitive abolition of capital punishment. 5 days later, on January 11, the State Senate approved the proposal with a 32-25 vote. All that was needed was the endorsement of Governor Pat Quinn, who after weighing all of the elements at his disposal put his signature on the historic document.

Illinois is the third American state to have repudiated the death penalty in the last 4 years, following New Jersey and New Mexico. This unprecedented acceleration shows how the death penalty in the United States is in difficulty and is destined to become a weapon of the past. The development of historic dimensions came just a few weeks after a stop was put to the production of sodium thiopental one of the substances used in the U.S. for lethal injection, following a campaign spearheaded by the Community of Sant’Egidio and major anti-death penalty organizations, from Reprieve to Hands off Cain, and aided by the British and Italian governments.

The Community of Sant’Egidio closely followed the campaign launched the Illinois Coalition Against the Death Penalty, coordinated by Jeremy Schroeder, as well as the initiatives of the entire American abolitionist movement It plans to celebrate the abolition of the death penalty in Illinois with a special event in Rome: the lighting of the Coliseum, international symbol of the global battle for a system of justice that respects human life at all times.

The development marks a decisive step toward abolition of the death penalty in the whole United States. In 2010 there was the lowest number of executions in the country since 1999: 46, representing a 12 % drop since the year before. 2010 was also the year in which the lowest number of death sentences were handed down in the United States since 1976: 114, 2/3 less than 15 years earlier, 1996, a record year for death sentences.

An unmistakable trend, a progressive structural decline, confirmed by the recent electoral victories of governors publicly opposed to capital punishment in California, New York State and Massachusetts. In Texas, which holds the record with 17 executions, there were less than 10 death sentences handed down. For the first time, an American judge challenged the constitutionality of the death penalty.

Precedents:

At the end of January 2000 former Governor George Ryan, a Republican, suspended all executions after it was shown that thirteen death sentences had been commuted since 1976, the year the death penalty was officially reinstated at the federal level, because the prisoners were proven innocent. That was 1 more prisoner than the 12 death row convicts proven guilty. These numbers represented an evident anomaly for capital punishment in the large American state, a manifest gap also present in all of the other states which maintain the death penalty.

The commission created by Ryan to shed full light on the dynamics of capital sentences in Illinois came to the conclusion, after 2 years of study, that no penal system can ever be so perfect as to rule out sensational judicial error. The death penalty, with its definitive and irreparable characteristic, thus inherently represents a premise for an extremely unjust punishment. Not only that. The commission also discovered how external factors, such as ethnic identity, social class, geography, the emotional susceptibility of public opinion, the ineptitude of defense lawyers, affect the use of the death penalty in the sentencing process.

In January 2003, near the end of his mandate, Governor Ryan commuted 167 death sentences to life imprisonment after discovering the large number of errors made in the respective trials. It was the 1st widespread amnesty ever declared in American death rows. Ryan’s successors kept the moratorium in effect. It was shown that it cost the state over 100 million dollars to support the few dozen remaining inmates on death row. Even for this reason alone, a growing number of American states are wondering if it is worthwhile to pursue the path of legal assassination.

Illinois “is no longer in the company of countries which commit the worst violation of human rights: it has joined the world of civilization, putting an end to the suppression of innocent lives”, commented Senator Kwame Raoul, one of the key sponsors of the anti-death penalty bill.

Source: Sant'Egidio, March 9, 2011


Capital punishment in the United States

The governor of Illinois on Wednesday signed a bill banning the death penalty in the state. The following are some facts and figures about the death penalty in the United States since 1977, when executions resumed following the lifting of a ban on the practice by the U.S. Supreme Court the previous year.

* There have been 1,242 executions in the United States since 1977. The peak year was 1999, when 98 were carried out, while no inmates were put to death in 1978 and 1980. The number of executions dropped 12 % last year to 46. 8 people have been executed so far this year.

* The year 2009, the last for which data is available, saw 112 death sentences imposed, the lowest number over the past three decades. The peak year was 1996 when 315 were handed down.

* The death penalty is sanctioned by 34 of the 50 states and the U.S. government and military -- not counting Illinois, where the ban will take effect July 1. Lethal injection is the main method used by all of the death penalty states.

* The Death Penalty Information Center said there have been 138 exonerations of death row inmates since 1973.

* Texas has been by far the most active death penalty state in the post-1976 era, with 466 executions. Virginia is a distant 2nd at 108.

* In 2008, the United States ranked fourth in the world in the number of executions carried out with 37. China carried out by far the most with 1,718, followed by Iran with 346, Saudi Arabia with 102, the United States, Pakistan with 36, and Iraq with 34.

Source: Reuters, March 9, 2011


Scott Turow: The conservative argument to abolish the death penalty

This week's abolition of the death penalty in Illinois is commonly viewed as a triumph for progressives. But some of the most persuasive arguments for doing away with capital punishment basically reflect conservative views. The last decade has seen many noted conservatives like George Will, Richard Viguerie and L. Brent Bozell III emerge as death-penalty opponents. One reason that abolition became a political possibility here was not simply because it attracted Republican votes in the House and the Senate, but because many conservatives have grown more ambivalent about the issue and less fierce in their opposition.

Here are some of the leading conservative arguments for ending executions.

The death penalty is one more government program that's failed.

This oft-quoted observation is an elaboration on comments and more than a clever turn of phrase by former Illinoisan, George Will, perhaps the nation's leading conservative columnist.

Illinois reinstituted capital punishment in 1977, after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down all prior statutory schemes as unconstitutionally arbitrary and capricious. We have now conducted a 33-year experiment in seeing whether death sentences can be meted out in a rational, proportionate fashion that has clearly failed.

I was a member of the 14-person Commission on Capital Punishment appointed by then-Gov. George Ryan in 2000 to study the death penalty. I started out ambivalent, because I knew there will always be certain murders and killers who will cry out for this ultimate form of retribution. But after two years I came to realize that we will never construct a capital system that functions with anything resembling fairness.

Despite decades of legislation and litigation aimed at establishing procedural bulwarks, the imposition of the death penalty in Illinois remained haphazard. Studies authorized by the commission found that, in Illinois, defendants were five times more likely to be sentenced to death if they committed their crimes in rural areas, as opposed to cities; twice as likely to be sentenced to death if they killed a woman; and 21/2 times more likely to be capitally sentenced for the murder of a white person, as compared to an African-American.

Worst of all is the institutional propensity to sentence innocent people to death. Since 1977, 20 people have been sentenced to death in our state only to be legally absolved of the murders that put them on death row. This reflects what I refer to as the paradox of capital punishment. We have lived with the illusion that we can reserve capital punishment for the so-called "worst of the worst," the most heinous, brutal or repetitive murders. What we have failed to realize is that those very crimes stir our deepest anxieties and outrage, and thus are hardest to deal with in the kind of rational, highly deliberative way that taking a life should require. As a result, police, prosecutors, judges and juries too often have engaged in a rush to judgment that ignores the presumption of innocence and has led now and then to the law's ultimate nightmare, condemning the innocent.

For conservatives who believe government is too large, too inefficient and too unwieldy to deliver health care, or even the mail for that matter, it should come as no surprise that government efforts to justly select those worthy of death has been a moral disaster.

The death penalty is a waste of money.

Study after study has shown that the death penalty costs far more than sentencing defendants irrevocably to life in prison without parole. That may seem counterintuitive because executions, of course, shorten prisoners lives. But the costs before that point overwhelm those savings. Most of the money is spent dealing with people like me — lawyers. Everyone recognizes that in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's famous phrase, "death is different." We want to be sure that the condemned have enjoyed every legal right before they die, and as a result we have pyramided costs: 2 defense lawyers at trial —almost always government paid because capital defendants are overwhelmingly poor — and prosecutors to match them. Then there are the endless parade of appeals and post-conviction proceedings, which typically cost the state money for more than a decade.

Of course, if the death penalty clearly served a practical purpose like saving lives, these increased costs might be worth it. But in Illinois we have experienced a steady decline in our murder rate since Gov. Ryan first declared the moratorium on executions in January 2000 that has remained in place since. Murders in the vast majority of cases are impulsive acts by people who give no thought to getting caught. Thus the idea of deterrence is largely phantom. In a state that is now $15 billion in debt we cannot afford to throw good dollars after bad on a system that exists only to do a botched job of vindicating citizens' sense of moral outrage.

The death penalty is incomaptible with the notion of limited government.

In western Europe, all of our allies have outlawed the death penalty, most them taking that step after World War II. The reason was not so much popular opposition as historical experience. In Germany, Hitler had come to power as the result of his election, and proceeded to enact a series of tyrannical laws. The fact that the horrors of the World War II sprang directly from a democracy run amok persuaded European intellectuals and politicians that the state should never have the lawful power to kill.

In the United States, we are cheerfully oblivious to those risks and with good reason. From 1998 to 2001, for example, we saw one president impeached, another empowered without a popular majority, and our nation attacked by a pernicious foreign force; never once in any of those crises did we see troops in the street. The extraordinary durability of the American democracy is one of our greatest achievements, but it is naive to believe in Sinclair Lewis' phrase that it can't happen here. The conservative-libertarian view that says that the powers of government must be strictly limited supports drawing a clear line prohibiting a democratic government from ever lawfully killing any of the citizens from whom it draws power. That way a regime that vanished its political enemies or executed despised minorities would mark itself, whatever the legal rigamorole, as an outlaw.

At the end of the day, Illinois' abolition of capital punishment is part of an evolving national recognition that the death penalty is truly un-American.

Source: Scott F. Turow, a Chicago attorney and best-selling author, was a member of the Commission on Capital Punishment; Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Statement from Governor Pat Quinn on Senate Bill 3539

Today I have signed Senate Bill 3539, which abolishes the death penalty in Illinois.
For me, this was a difficult decision, quite literally the choice between life and death. This was not a decision to be made lightly, or a decision that I came to without deep personal reflection.
Since the General Assembly passed this bill, I have met or heard from a wide variety of people on both sides of the issue. I have talked with prosecutors, judges, elected officials, religious leaders from around the world, families of murder victims, people on death row who were exonerated and ordinary citizens who have taken the time to share their thoughts with me. Their experiences, words and opinions have made a tremendous impact on my thinking, and I thank everyone who reached out on this matter.
After their guidance, as well as much thought and reflection, I have concluded that our system of imposing the death penalty is inherently flawed. The evidence presented to me by former prosecutors and judges with decades of experience in the criminal justice system has convinced me that it is impossible to devise a system that is consistent, that is free of discrimination on the basis of race, geography or economic circumstance, and that always gets it right.
As a state, we cannot tolerate the executions of innocent people because such actions strike at the very legitimacy of a government. Since 1977, Illinois has seen 20 people exonerated from death row. Seven of those were exonerated since the moratorium was imposed in 2000. That is a record that should trouble us all. To say that this is unacceptable does not even begin to express the profound regret and shame we, as a society, must bear for these failures of justice.
Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it. With our broken system, we cannot ensure justice is achieved in every case. For the same reason, I have also decided to commute the sentences of those currently on death row to natural life imprisonment, without the possibility of parole or release.
I have found no credible evidence that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on the crime of murder and that the enormous sums expended by the state in maintaining a death penalty system would be better spent on preventing crime and assisting victims’ families in overcoming their pain and grief.
To those who say that we must maintain a death penalty for the sake of the victims’ families, I say that it is impossible not to feel the pain of loss that all these families share or to understand the desire for retribution that many may hold. But, as I heard from family members who lost loved ones to murder, maintaining a flawed death penalty system will not bring back their loved ones, will not help them to heal and will not bring closure to their pain. Nothing can do that. We must instead devote our resources toward the prevention of crime and the needs of victims’ families, rather than spending more money to preserve a flawed system.
The late Cardinal Joseph Bernadin observed, “[i]n a complex, sophisticated democracy like ours, means other than the death penalty are available and can be used to protect society.” In our current criminal justice system, we can impose extremely harsh punishments when warranted. Judges can impose sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Where necessary and appropriate, the state can incarcerate convicted criminals in maximum security prisons. These means should be sufficient to satisfy our need for retribution, justice and protection.
As Governor, I took an oath to uphold our state’s Constitution and faithfully execute our laws. Honoring that oath often requires making difficult decisions, but I have found none to be as difficult as the one I made today. I recognize that some may strongly disagree with this decision, but I firmly believe that we are taking an important step forward in our history as Illinois joins the 15 other states and many nations of the world that have abolished the death penalty.


Source: Illinois Government News Network, March 9, 2011


Ryan hails death penalty abolition, calling it ‘a long time coming'

Former Gov. George Ryan, who fought aggressively to abolish the death penalty after he left office — and who issued the moratorium against state executions when he was governor — dispatched this exclusive message to the Sneed column after Gov. Quinn signed historic legislation ending executions in Illinois.

“It’s been a long time coming,” said Ryan, who is now serving a sentence for public corruption at a federal prison in Indiana.

“I’m so glad the legislation has finally passed and Gov. Quinn signed the bill. It’s the result of all the good work of those who fought long and hard in advance of anything I did to help bring this about. I just hope more states join in as well as the federal government.

“We now know with a moral certainty an innocent person will not be put to death in Illinois. I want to thank Gov. Quinn for making the right call."

Ryan’s son, Homer, who talked to his father Wednesday evening, told Sneed: “I was with my dad the night he made his decision to place a moratorium on executions in Illinois. This was not an easy decision, but it came down simply to killing an innocent person. There are flaws in every system but this is what really bothered him."

“I’m sure George was absolutely elated,” said Rob Warden, executive director of Northwestern University’s Center on Wrongful Convictions. “It was very gracious of Gov. Quinn to give George credit during his press conference,” added Warden.

A somber note: “But you know . . . even though I’m absolutely elated and never thought I’d see this happen in my lifetime, there is something very surreal about it,” said Warden. “It all happened so quickly and without much [fanfare]."

Source: Chicago Sun-Times, March 9, 20011


Gov. Pat Quinn turned to Bible and writings of late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin for difficult death penalty decision


Gov. Pat Quinn turned to the Bible for wisdom. He drew strength from the writings of the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin. And he pored over the impassioned pleas from families of murder victims who begged him to give them a chance at closure.

Finally, after 2 months of struggling with what he said is the hardest decision he's had to make as governor, Quinn decided over the weekend to abolish the death penalty in Illinois and clear out death row.

"It is impossible to create a perfect system, free of all mistakes," Quinn said Wednesday, moments after signing the death penalty ban into law. "I think it's the right and just thing to abolish the death penalty and punish those who commit heinous crimes — evil people — with life in prison without parole or any chance of release."

The governor conceded he talked to few of the families of victims of the 15 murderers on death row, and he grasped for ways to console them.

"There are no words in the English language, or any language, to ease your pain," Quinn said soberly. "I want to tell them, it's impossible, I'm sure, to ever be healed. But we want to tell all of the family members, the family of Illinois … we want to be with you. You're not alone in your grief."

It was a legacy moment for Quinn, whose historic action might end up as the foremost achievement of a governor previously noteworthy for his succession of the impeached Rod Blagojevich.

Newly elected to his own term, Quinn's decision also caps a strong liberal shift for a state that had long been known for centrist, pragmatic politics. In the last few months, Democrats led by Quinn have imposed a major income-tax increase, legalized civil unions for same-sex couples and taken the death penalty off the books.

The political impact of those measures will play out in the coming years. Quinn already is being criticized by lawmakers and prosecutors who point out that violent criminals can now kill police officers and murder multiple victims without fear of losing their own lives.

Rep. Dennis Reboletti said the "big winners" were murderers on death row.

"The people of the state of Illinois aren't the winners," said Reboletti, R-Elmhurst.

A man of Catholic faith, Quinn cited Bernardin's own words: "In a complex, sophisticated democracy like ours, means other than the death penalty are available and can be used to protect society."

Life sentences to maximum security prisons, Quinn said, "should be sufficient to satisfy our need for retribution, justice and protection."

The governor called it impossible to create a justice system "free of all discrimination with respect to race or economic circumstances or geography" in a state where 102 separate state's attorneys impose different standards. And he weighed what's the appropriate justice for the worst killers against how Illinois exonerated 20 people once "in grave danger" of facing an irreversible punishment.

Pressed for a deeper explanation, Quinn acknowledged that child killer John Wayne Gacy, the poster boy for why Illinois has used the death penalty, committed the heinous crimes of an "evil man."

But Quinn said a system that risks killing an innocent man "cannot stand."

One of those whose sentence was commuted is Brian Dugan, sentenced to death for the 1983 rape and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico, of Naperville. Dugan had been serving 2 life sentences for 2 other rape-murder cases, but his death sentence for Nicarico's murder had seemingly brought a measure of closure to a saga seared into the collective minds of Chicago-area residents.

Yet that chapter did not end without exposing overwhelming human mistakes. Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez — two of three men originally charged with the girl's murder — served years on death row before they were cleared.

Quinn signed the bill in his office with only a handful of leading supporters, including the chief sponsors from each chamber, Rep. Karen Yarbrough, D-Maywood, and Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago. The two clutched pens Quinn used to sign the legislation as they hugged behind the governor's wooden desk.

Tears welled in Raoul's eyes several minutes after Quinn defended his decision.

"God bless the state of Illinois. The light of God is shining," Raoul said. "Shining positively upon our state. This is a historic day. We enter into this business trying to have some impact on lives. There's no greater impact that you can have than to do something that will save a life."

Yarbrough said she once supported the death penalty but that the exonerations serve as a "painful and stirring reminder that death is an absolute penalty. Once imposed, there is no second chance, no reversal and no way to correct a mistake."

Exonerated former inmate Gordon "Randy" Steidl, who spent 17 years in prison, including 12 on death row, was among the death penalty opponents who praised Quinn.

"He made a decision today, a moral, righteous decision, when he realized that there are flaws in this system that almost took my life and 19 other men in Illinois," Steidl said.

Not everyone at the Capitol cheered, given the legislation cleared the General Assembly with only a few votes to spare in the waning days of a lame-duck session in January. Death penalty proponents already are seeking to reinstate capital punishment.

Rep. Jim Durkin, R-Western Springs, predicted Quinn's actions would haunt him if he plans to run for re-election in 2014.

Quinn chose to focus on the arguments lawmakers gave when they approved the ban. He also deflected questions on how he campaigned last fall as a death penalty supporter. Quinn had kept in place the moratorium first imposed by Republican adversary and predecessor Gov. George Ryan, who cleared death row in 2003 by commuting to life in prison the death sentences for more than 160 inmates.

But Quinn hesitated when asked to draw comparisons between his actions and those of Ryan, who is serving time in federal prison for corruption. The governor said the 2 each followed their consciences.

"I think God wants you to do it that way," Quinn said.

Source: Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Quinn ends death row at Pontiac prison

Pontiac Correctional Center
Gov. Pat Quinn signaled the end of Pontiac Correctional Center's role as home to Illinois' death row Wednesday.

Although state prison officials are not sure what will happen to the 22 cells reserved for condemned prisoners, the governor's decision to abolish the death penalty and commute the sentences of the 15 men on who reside there will symbolically and physically alter the makeup of the 140-year-old lockup.

Quinn's landmark move also will end Dwight Correctional Center's role as the designated death row for women and eliminate Tamms Correctional Center as the home of the state's execution chamber, last used in 1999 when Andrew Kokoraleis was executed by lethal injection.

The formal abolition will go into effect on July 1, meaning death row will technically remain in place until then.

The 15 residents of the gallery whose sentences were commuted to life in prison without the possibility of release eventually will be moved into other units.

"I know they will stay in a maximum-security facility," said Illinois Department of Corrections spokeswoman Sharyn Elman.

John Maki, executive director of the John Howard Association, a prison watchdog group, was on a team surveying Pontiac on Jan. 11 -- the day the Illinois Senate approved the death penalty abolition.

He said condemned prisoners were curious about what the abolition would mean for their sentences, which are served in isolation from the general prison population.

Elman could provide no timetable for when the prisoners would be moved out of their current cells, but Maki said the inmates should be prepared for significant changes, including possibly having to share a cell with another inmate.

"Their life in prison arguably gets worse," Maki said.

At least one state lawmaker said Pontiac officials should be given clear directions on what to do with the inmates.

"Those correctional facilities need to know what to do with those death row inmates and transition them to wherever they will be housed to comply with the law as it stands now," said state Rep. Jason Barickman, R-Champaign, who represents Pontiac.

Elman said it is too early to know how the emptied space will be used. For the most part, the section set aside for condemned inmates looks similar to the rest of the 1,650-inmate facility.

"It's basically indistinguishable from other parts of the prison," said Maki.

There is no official space dedicated to a female version of death row at Dwight because there were no women sentenced to death at the time of Quinn's action.

If there were, however, Elman said they too would be separated by sight and sound from other inmates.

Source: Bloomington Pantagraph, March 9, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

University forum speaker: ‘Dead Man Walking’ author learned from victims’ families

Sr. Helen Prejean
Sister Helen Prejean, by her own admission, met Lloyd LeBlanc at the worst possible time. But what he taught her made LeBlanc the hero, she says, of the story that made Prejean possibly the best-known opponent of the death penalty in America.

In 1982, the New Orleans nun became a pen pal with, and then spiritual advisor to, Patrick Sonnier, an inmate on Louisiana’s death row for the 1977 murders of teenagers Loretta Bourque and David LeBlanc. Familiarizing herself with the graphic details of the case, Prejean both questioned her relationship with Sonnier and received a “nudge” to contact the victims’ families—a prod she didn’t heed, she recalled March 1 at Bluffton University.

As a result, she had no contact with the families until a Louisiana Pardon Board hearing, the last legal hurdle to the execution that she was there to oppose. Meeting outside while the board was voting, the outraged Bourque family avoided her. She was prepared for the same response from the LeBlancs, but what came next surprised, and instructed, her.

Telling Prejean that the family name died with his only son, Lloyd LeBlanc reminded her that “you never once came to us” and added that she couldn’t imagine the pressure on the families due to the death penalty. Shocked, she thought to herself, “What does he mean, ‘pressure,’?” she remembered.

LeBlanc told Prejean she needed to pray with him and, as they knelt in a chapel, he prayed for everyone involved, including Sonnier’s mother, on whom a town’s hatred was also being poured, Prejean related.

As she and LeBlanc became friends, he took her through his journey of trying to follow the Gospel after being “thrown into the fire” by his son’s murder. He felt he had to be in favor of the death penalty or it would appear he didn’t love his son, he explained. “That’s what he meant by the ‘pressure,’” Prejean said.

LeBlanc acquiesced to the pro-death penalty voices at first, he admitted to her. But the hatred connected with wanting to see someone suffer and die “gets inside you,” he added, and “I didn’t like the way it made me feel.” He decided he wouldn’t let the state kill him, and the person he was, too, Prejean said, quoting LeBlanc as saying “I’m gonna do what Jesus said to do” and forgive.

Although forgiveness is often equated with weakness, it actually “preserves love and integrity,” she told her Bluffton audience, calling LeBlanc the first of many victims’ family members who have taught her lessons on her journey with the death penalty.

Prejean’s experience with the Sonnier case became her best-selling, Pulitzer Prize-nominated book, “Dead Man Walking: An Eyewitness Account of the Death Penalty in the United States.” The 1995 film adaptation of the book starred Academy Award-winner Susan Sarandon as Prejean, who spoke at Bluffton as part of the Smucker Distinguished Lectureship Series.

She advocated for restorative justice—which she credited the Mennonite community for helping implement in many places—and for greater support for murder victims’ families, rather than redemptive violence. She had been stunned to learn, she said, how victims’ families are left alone because others don’t know how to deal with their pain. Thus, she continued, they become pariahs along with the murderers. “Do we have to have another death?” she asked. “We have life without parole in every state."

Prejean, who began her prison ministry in 1981, acknowledged that it took her a while to come to an understanding about Jesus siding with outcasts in the Gospel. “For a long time, I didn’t get it,” said the Baton Rouge, La., native, who admittedly grew up in privilege and with black servants in a segregated society.

Moving into the St. Thomas Housing Project in New Orleans, where she saw black people struggling for their lives, changed her heart, Prejean said. “Seeing people suffering—that’s what changed me,” she added.

“Racism is integral in the application of the death penalty,” she argued, citing statistics that 80 % of U.S. death-row prison cells hold people who have killed whites, while half of all American murder victims are people of color. She said, too, that less than 1 percent of convicted murders are ultimately executed, and they tend to fit a profile of being poor and killing white people. The system is “so filled with fluke,” she continued, noting that the state where the crime is committed is also a prime factor in determining whether capital punishment will be applied.

“Consciousness triggers conscience,” said Prejean, who has accompanied six men to the execution chambers of Louisiana and Texas and also wrote “The Death of Innocents: An Eyewitness Account of Wrongful Executions,” in 2004. “We have a lot of reasons not to think of people in prisons,” she said, but when people become aware, “consciousness brings with it a responsibility."

“We need to end this government killing of people."

The Smucker series, which brings significant contributors to the field of social work to the Bluffton campus, is named for Carl Smucker, who taught social work at Bluffton for 34 years beginning in 1944.

Source: Bluffton Icon, March 2, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Quinn says Bishop Tutu, 'Dead Man Walking' nun lobbying him to sign death penalty ban

Gov. Pat Quinn said Thursday that South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu was among scores of people to weigh in with him as he considers what to do about a bill that would ban capital punishment in Illinois.

The governor faces a deadline of March 18 to act on the death penalty ban, which was passed by the legislature last month. He could do nothing and allow it to become law. He could veto the measure outright. And he could use his amendatory veto power to rewrite the legislation, which would effectively kill it since the bill was passed by the previous General Assembly.

“I’m looking at all aspects of that issue,” said Quinn, who has supported the death penalty but who has maintained a moratorium on state executions that was put in place by then-Gov. George Ryan in 2000 after a number of wrongly convicted people were sentenced to death. “I think it’s important for the governor to visit and listen to a variety of different groups and individuals on this very important issue."

Quinn said making a decision will require “a little bit more time, not much more” and that acting on the measure will occur “relatively soon."

Previously, Quinn has said he would make a decision based upon his “conscience” and not on based on his upbringing in the Catholic church, which opposes capital punishment.

“I’ve gotten a lot of communication from people all over Illinois, all over America and indeed the world,” Quinn said, citing a conversation with Tutu, the South African civil rights leader who fought apartheid and opposes the death penalty, and Sister Helen Prejean, the New Orleans nun whose story was the basis for the film “Dead Man Walking."

But Quinn said he also has talked to a law enforcement community that believes the threat of capital punishment is an effective tool. Last week, he said, he met with members of an anti-violence coalition whose members had family killed by violence. He was scheduled to meeting murder victims’ families later Thursday.

Quinn also had asked for input from Attorney General Lisa Madigan, who said last week that she considered “the death penalty is an appropriate and just punishment when a defendant commits multiple murders or murders a victim in a particularly heinous manner or circumstances."

One person he said he hasn’t heard from is Ryan, the former governor imprisoned in Indiana on federal corruption charges, who made Illinois the first state in the nation to have a moratorium on carrying out the death penalty.

“I’ve received a lot of books and articles and letters and e-mails. Many citizens of Illinois who aren’t celebrities of any kind, but have a strong feeling on the issue, pro and con, have sent in their point of view and this is healthy,” Quinn said. “I want to make sure we do this right and do it in a way that encourages dialogue. I think that’s the best way to go in a democracy."

Source: Chicago Tribune, February 24, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

'Dead Man Walking' nun donates papers to DePaul

Sr. Helen Prejean
DePaul University today unveiled the personal archives of Sister Helen Prejean, the outspoken New Orleans nun and author who became one of the nation’s leading voices against the death penalty and whose story was the basis of the film “Dead Man Walking."

Her archives include personal journals, notes from meetings, letters, speeches and other artifacts spanning three decades.

The papers include her personal correspondence and manuscripts for her books, including “Dead Man Walking,” an account of Prejean’s spiritual relationship with a Louisiana Death Row inmate that later became an Oscar-winning movie.

"Sister Prejean has long been a leading light in the fight for social justice across a wide spectrum of issues, especially the movement to end capital punishment in the United States,” said the Rev. Dennis H. Holtschneider, DePaul’s president.

"We are deeply honored that she has chosen DePaul to preserve the records of her life’s work. We are committed to making certain that her papers will long serve as an important and accessible research tool for scholars and others interested in fighting for the rights of the condemned."

Illinois legislators voted to abolish the death penalty last month. Gov. Pat Quinn still must sign the legislation for it to become law. John Holden, a spokesman for DePaul, said Prejean’s gift had nothing to do with the pending legislation, but was purely coincidental.

Source: Chicago Tribune, February 9, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Missouri: The future of the death penalty

Missouri has executed 67 people since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. Only Texas, Virginia, Oklahoma, and Florida have carried out more death sentences since that time.

Missouri did not put anyone to death until 1989, but executions reached an all time high in the state from 1990 to 1999. During that time, 40 prisoners were executed by lethal injection. Texas and Virginia were the only states to execute more prisoners in those 10 years.

Death sentences reached their highest peak in Missouri in 1988, when 17 prisoners were condemned to die after being found guilty of 1st degree murder. In 1999, the state carried out nine executions, the most in Missouri since the death penalty was reinstated.

"That is a reflection of where the death penalty was in the 90s," said Corinne Farrell, Communications and Education Director at the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington, D.C. "Tons of people were being sentenced to death, and it was very popular."

A stall in the process

While Missouri has been a leader in executions over the past 2 decades, 15 other states have conducted more executions between 2009-2010.

Since 2005, the state has carried out one death sentence. The decline stems from a 2006 case regarding the constitutionality of lethal injection, and a national moratorium, which put all executions on hold in 2008.

In January 2006, a decision by the US District Court, based on the constitutionality of Missouri's execution procedure, placed a moratorium on all executions in the state.

The case was filed by Michael Taylor who was to be put to death in 2006, but was given a stay of execution just minutes before the sentence was carried out.

The decision by the court came after the surgeon, who prepared the three drugs for the lethal injection process, admitted to only using half of the set dosage of Thiopental, the first drug injected in the three-drug protocol, which puts the inmate to sleep.

Doctors at the trial testified that without the proper dosage of Thiopental, the third drug, Potassium Chloride, would result in a painful death.

Because the Department of Corrections did not have a written protocol for executions, Dr. "Doe 1" as he was referred to in the 2006 court document, felt he could use his own judgment for the execution procedure. Dr. "Doe 1" also admitted to being dyslexic.

During the Taylor litigation, the district court determined Missouri's unwritten method of execution subjected condemned prisoners to an unconstitutional risk of pain and suffering and ordered the state to prepare a written protocol, according to the 2006 document.

After the Missouri Department of Corrections installed a written protocol for its execution process in July 2006, the 8th Circuit Courts of the Appeals vacated their previous decision in June 2007.

Shortly after, the US Supreme Court ordered a national moratorium, which put all executions on hold, to examine the three drug protocol in Kentucky.

On April 16, 2008, the supreme court ruled that Kentucky's three-drug protocol for carrying out lethal injection did not amount to cruel and unusual punishment. As a result, the national moratorium was lifted.

Only five states issued more death sentences than Missouri, which imposed 6 that year. Across the country there were only 111, bringing death sentences to an all time low.

Missouri only issued one death sentence in 2007, during which the Taylor case was still going on.

The Supreme Court decision did not bring the debate over lethal injection in Missouri to a close. Taylor and 7 other inmates appealed to the courts again.

According to the 2009 8th circuit court document, the inmates contended that Missouri's current execution protocol violated the 8th Amendment because the substantial risk of the protocol, and that it may be improperly administered by incompetent, or unqualified medical personnel.

While a final decision was still being made in the case, Missouri executed its first inmate since 2005. Dennis Skillicorn became the 67th inmate to be put to death on May 20, 2009. Because Skillicorn was not a part of the current lawsuit, the process was allowed to take place.

Reginald Clemens was scheduled to be executed in June 2009, but was given a stay because he was part of the case.

On Nov. 10, 2009 the federal appeals court ruled against the inmates. Taylor said they would appeal that decision as well.

While 61 inmates remain on Missouri death row, the state has not scheduled any executions for 2011, but Farrell believes its just a matter of time before executions resume in Missouri.

Roderick Nunley was scheduled to die by lethal injection late last month but a Federal District Court issued a stay on Oct. 20 to decide if Nunley was entitled to a jury for sentencing. Missouri is appealing that stay.

The Missouri Supreme Court says it will look into the case again in January.

Jacquline Lapine, the Chief Public Information Officer at the Missouri Department of corrections, said the department would resume executions as soon as directed by the courts.

Where the trend is heading

The lethal injection debate has given anti death penalty supporters more reason for opposition, and public opinion polls show that there are less people in favor of the death penalty than there was in the mid-90s.

A 2006 Gallup Poll found that the overall support for the death penalty was 65%, down from 80% in 1994.

"We are seeing a diminishment in practice across the country on the death penalty," Sister Helen Prejean said. "I have not found in the last 20 years, that the American public is wedded to it."

Prejean has accompanied 16 prisoners to their execution over the past two decades. For 20 years, her goal has been to get people to reflect on the death penalty, and ultimately, see it eliminated.

Source: Daily Mirror, November 30, 2010