Showing posts with label Costs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Costs. Show all posts

Friday, April 29, 2011

Governor Brown Cancels Plan to Build New $356 Million Condemned Inmate Housing Facility at San Quentin

San Quentin's new death chamber
SACRAMENTO – Acting to save taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. today canceled plans to build new housing for condemned inmates at San Quentin.

“At a time when children, the disabled and seniors face painful cuts to essential programs, the State of California cannot justify a massive expenditure of public dollars for the worst criminals in our state,” said Brown. “California will have to find another way to address the housing needs of condemned inmates. It would be unconscionable to earmark $356 million for a new and improved death row while making severe cuts to education and programs that serve the most vulnerable among us.”

Planning for a new condemned inmate housing facility at San Quentin was initiated in 2003, during the administration of Governor Gray Davis, and was continued by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s administration. The project was designed to house 1,152 inmates and provide for future growth of California’s condemned population. California currently has fewer than 700 inmates awaiting death sentences.

This project would have added another $356 million to the state’s debt, at an annual cost of $28.5 million in debt service that would have come out of General Fund dollars.

Source: Los Angeles Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, April 29, 2011


California: Brown Cancels New Death Row Complex

Gov. Jerry Brown has canceled plans for a new $356 million death row complex at San Quentin State Prison. Governor Brown said Thursday that the state could not justify the expense at a time of huge cuts to education and other essential services. Plans for the new death row complex were approved in 2003 by Gov. Gray Davis and continued to be developed under Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The complex was designed to house 1,152 inmates, allowing California’s condemned population to grow. The state now has fewer than 700 inmates awaiting death sentences.

Source: AP, April 29, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Repeal Capital Punishment in North Carolina, Says Study

BOONE, N.C. - "End the death penalty in North Carolina," suggests a recent study, which asserts that capital punishment is not a deterrent to criminals and costs the public more does than a sentence of life in prison. Another factor is the recent revelation that evidence has been mishandled by the state crime lab, possibly sending innocent people to death row, as study author Dr. Matthew Robinson, professor of government and justice studies at Appalachian State University, explains.

"It's not fixable. It's not something that we can make effective. It's not something that we can bring about justice with. It's not something we can guarantee won't be used against the innocent."

Executions in North Carolina haven't taken place since 2006, in part because of a dispute over the constitutionality of the lethal-injection process. Meanwhile, the murder rate declined by 19 percent from 2008 to 2009.

In March, Illinois became the fourth state in the last two years to repeal the death penalty. That state had halted executions in 2000 because of revelations of false convictions and evidence mishandling.

Robinson says changing the law will give the state more resources for victim services and law enforcement.

"The savings that they're going to retain in money from not having the death penalty, they're going to actually use to solve crimes and pursue violent crime."

Supporters of the death penalty say the punishment should still be available for the most violent crimes. Capital punishment is used in 34 states and in certain federal cases, but most western democracies no longer carry out executions.

The study is available at www.pscj.appstate.edu

Source: Public News Service, April 18, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Pennsylvania House Votes to Expand Death Penalty as International Controversy Mounts

Pennsylvania's moves in the opposite direction of the prevailing winds of reform.

On April 6, Sister Helen Prejean, author of the book "Dead Man Walking" and the inspiration for the 1995 film of the same name starring Susan Sarandon as a Catholic nun counseling a condemned prisoner, stood before a packed crowd at Chestnut Hill College in Philadelphia to tell her story and urge attendees -- especially young people -- to join efforts to end capital punishment in Pennsylvania.

"As long as we are not active, as long as we don't raise our voice, as long as we don't resist, we too are responsible," said the fiery, 71 year-old abolitionist.

Her talk couldn't have come at a more dubious time for the death penalty in America.

Since Governor Pat Quinn formally abolished capital punishment in Illinois in March, legislators in no less than half-a-dozen states have introduced bills to repeal the death penalty and replace it with life without parole. States where abolitionist legislation is being considered include three of the death penalty's "big four" -- Texas, Florida and Pennsylvania, which together account for nearly a third of the nation's condemned inmates. (California, which leads the nation with 711 prisoners awaiting execution, has no such legislation pending).

Separately, an international scandal involving a key ingredient used to execute inmates has focused world attention on a U.S. practice that remains out of step with much of the developed world.

Earlier this year Illinois-based Hospira, the only American-based manufacturer of the barbiturate sodium thiopental, chose to stop making it rather than promise authorities in Italy - the site of its new manufacturing facility - that its drug wouldn't be used for capital punishment. Until recently sodium thiopental, sold under the brand name Pentothal, was a primary ingredient in the lethal injection cocktails of 34 states.

Hospira was already facing a shortage of key components used in the manufacture of the drug. The decision to cease production sparked a nationwide shortage of sodium thiopental and forced some states to seek the drug from less reputable overseas suppliers, sparking controversy and in some cases legal intervention.

On March 15 the Drug Enforcement Agency seized Georgia's entire stock of sodium thiopental less than a month after attorneys for inmate Andrew Grant DeYoung notified Attorney General Eric Holder that the Georgia Department of Corrections had imported a quantity of the drug without proper registration from the United Kingdom last July. Since December 2011 Britain has enforced export controls on sodium thiopental.

According to records obtained by attorney John Bentivoglio, the drug came from a small, mom-and-pop wholesaler called Dream Pharma, which ran its operations out of a rented space in the back of a driving school in Acton.

Georgia had already executed two men using the drug, both of whom kept their eyes open during the process. An analysis by the UK-based death penalty abolitionist group Reprieve suggests the quality of the sodium thiopental may have been compromised by poor storage, and both inmates were likely partially conscious throughout the execution process -- a grueling experience according to anesthesiologists .

"At last someone is paying attention to the shenanigans that have been going on with the fly-by-night company exporting large quantities of execution drugs from Britain," said Reprieve's Director Clive Stafford Smith, commenting on the DEA's action.

Kentucky and Tennessee responded to the seizure by turning over their entire stocks of sodium thiopental to federal authorities, but at least 5 other states are reported to have acquired the drug overseas. Last week The Times of India revealed that at least 2 states, Nebraska and South Dakota, were using a Mumbai-based company as their supplier; on April 6, the company, Kayem Pharmaceutical, said it would no longer ship the drug to the U.S.

Pennsylvania - where more than 200 condemned inmates sit on death row -- has so far refrained from entering the debate, and no published reports exist outlining its plans as sodium thiopental becomes less available.

Susan McNaughton, communications director at the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, declined to comment on the supplier of the state's sodium thiopental, or if it maintained a stock of the drug, but said the DOC is "reviewing its options" as to how the issue surrounding the availability of the drug will affect the execution process in Pennsylvania, if at all.

"We have no reason to think that we are not prepared to carry out executions," she said.

A request under Pennsylvania's Right to Know Law for information on who supplies Pennsylvania's execution drugs, whether or not they are stockpiled and how often the stocks are rotated was pending at press time.

The fact that the state hasn't hosted an execution in more than a decade certainly makes the situation seem less than urgent. However, according to the drug's guidelines, the average shelf life for sodium thiopental is 4 years, meaning the state would need to rotate stocks at least that frequently, or would need to order it before an execution proceeds.

Seeking to circumvent the controversy, some prisons have decided to abandon sodium thiopental altogether. Last month Ohio became the first state to execute an inmate with a single dose of pentobarbital - a short-acting barbiturate commonly used to euthanize animals -- while several others states have said they will begin using pentobarbital in place of sodium thiopental as 1 of 3 execution drugs. That decision is already raising challenges from defense attorneys who say the new drug is unproven and that some states, Texas for instance, have not followed the correct protocol for making such a change.

Meanwhile, many European governments have stepped up efforts to ensure they are not complicit in a practice they oppose. On April 1, Germany petitioned the European Union to consider banning sodium thiopental for exportation to countries where it could be used for execution, and legislators in the UK are lobbying the government to add the other 2 drugs commonly used in lethal injections -- potassium chloride and pancuronium bromide -- to the country's list of banned exports. Given European sentiment concerning capital punishment, pentobarbital may one day face the same fate. With as much as 40 % of pharmaceuticals now being made outside the United States, the implications could be reaching.

Death penalty opponents say the international outcry underscores just how isolated the U.S. is from its allies on the issue of capital punishment.

"This is a sign that it's difficult to do the business of killing people when there are others out there who don't want to participate," said Andy Hoover, Legislative Director of the Pennsylvania American Civil Liberties Union.

PA Legislators push alternate death penalty bills

The day before Sister Prejean visited Chestnut Hill, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives unanimously voted to approve a bill that -- if it passes the GOP-controlled Senate -- could see more inmates sent to death row in the Keystone State.

The legislation -- House Bill 317 -- adds two new aggravating factors to the 18 already considered when determining if the death penalty applies to defendants in murder cases, making capital punishment applicable for defendants that commit sexually violent murder while they are registered sex offenders, as well as those who target the elderly and infirm.

"The House is just completely out of step with reality," said Hoover, commenting on the bill. "They are refusing to accept that this is a broken program. The death penalty was made to be used in limited circumstances, but by adding a category for people that are infirm, which lacks definition, the House is expanding it to where it can be applied to most homicides."

The bill's sponsor, Rep. Kerry Benninghoff, a Republican representing parts of Centre and Mifflin Counties, didn't respond to calls and e-mails seeking comment, but in a statement he said the bill is about "justice, protecting law-abiding citizens and keeping dangerous people off the streets."

Two Democratic senators -- Allegheny County progressive Jim Ferlo, and Daylin Leach -- who represents parts of Delaware and Montgomery Counties -- are seeking to end capital punishment in the Commonwealth.

According to Leach, who in February introduced a bill to place a statewide moratorium on executions, the cost of putting people on Death Row where they'll sit for years through endless appeals just doesn't make any sense given the budget crisis currently facing the state. Studies show it costs more than twice as much in appeals, administration and housing to put an inmate to death than to house him or her for the rest of their lives, while polls show waning support across the nation for the death penalty. The most recent numbers in Pennsylvania show that less than half of respondents favor the death penalty when given the alternative option if life without parole.

"The Death Penalty is just another government program that is too expensive and just not working," said Leach, in an appeal to his conservative colleagues.

Since Pennsylvania reinstated the death penalty in 1977, only three executions have been carried out (the last a dozen years ago), and in all three cases the defendants waved their appeals. It's been nearly half a century since the state executed someone who didn't ask to be. Since then at least 20 condemned inmates have died of natural causes.

Nonetheless, Pennsylvania governors from both parties continue to sign dozens of death warrants, making Pennsylvania's Death Row the fourth largest in the nation. Governor Ed Rendell, a Democrat, signed 119 death warrants during his tenure; and newly minted Republican Governor Tom Corbett has already signed four since taking office in January. There are currently 222 inmates awaiting their execution date, more than half of them Black men from Philadelphia County.

Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams supports the death penalty but has said he will use it more conservatively than his predecessor Lynn Abraham, who gained a reputation for aggressively pursuing capital murder charges.

According to Tasha Jamerson, a spokesperson for Williams, the DA's office has filed 11 capital cases since Williams took office, and Jamerson reports a "steady decrease in capital prosecutions since 2003."

The American Bar Association has a theory as to why the Keystone State carries out so few executions despite having so many condemned: Pennsylvania is the only state in the nation that provides no post-conviction financial support for defense appeals, meaning defendants are often required to turn to county services and the aid of less-than-able court-appointed attorneys. As a result, cases are often wildly mismanaged, and regularly overturned on appeal at the expense of taxpayers.

Since 1980, more than 200 death sentences in Pennsylvania have been overturned by federal and state courts, and nearly as many death convictions are vacated in Pennsylvania each year as are handed down.

As states across the country rethink their stance on capital punishment, it's fallen to a handful of "true believers" -like Florida, Texas and Ohio to conduct the majority of America's executions. How long Pennsylvania will continue to count itself among this group remains to be seen, but advocates are confident it's not a matter of if, but when the state will abolish capital punishment.

"It might not be on the first try, it might not be on the second try, but if people keep the pressure on eventually we can change this," said Prejean. "Politicians do eventually listen to the people."

A coalition of 15 statewide abolitionist groups, including Pennsylvanians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (PADP), The Interfaith Alliance of Pennsylvania, Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights, and the ACLU of Pennsylvania is working hard to see that that they do.

"I think with many changes, it's a question of chipping away, little by little and day by day," said Kathleen Lucas, executive director for PADP. "We will get there. Once our legislators see how broken the system is, I believe that they'll do the right thing. The evidence is on our side."

Source: alternet.org, April 16, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Effort is on to speed up Nevada death penalty cases

The execution chamber at Nevada State
Prison in Carson City
Reno police undercover narcotics officer Jimmy Hoff was about to make his last and biggest career drug bust before returning to patrol as a K-9 officer.

Instead, the 32-year-old was fatally stabbed June 24, 1979, during an ambush at Idlewild Park that was planned and practiced by 4 young men whose aim was to rob him of $16,000 in cocaine money.

32 years after a 3-judge panel sentenced the ringleader, Thomas Edward Wilson, to death, he remains Nevada’s longest standing death row inmate, to the dismay of Hoff’s surviving relatives and the original police investigators.

The delay is the result of appeals filed on his behalf ­— which for more than 3 decades have been denied by local, state and federal courts. Most, including an oral argument to the state high court last month, seek the same claims for relief.

Wilson pleaded guilty to Hoff’s 1st-degree murder, and his three accomplices are serving sentences of life without parole.

In Wilson’s appeal denials, judges have written there had been “overwhelming” evidence of guilt in the “premeditated” murder that was committed to rob Officer Hoff and receive his money.

State Sen. Don Gustavson, R-Sparks, and a group of retired Reno police detectives will be testifying Friday morning during a state Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on behalf of Senate Bill 283, which Gustavson hopes will help shave at least a few years off of “meritless” death penalty appeals so that inmates like Wilson don’t linger on death row for decades.

A death sentence is automatically appealed to the Nevada Supreme Court; all other appeals are voluntary. In 2010, the average time spent on death row in Nevada was about 17 years, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

The U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled that states are not required to provide attorneys in postconviction appeals. Nevada law mandates it, leaving judges no choice but to appoint a new attorney.

Gustavson’s amendment to the state’s law on death penalty appeals would give judges discretion in appointing new lawyers, either when an inmate seeks to raise legal issues that mostly were denied in the past or claims that prior attorneys were ineffective.

“The current system for dealing with capital appeals is dysfunctional, and the limited judicial resources of our courts is promising years of delay at the expense of the families’ victims who deserve finality and closure,” Gustavson said Thursday.

But others said that this bill won’t fix Nevada’s death row problems and could keep innocent people on death row.

“We believe it would likely violate constitutional protections, such as equal protection and the Sixth Amendment,” Washoe County Public Defender Jeremy Bosler said.

Victim’s family

Hoff’s siblings — Patty Rowan of Las Vegas, Dennis George of Reno, and Sandra Hutchison of Woodland, Calif. — support the proposal because they said Nevada’s death penalty does not work, delaying justice.

82 inmates are on death row in Nevada, according to the Nevada Department of Corrections. The state’s last execution was in 2006, and that was only because the executed inmate, Reno serial killer Daryl Mack, gave up his appeals.

“I worry they won’t execute him in my lifetime,” Rowan, 73, said of Wilson.

Rowan said their mother, Lucille, died in 1997 brokenhearted because Wilson had still not faced justice.

“That would make my life worth dying for,” Rowan said. “When he got death, I thought it was a good sentence and he wouldn’t be allowed to live. This has been going on way too long and there’s gotta be a law that says ‘this is enough’ Families have to suffer through this, and it’s horrible for all of them. We’ve got to fix the law."

George and Hutchison said they are disappointed Wilson remains on death row.

“I believe in a life for a life,” Hutchison said. “It’s so annoying to me that here it’s been 32 years and he’s still hanging in there. It makes no sense. I don’t know a lot about the judicial system but it seems that after a certain amount of time something should be done. Nevada doesn’t do anything."

Opponents: This isn’t the fix

But not everyone is convinced that the proposal is the right way to solve the problem.

Washoe County Public Defender Jeremy Bosler said his office supports the need for speedy justice, but there is an even greater need for accuracy.

He said that in recent years, hundreds of death row inmates across the country have been exonerated following a closer look at their cases — even though juries determined there had been overwhelming evidence against them.

State and federal courts also affirmed many of those convictions, yet years later, evidence was discovered that forced prosecutors to dismiss charges, he said.

“The idea that at the end of this complex litigation, a court, or some other government officer, is given the discretion to decide if a person facing execution should have a lawyer to prepare a direct appeal does not comport with our country’s fundamental rights of due process,” Bosler said.

And while Washoe County District Attorney Richard Gammick, a Republican, said he supports the death penalty for deserving killers, he’s not so sure changing the state law would make a difference. He said the federal 9th Circuit Appeals Court would have to agree the changes are constitutional; otherwise, the cases would continue to be sent back to lower courts for new hearings.

“They’re not even close to solving the problem,” Gammick said of the proposal’s affect on reducing languishing death penalty appeals.

Supporters: Money could be saved, justice served.

Retired Reno police detectives Wayne Teglia, who approached Gustavson to introduce the bill, and Dave Jenkins said the general public likely isn’t aware of inmates languishing on death row for decades, even though juries and judicial panels voted they were the “worst of the worst” and deserve death.

Both said the proposal is not a moral debate about the death penalty. Instead, it’s about carrying out a legal sentence made available by the state Legislature. They also said that in this recession, it’s simply too expensive to allow taxpayer money to be wasted on legal fees associated with senseless appeals.

“It’s a slap in the face of justice when sentences never get carried out,” Jenkins said. “Right now, it’s a system of a process of no ends and a lack of respect for the verdict. How can you have a just process when if 32 years later, you are still on death row? There is something fundamentally wrong with the system."

Teglia said Wilson isn’t the only local murderer languishing on death row. He pointed to Ricky Sechrest, who was sentenced to die in 1983 for kidnapping and killing two young girls in Reno; Siaosi Vanisi, sentenced to die in 1999 for the hatchet slaying of a University of Nevada, Reno officer; and serial killer David Middleton, who was sentenced in 1997 for the deaths of 2 women in Reno.

“These guys are guilty as sin, and some have confessed,” said Teglia, an original investigator in the Hoff killing. “The chance of error on death row with a guilty conviction is very hard now that DNA is so advanced. Now, victims’ rights are not considered. The Nevada Legislature created this problem, and only they can fix it."

Source: Reno Gazette-Journal, April 8, 2011


A closer look

Senate Bill 283

What it does: Introduced by state Sen. Don Gustavson, R-Sparks, this bill aims to reduce some death penalty appeals by giving local judges discretion to keep appointing new lawyers to file new appeals, instead of mandating them by law.

Supporters say: Death-row inmates would not be able to abuse the appeal process as much, and would cut down the number of years they would be on death row. It could save the state money — possibly millions — in legal fees associated with endless appeals. A change would help ensure that a legal sentence was carried out for the benefit of victims, their families and the community. The U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled that states are not required to appoint attorneys in post conviction proceedings.

Critics say: Appeals are part of a person’s right to due process and should be left alone. Previous death-row exonerations across the country proved that later appeals provided evidence that proved the person was innocent. Any change in the law would also face scrutiny from the federal 9th Circuit Appeals Court, which could not accept the change and kick the case back to a lower court for more hearings.

What’s next

Senate Judiciary Committee hearing today.

Death row costs

The cost each year of housing Nevada’s 82 death-row inmates is about $2.1 million, said the Nevada Department of Corrections. While no current data were available, it was estimated in 2001 it costs the state between $2.5 to $5 million per death row inmate, compared to about $760,000 for an inmate sentenced to a life in prison without parole.

Death penalty appeals are conducted at state and federal courts. A death sentence is automatically appealed to the Nevada Supreme Court, while subsequent appeals are voluntary. According to Nevada Supreme Court appeals filings, Thomas Edward Wilson’s defense fees are more than $3,000 per month when he has an active appeal in that court.

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, in 2008, California concluded it spent $137 million a year on its death-penalty system, compared to spending $11.5 million a year to fund an inmate’s life-in-prison term without parole.

Other states, the center said, found that costs to its indigent court services were so extraordinary that there were not enough resources to defend capital cases, such was the case in New Mexico. Other states such as New Jersey and New York also spent millions each year while having no executions.

Last month, Illinois became the 16th state to abolish the death penalty, after several death row inmates were exonerated throughout the last several years. Its last execution was 11 years ago.

Source: Reno Gazette-Journal, April 8, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Friday, April 8, 2011

South Dakota buys death penalty drug

National shortage prompts purchase for 2 executions

South Dakota has bought a new supply of the drug that the state uses in executions because of reports of a national shortage.

Officials spent $5,000 to acquire enough sodium thiopental for the lethal injections of convicted killers Donald E. Moeller and Charles Russell Rhines. The drug is under storage at the state penitentiary in Sioux Falls, said Sara Rabern, public information officer for the attorney general's office.

Moeller and Rhines have appeals pending. Neither has an execution date, but the state is preparing because of reports supply of the drug would run low.

"This is a proactive response to a national shortfall," Attorney General Marty Jackley said Wednesday. "We're not in a situation where we need to use it. But the main goal is to obtain the drug ... and to keep legal custody of it."

Death penalty opponents consider the purchase a chapter from the theater of the absurd.

"To run out and buy it to try to get the last item on the shelf is just grotesque," said Jeanne Koster of Watertown, former director of the South Dakota Peace and Justice Center.

Moeller was convicted of the 1990 rape and murder of 9-year-old Rebecca O'Connell of Sioux Falls.

Rhines was convicted of killing 22-year-old Donnivan Schaeffer in a 1992 burglary of the Rapid City doughnut shop where Schaeffer worked.

The state's last execution was in 2007, when Elijah Page died by injection for torturing and killing Chester Allan Poage in 2000 in Lawrence County. That was South Dakota's 1st execution since George Sitts died in 1947 in the electric chair. A judge also sentenced Briley Piper to death for his role in killing Poage, but the Supreme Court in 2009 sent his case back to circuit court for a jury to decide Piper's sentence.

Source: Argus Leader, April 7, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Friday, March 25, 2011

Texas: House Committee Set to Hear Repeal Bill

Polunsky Unit, Texas
(Austin, Texas) — On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee will hold a public hearing on House Bill (HB) 819, which calls for the repeal of the death penalty in Texas. The hearing will take place at the State Capitol in the John H. Reagan Building (JHR) 120 (upon final adjournment/recess of the House).

“National momentum is clearly shifting in the direction of abolition,” said State Representative Jessica Farrar, the author of HB 819, along with State Representatives Marisa Marquez and Alma Allen. “Earlier this month, Illinois became the 16th state, and the 4th in recent years, to abandon the death penalty. In addition, elected officials in at least 12 other states are considering repeal legislation this year. This hearing provides members of the Texas House of Representatives with the opportunity to engage in open dialogue about the flaws and failures of our state’s capital punishment system.”

Rep. Farrar first introduced this bill – which strikes the death penalty as a sentencing option from all relevant sections of the Texas Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure and replaces it with life in prison without the possibility of parole – in 2007. In 2009, the Subcommittee on Capital Punishment of the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee considered testimony from attorneys, religious leaders, academics, and individuals impacted directly by violent crime. Among those scheduled to testify before the full committee this year are:

* Chris Castillo, National Outreach Coordinator for Murder Victims’ Families for Reconciliation. Chris’s mother, Pilar Castillo, was murdered in Houston in 1991; to date, no one has been held accountable for this crime.

* Reverend Carroll Pickett, a Presbyterian minister who served as the death house chaplain at the Walls Unit in Huntsville for 15 years and accompanied 95 men to their deaths by execution. He was present for the first U.S. execution by lethal injection, when Charlie Brooks was put to death in Texas on December 7, 1982.

* Professor Dennis Longmire, Sam Houston State University, who will speak about the cost of the death penalty.

“During this time of fiscal crisis, the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (TCADP) urges all elected officials to take a good hard look at the death penalty system and ask whether this is a good use of tax payers’ dollars when there are alternative ways to protect society and punish those who are truly guilty,” said Kristin Houlé, TCADP Executive Director. “We strongly endorse HB 819 and urge the members House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee to support this important legislation.”

Source: Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (TCADP), March 25, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Illinois Governor Pat Quinn signs death penalty ban, commutes 15 death row sentences to life

SPRINGFIELD — Gov. Pat Quinn today signed into law a historic ban on the death penalty in Illinois and commuted the sentences of 15 death row inmates to life without parole.

Quinn signed the legislation in his Capitol office surrounded by longtime opponents of capital punishment in a state where flaws in the process led to the exoneration of numerous people sentenced to death.

"For me, this was a difficult decision, quite literally the choice between life and death," Quinn wrote in his signing statement. "This was not a decision to be made lightly, or a decision that I came to without deep personal reflection."

"Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it," Quinn wrote. "With our broken system, we cannot ensure justice is achieved in every case."

"For the same reason, I have also decided to commute the sentences of those currently on death row to natural life imprisonment, without the possibility of parole or release," the governor wrote.

A small group of lawmakers also was on hand, including lead sponsors Rep. Karen Yarbrough, D-Maywood, and Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago. Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago, and House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, D-Chicago also attended. Lt. Gov. Sheila Simon, who lobbied Quinn to sign the ban, was there.

The ban comes about 11 years after then-Gov. George Ryan declared a moratorium on executions after 13 condemned inmates were cleared since Illinois reinstated capital punishment in 1977. Ryan, a Republican, cited a Tribune investigative series that examined each of the state's nearly 300 capital cases and exposed how bias, error and incompetence undermined many of them.

Since then, Illinois approved reforms to the capital punishment system, including taping interrogations under a proposal forged by President Barack Obama when he served in the Illinois Senate. Only two days before leaving office in January 2003, Ryan commuted the death sentences of 164 prisoners to life in prison. Quinn and his predecessor, Rod Blagojevich, kept the moratorium in place.

In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down death penalty statutes in 40 states, including Illinois. Five years later, Illinois reinstated capital punishment, and it has been among the 35 states that currently allow executions. Illinois could join New York, New Jersey and New Mexico, all of which have done away with the death penalty in the last three years.

The death penalty ban would take effect July 1.

Quinn did not have to immediately act on the 15 death row inmates, but chose to commute their sentences to life in prison.

One of them is Brian Dugan, sentenced to death for the 1983 rape and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico, of Naperville. Dugan had been serving two life sentences for two other rape-murder cases, but his death sentence brought a major chapter of a long-running, controversial case to a close. Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez — two of three men originally charged with the girl's murder — served years on death row before they were cleared.

As Quinn campaigned for governor last fall, he held firm to the moratorium as a way to see how well the reforms are working. The governor also said he supported the death penalty for the worst crimes.

Quinn made his decision after an intense lobbying effort from those on both sides of the issue.

Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan and other prosecutors urged Quinn to veto the ban and take a hard-line stance to keep the death penalty.

The governor also heard from anti-death-penalty luminaries including South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Sister Helen Prejean, a New Orleans nun whose time spent with a condemned inmate became the basis for the movie "Dead Man Walking."

Family members of murder victims also made emotional pleas. Among them was Cindy McNamara, whose daughter, Shannon, was murdered in 2001 while attending Eastern Illinois University.

Shannon McNamara was asleep in her locked off-campus apartment when she was raped, strangled, beaten and stabbed. Her body was left in the living room. A washcloth was stuffed in her mouth.

Former EIU student Anthony Mertz was convicted, becoming the first person sent to death row after Ryan emptied it.

"We have the death penalty for a reason," Cindy McNamara wrote in a letter to Quinn. "This is the reason!"

The Tribune examination found at least 46 inmates sent to death row in cases where prosecutors used jailhouse informants to convict or condemn the defendants. The investigation also found at least 33 death row inmates had been represented at trial by an attorney who had been disbarred or suspended; at least 35 African-American inmates on death row who had been convicted or condemned by an all-white jury; and about half of the nearly 300 capital cases had been reversed for a new trial or sentencing hearing.

Source: Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Illinois Becomes 4th State in Four Years to Abandon the Death Penalty

Gov. Pat Quinn signs legislation
today ending the death penalty.
Illinois Governor Pat Quinn took the final step today in ending the death penalty and replacing it with a sentence of life without parole. The law also requires that state funds used for the death penalty be transferred to a fund for murder victims’ services and law enforcement. The ban on capital punishment comes after an 11-year moratorium on executions declared by former Republican Governor George Ryan, and makes Illinois the 16th state to repeal the death penalty. It also marks the lowest number of states with the death penalty in more than 30 years.

"The Illinois repeal is an indication of a growing national trend toward alternatives to the death penalty, and an increased focus on murder victims' families and the prevention of crime," said Richard Dieter, Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center. "In light of our current economic climate, the public has increasingly recognized that resources used for the death penalty could be diverted to higher budgetary priorities, such as law enforcement and victims’ services."

Many murder victims’ families were among the strongest supporters of the Illinois repeal. In a letter to the Illinois General Assembly, murder victims' families wrote, "A legal system that wasn’t bogged down with committing tremendous resources on capital cases could prosecute and sentence countless other crimes and take dangerous people off the streets before they commit murder. Dollars saved could be put toward counseling for victims of crime or other services we desperately need as we attempt to get on with our lives." The letter was signed by more than 30 individuals who had loved ones murdered in Illinois.

The high costs of the death penalty were influential in the passage of the repeal. Conservative Republican Senator Dan Duffy of Lake Barrington said, "We have spent over $100 million of taxpayer money defending and prosecuting death row cases. The death penalty does not make our society safer, I believe. It has been an ineffective and expensive use of our scarce resources."

In the last few months, the death penalty has been under scrutiny in other states as well. Days after the Illinois General Assembly voted for the repeal, Ohio Supreme Court Justice Paul E. Pfeifer, who as a Republican state legislator played an influential role in shaping the state’s current death penalty statute, stated: “I have concluded that it is exceedingly difficult for this statute to be administered in a fair and just way… Gov. [John] Kasich and the governors after him, I believe, need to consider commuting all of those sentences to life in prison without the possibility of parole, and I think it's time for Ohio to at least entertain the discussion of whether or not we are well served by having a death penalty."

Across the country, use of the death penalty is declining as states are using alternative punishments like life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Death sentences in the United States have dropped by over 60% since the mid-90s. A recent poll conducted by Lake Research Partners showed that 61% of U.S. voters chose various alternative sentences over the death penalty as the punishment for murder. The same poll also listed the death penalty last in a list of priorities for state spending.

Since 1976, Illinois has carried out 12 executions. In the same period, 20 inmates have been exonerated from the state’s death row, the 2nd highest number in the United States. In 2003, 3 years after the moratorium was imposed, Governor Ryan issued a blanket commutation, reducing the sentences of 167 death row inmates to life and pardoning 4 inmates. Since then, Illinois has had 2 different commissions to study the death penalty and has implemented some reforms, yet continues to face an error-prone and costly system.

In the meantime, use of the death penalty has declined sharply in Illinois. In the 1990s, the state averaged over 10 death sentences a year. In 2009 and 2010, the state imposed only 1 death sentence each year.

Illinois is the 4th state in the last 4 years to abandon the death penalty. New Mexico and New Jersey voted to abolish the death penalty in 2009 and 2007, respectively. New York’s death penalty law was declared unconstitutional in 2004, and the last person was removed from death row in 2007. More states are expected to introduce legislation to repeal the death penalty in 2011, including possibly Connecticut, Kansas and Maryland.

Source: The Death Penalty Information Center is a non-profit organization serving the media and the public with analysis and information on issues concerning capital punishment. DPIC was founded in 1990 and prepares in-depth reports, issues press releases, conducts briefings for the media, and serves as a resource to those working on this issue. DPIC is widely quoted and consulted by all those concerned with the death penalty. March 9, 2011


Statement of Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights

Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights congratulates Illinois Governor Quinn on signing into law the recently passed legislation abolishing the state's death penalty. We applaud the state's decision to redirect funds formerly spent on the death penalty to services for families of homicide victims and training of law enforcement personnel. As family members of murder victims, we know that each homicide is a theft of a unique, irreplaceable, deeply loved human life, representing a world of devastation for the victim’s surviving families.

A commitment to helping these victims' families and law enforcement personnel who work to protect us is a positive step forward for Illinois.

Source: MVFHR, March 9, 2011


Community of Sant’Egidio: 'Illinois has joined the world of civilization'

It is the 16th American state in which killing is not sanctioned by law

The Community of Sant’Egidio invites Governor Pat Quinn and a delegation of the state’s House of Representatives and Senate, along with American abolition activists, to celebrate the historic event at the Coliseum in Rome

Illinois became the 16th American state to have abolished the death penalty today after Governor Pat Quinn signed the bill approved by the two houses of the State Assembly. It was an exceptional and historic day in the United States. A ten-year process leading to a stop to executions in Chicago’s state thus drew to a close, with a large bipartisan majority confirming that the death penalty is an irremediably pernicious instrument for the judicial system.

On January 6, 2011, the House of Representatives of the state of Illinois voted 60-54 in favor of the definitive abolition of capital punishment. 5 days later, on January 11, the State Senate approved the proposal with a 32-25 vote. All that was needed was the endorsement of Governor Pat Quinn, who after weighing all of the elements at his disposal put his signature on the historic document.

Illinois is the third American state to have repudiated the death penalty in the last 4 years, following New Jersey and New Mexico. This unprecedented acceleration shows how the death penalty in the United States is in difficulty and is destined to become a weapon of the past. The development of historic dimensions came just a few weeks after a stop was put to the production of sodium thiopental one of the substances used in the U.S. for lethal injection, following a campaign spearheaded by the Community of Sant’Egidio and major anti-death penalty organizations, from Reprieve to Hands off Cain, and aided by the British and Italian governments.

The Community of Sant’Egidio closely followed the campaign launched the Illinois Coalition Against the Death Penalty, coordinated by Jeremy Schroeder, as well as the initiatives of the entire American abolitionist movement It plans to celebrate the abolition of the death penalty in Illinois with a special event in Rome: the lighting of the Coliseum, international symbol of the global battle for a system of justice that respects human life at all times.

The development marks a decisive step toward abolition of the death penalty in the whole United States. In 2010 there was the lowest number of executions in the country since 1999: 46, representing a 12 % drop since the year before. 2010 was also the year in which the lowest number of death sentences were handed down in the United States since 1976: 114, 2/3 less than 15 years earlier, 1996, a record year for death sentences.

An unmistakable trend, a progressive structural decline, confirmed by the recent electoral victories of governors publicly opposed to capital punishment in California, New York State and Massachusetts. In Texas, which holds the record with 17 executions, there were less than 10 death sentences handed down. For the first time, an American judge challenged the constitutionality of the death penalty.

Precedents:

At the end of January 2000 former Governor George Ryan, a Republican, suspended all executions after it was shown that thirteen death sentences had been commuted since 1976, the year the death penalty was officially reinstated at the federal level, because the prisoners were proven innocent. That was 1 more prisoner than the 12 death row convicts proven guilty. These numbers represented an evident anomaly for capital punishment in the large American state, a manifest gap also present in all of the other states which maintain the death penalty.

The commission created by Ryan to shed full light on the dynamics of capital sentences in Illinois came to the conclusion, after 2 years of study, that no penal system can ever be so perfect as to rule out sensational judicial error. The death penalty, with its definitive and irreparable characteristic, thus inherently represents a premise for an extremely unjust punishment. Not only that. The commission also discovered how external factors, such as ethnic identity, social class, geography, the emotional susceptibility of public opinion, the ineptitude of defense lawyers, affect the use of the death penalty in the sentencing process.

In January 2003, near the end of his mandate, Governor Ryan commuted 167 death sentences to life imprisonment after discovering the large number of errors made in the respective trials. It was the 1st widespread amnesty ever declared in American death rows. Ryan’s successors kept the moratorium in effect. It was shown that it cost the state over 100 million dollars to support the few dozen remaining inmates on death row. Even for this reason alone, a growing number of American states are wondering if it is worthwhile to pursue the path of legal assassination.

Illinois “is no longer in the company of countries which commit the worst violation of human rights: it has joined the world of civilization, putting an end to the suppression of innocent lives”, commented Senator Kwame Raoul, one of the key sponsors of the anti-death penalty bill.

Source: Sant'Egidio, March 9, 2011


Capital punishment in the United States

The governor of Illinois on Wednesday signed a bill banning the death penalty in the state. The following are some facts and figures about the death penalty in the United States since 1977, when executions resumed following the lifting of a ban on the practice by the U.S. Supreme Court the previous year.

* There have been 1,242 executions in the United States since 1977. The peak year was 1999, when 98 were carried out, while no inmates were put to death in 1978 and 1980. The number of executions dropped 12 % last year to 46. 8 people have been executed so far this year.

* The year 2009, the last for which data is available, saw 112 death sentences imposed, the lowest number over the past three decades. The peak year was 1996 when 315 were handed down.

* The death penalty is sanctioned by 34 of the 50 states and the U.S. government and military -- not counting Illinois, where the ban will take effect July 1. Lethal injection is the main method used by all of the death penalty states.

* The Death Penalty Information Center said there have been 138 exonerations of death row inmates since 1973.

* Texas has been by far the most active death penalty state in the post-1976 era, with 466 executions. Virginia is a distant 2nd at 108.

* In 2008, the United States ranked fourth in the world in the number of executions carried out with 37. China carried out by far the most with 1,718, followed by Iran with 346, Saudi Arabia with 102, the United States, Pakistan with 36, and Iraq with 34.

Source: Reuters, March 9, 2011


Scott Turow: The conservative argument to abolish the death penalty

This week's abolition of the death penalty in Illinois is commonly viewed as a triumph for progressives. But some of the most persuasive arguments for doing away with capital punishment basically reflect conservative views. The last decade has seen many noted conservatives like George Will, Richard Viguerie and L. Brent Bozell III emerge as death-penalty opponents. One reason that abolition became a political possibility here was not simply because it attracted Republican votes in the House and the Senate, but because many conservatives have grown more ambivalent about the issue and less fierce in their opposition.

Here are some of the leading conservative arguments for ending executions.

The death penalty is one more government program that's failed.

This oft-quoted observation is an elaboration on comments and more than a clever turn of phrase by former Illinoisan, George Will, perhaps the nation's leading conservative columnist.

Illinois reinstituted capital punishment in 1977, after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down all prior statutory schemes as unconstitutionally arbitrary and capricious. We have now conducted a 33-year experiment in seeing whether death sentences can be meted out in a rational, proportionate fashion that has clearly failed.

I was a member of the 14-person Commission on Capital Punishment appointed by then-Gov. George Ryan in 2000 to study the death penalty. I started out ambivalent, because I knew there will always be certain murders and killers who will cry out for this ultimate form of retribution. But after two years I came to realize that we will never construct a capital system that functions with anything resembling fairness.

Despite decades of legislation and litigation aimed at establishing procedural bulwarks, the imposition of the death penalty in Illinois remained haphazard. Studies authorized by the commission found that, in Illinois, defendants were five times more likely to be sentenced to death if they committed their crimes in rural areas, as opposed to cities; twice as likely to be sentenced to death if they killed a woman; and 21/2 times more likely to be capitally sentenced for the murder of a white person, as compared to an African-American.

Worst of all is the institutional propensity to sentence innocent people to death. Since 1977, 20 people have been sentenced to death in our state only to be legally absolved of the murders that put them on death row. This reflects what I refer to as the paradox of capital punishment. We have lived with the illusion that we can reserve capital punishment for the so-called "worst of the worst," the most heinous, brutal or repetitive murders. What we have failed to realize is that those very crimes stir our deepest anxieties and outrage, and thus are hardest to deal with in the kind of rational, highly deliberative way that taking a life should require. As a result, police, prosecutors, judges and juries too often have engaged in a rush to judgment that ignores the presumption of innocence and has led now and then to the law's ultimate nightmare, condemning the innocent.

For conservatives who believe government is too large, too inefficient and too unwieldy to deliver health care, or even the mail for that matter, it should come as no surprise that government efforts to justly select those worthy of death has been a moral disaster.

The death penalty is a waste of money.

Study after study has shown that the death penalty costs far more than sentencing defendants irrevocably to life in prison without parole. That may seem counterintuitive because executions, of course, shorten prisoners lives. But the costs before that point overwhelm those savings. Most of the money is spent dealing with people like me — lawyers. Everyone recognizes that in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's famous phrase, "death is different." We want to be sure that the condemned have enjoyed every legal right before they die, and as a result we have pyramided costs: 2 defense lawyers at trial —almost always government paid because capital defendants are overwhelmingly poor — and prosecutors to match them. Then there are the endless parade of appeals and post-conviction proceedings, which typically cost the state money for more than a decade.

Of course, if the death penalty clearly served a practical purpose like saving lives, these increased costs might be worth it. But in Illinois we have experienced a steady decline in our murder rate since Gov. Ryan first declared the moratorium on executions in January 2000 that has remained in place since. Murders in the vast majority of cases are impulsive acts by people who give no thought to getting caught. Thus the idea of deterrence is largely phantom. In a state that is now $15 billion in debt we cannot afford to throw good dollars after bad on a system that exists only to do a botched job of vindicating citizens' sense of moral outrage.

The death penalty is incomaptible with the notion of limited government.

In western Europe, all of our allies have outlawed the death penalty, most them taking that step after World War II. The reason was not so much popular opposition as historical experience. In Germany, Hitler had come to power as the result of his election, and proceeded to enact a series of tyrannical laws. The fact that the horrors of the World War II sprang directly from a democracy run amok persuaded European intellectuals and politicians that the state should never have the lawful power to kill.

In the United States, we are cheerfully oblivious to those risks and with good reason. From 1998 to 2001, for example, we saw one president impeached, another empowered without a popular majority, and our nation attacked by a pernicious foreign force; never once in any of those crises did we see troops in the street. The extraordinary durability of the American democracy is one of our greatest achievements, but it is naive to believe in Sinclair Lewis' phrase that it can't happen here. The conservative-libertarian view that says that the powers of government must be strictly limited supports drawing a clear line prohibiting a democratic government from ever lawfully killing any of the citizens from whom it draws power. That way a regime that vanished its political enemies or executed despised minorities would mark itself, whatever the legal rigamorole, as an outlaw.

At the end of the day, Illinois' abolition of capital punishment is part of an evolving national recognition that the death penalty is truly un-American.

Source: Scott F. Turow, a Chicago attorney and best-selling author, was a member of the Commission on Capital Punishment; Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Statement from Governor Pat Quinn on Senate Bill 3539

Today I have signed Senate Bill 3539, which abolishes the death penalty in Illinois.
For me, this was a difficult decision, quite literally the choice between life and death. This was not a decision to be made lightly, or a decision that I came to without deep personal reflection.
Since the General Assembly passed this bill, I have met or heard from a wide variety of people on both sides of the issue. I have talked with prosecutors, judges, elected officials, religious leaders from around the world, families of murder victims, people on death row who were exonerated and ordinary citizens who have taken the time to share their thoughts with me. Their experiences, words and opinions have made a tremendous impact on my thinking, and I thank everyone who reached out on this matter.
After their guidance, as well as much thought and reflection, I have concluded that our system of imposing the death penalty is inherently flawed. The evidence presented to me by former prosecutors and judges with decades of experience in the criminal justice system has convinced me that it is impossible to devise a system that is consistent, that is free of discrimination on the basis of race, geography or economic circumstance, and that always gets it right.
As a state, we cannot tolerate the executions of innocent people because such actions strike at the very legitimacy of a government. Since 1977, Illinois has seen 20 people exonerated from death row. Seven of those were exonerated since the moratorium was imposed in 2000. That is a record that should trouble us all. To say that this is unacceptable does not even begin to express the profound regret and shame we, as a society, must bear for these failures of justice.
Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it. With our broken system, we cannot ensure justice is achieved in every case. For the same reason, I have also decided to commute the sentences of those currently on death row to natural life imprisonment, without the possibility of parole or release.
I have found no credible evidence that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on the crime of murder and that the enormous sums expended by the state in maintaining a death penalty system would be better spent on preventing crime and assisting victims’ families in overcoming their pain and grief.
To those who say that we must maintain a death penalty for the sake of the victims’ families, I say that it is impossible not to feel the pain of loss that all these families share or to understand the desire for retribution that many may hold. But, as I heard from family members who lost loved ones to murder, maintaining a flawed death penalty system will not bring back their loved ones, will not help them to heal and will not bring closure to their pain. Nothing can do that. We must instead devote our resources toward the prevention of crime and the needs of victims’ families, rather than spending more money to preserve a flawed system.
The late Cardinal Joseph Bernadin observed, “[i]n a complex, sophisticated democracy like ours, means other than the death penalty are available and can be used to protect society.” In our current criminal justice system, we can impose extremely harsh punishments when warranted. Judges can impose sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Where necessary and appropriate, the state can incarcerate convicted criminals in maximum security prisons. These means should be sufficient to satisfy our need for retribution, justice and protection.
As Governor, I took an oath to uphold our state’s Constitution and faithfully execute our laws. Honoring that oath often requires making difficult decisions, but I have found none to be as difficult as the one I made today. I recognize that some may strongly disagree with this decision, but I firmly believe that we are taking an important step forward in our history as Illinois joins the 15 other states and many nations of the world that have abolished the death penalty.


Source: Illinois Government News Network, March 9, 2011


Ryan hails death penalty abolition, calling it ‘a long time coming'

Former Gov. George Ryan, who fought aggressively to abolish the death penalty after he left office — and who issued the moratorium against state executions when he was governor — dispatched this exclusive message to the Sneed column after Gov. Quinn signed historic legislation ending executions in Illinois.

“It’s been a long time coming,” said Ryan, who is now serving a sentence for public corruption at a federal prison in Indiana.

“I’m so glad the legislation has finally passed and Gov. Quinn signed the bill. It’s the result of all the good work of those who fought long and hard in advance of anything I did to help bring this about. I just hope more states join in as well as the federal government.

“We now know with a moral certainty an innocent person will not be put to death in Illinois. I want to thank Gov. Quinn for making the right call."

Ryan’s son, Homer, who talked to his father Wednesday evening, told Sneed: “I was with my dad the night he made his decision to place a moratorium on executions in Illinois. This was not an easy decision, but it came down simply to killing an innocent person. There are flaws in every system but this is what really bothered him."

“I’m sure George was absolutely elated,” said Rob Warden, executive director of Northwestern University’s Center on Wrongful Convictions. “It was very gracious of Gov. Quinn to give George credit during his press conference,” added Warden.

A somber note: “But you know . . . even though I’m absolutely elated and never thought I’d see this happen in my lifetime, there is something very surreal about it,” said Warden. “It all happened so quickly and without much [fanfare]."

Source: Chicago Sun-Times, March 9, 20011


Gov. Pat Quinn turned to Bible and writings of late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin for difficult death penalty decision


Gov. Pat Quinn turned to the Bible for wisdom. He drew strength from the writings of the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin. And he pored over the impassioned pleas from families of murder victims who begged him to give them a chance at closure.

Finally, after 2 months of struggling with what he said is the hardest decision he's had to make as governor, Quinn decided over the weekend to abolish the death penalty in Illinois and clear out death row.

"It is impossible to create a perfect system, free of all mistakes," Quinn said Wednesday, moments after signing the death penalty ban into law. "I think it's the right and just thing to abolish the death penalty and punish those who commit heinous crimes — evil people — with life in prison without parole or any chance of release."

The governor conceded he talked to few of the families of victims of the 15 murderers on death row, and he grasped for ways to console them.

"There are no words in the English language, or any language, to ease your pain," Quinn said soberly. "I want to tell them, it's impossible, I'm sure, to ever be healed. But we want to tell all of the family members, the family of Illinois … we want to be with you. You're not alone in your grief."

It was a legacy moment for Quinn, whose historic action might end up as the foremost achievement of a governor previously noteworthy for his succession of the impeached Rod Blagojevich.

Newly elected to his own term, Quinn's decision also caps a strong liberal shift for a state that had long been known for centrist, pragmatic politics. In the last few months, Democrats led by Quinn have imposed a major income-tax increase, legalized civil unions for same-sex couples and taken the death penalty off the books.

The political impact of those measures will play out in the coming years. Quinn already is being criticized by lawmakers and prosecutors who point out that violent criminals can now kill police officers and murder multiple victims without fear of losing their own lives.

Rep. Dennis Reboletti said the "big winners" were murderers on death row.

"The people of the state of Illinois aren't the winners," said Reboletti, R-Elmhurst.

A man of Catholic faith, Quinn cited Bernardin's own words: "In a complex, sophisticated democracy like ours, means other than the death penalty are available and can be used to protect society."

Life sentences to maximum security prisons, Quinn said, "should be sufficient to satisfy our need for retribution, justice and protection."

The governor called it impossible to create a justice system "free of all discrimination with respect to race or economic circumstances or geography" in a state where 102 separate state's attorneys impose different standards. And he weighed what's the appropriate justice for the worst killers against how Illinois exonerated 20 people once "in grave danger" of facing an irreversible punishment.

Pressed for a deeper explanation, Quinn acknowledged that child killer John Wayne Gacy, the poster boy for why Illinois has used the death penalty, committed the heinous crimes of an "evil man."

But Quinn said a system that risks killing an innocent man "cannot stand."

One of those whose sentence was commuted is Brian Dugan, sentenced to death for the 1983 rape and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico, of Naperville. Dugan had been serving 2 life sentences for 2 other rape-murder cases, but his death sentence for Nicarico's murder had seemingly brought a measure of closure to a saga seared into the collective minds of Chicago-area residents.

Yet that chapter did not end without exposing overwhelming human mistakes. Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez — two of three men originally charged with the girl's murder — served years on death row before they were cleared.

Quinn signed the bill in his office with only a handful of leading supporters, including the chief sponsors from each chamber, Rep. Karen Yarbrough, D-Maywood, and Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago. The two clutched pens Quinn used to sign the legislation as they hugged behind the governor's wooden desk.

Tears welled in Raoul's eyes several minutes after Quinn defended his decision.

"God bless the state of Illinois. The light of God is shining," Raoul said. "Shining positively upon our state. This is a historic day. We enter into this business trying to have some impact on lives. There's no greater impact that you can have than to do something that will save a life."

Yarbrough said she once supported the death penalty but that the exonerations serve as a "painful and stirring reminder that death is an absolute penalty. Once imposed, there is no second chance, no reversal and no way to correct a mistake."

Exonerated former inmate Gordon "Randy" Steidl, who spent 17 years in prison, including 12 on death row, was among the death penalty opponents who praised Quinn.

"He made a decision today, a moral, righteous decision, when he realized that there are flaws in this system that almost took my life and 19 other men in Illinois," Steidl said.

Not everyone at the Capitol cheered, given the legislation cleared the General Assembly with only a few votes to spare in the waning days of a lame-duck session in January. Death penalty proponents already are seeking to reinstate capital punishment.

Rep. Jim Durkin, R-Western Springs, predicted Quinn's actions would haunt him if he plans to run for re-election in 2014.

Quinn chose to focus on the arguments lawmakers gave when they approved the ban. He also deflected questions on how he campaigned last fall as a death penalty supporter. Quinn had kept in place the moratorium first imposed by Republican adversary and predecessor Gov. George Ryan, who cleared death row in 2003 by commuting to life in prison the death sentences for more than 160 inmates.

But Quinn hesitated when asked to draw comparisons between his actions and those of Ryan, who is serving time in federal prison for corruption. The governor said the 2 each followed their consciences.

"I think God wants you to do it that way," Quinn said.

Source: Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Quinn ends death row at Pontiac prison

Pontiac Correctional Center
Gov. Pat Quinn signaled the end of Pontiac Correctional Center's role as home to Illinois' death row Wednesday.

Although state prison officials are not sure what will happen to the 22 cells reserved for condemned prisoners, the governor's decision to abolish the death penalty and commute the sentences of the 15 men on who reside there will symbolically and physically alter the makeup of the 140-year-old lockup.

Quinn's landmark move also will end Dwight Correctional Center's role as the designated death row for women and eliminate Tamms Correctional Center as the home of the state's execution chamber, last used in 1999 when Andrew Kokoraleis was executed by lethal injection.

The formal abolition will go into effect on July 1, meaning death row will technically remain in place until then.

The 15 residents of the gallery whose sentences were commuted to life in prison without the possibility of release eventually will be moved into other units.

"I know they will stay in a maximum-security facility," said Illinois Department of Corrections spokeswoman Sharyn Elman.

John Maki, executive director of the John Howard Association, a prison watchdog group, was on a team surveying Pontiac on Jan. 11 -- the day the Illinois Senate approved the death penalty abolition.

He said condemned prisoners were curious about what the abolition would mean for their sentences, which are served in isolation from the general prison population.

Elman could provide no timetable for when the prisoners would be moved out of their current cells, but Maki said the inmates should be prepared for significant changes, including possibly having to share a cell with another inmate.

"Their life in prison arguably gets worse," Maki said.

At least one state lawmaker said Pontiac officials should be given clear directions on what to do with the inmates.

"Those correctional facilities need to know what to do with those death row inmates and transition them to wherever they will be housed to comply with the law as it stands now," said state Rep. Jason Barickman, R-Champaign, who represents Pontiac.

Elman said it is too early to know how the emptied space will be used. For the most part, the section set aside for condemned inmates looks similar to the rest of the 1,650-inmate facility.

"It's basically indistinguishable from other parts of the prison," said Maki.

There is no official space dedicated to a female version of death row at Dwight because there were no women sentenced to death at the time of Quinn's action.

If there were, however, Elman said they too would be separated by sight and sound from other inmates.

Source: Bloomington Pantagraph, March 9, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

California: Federal judge set to tour new San Quentin death chamber

San Quentin's new death chamber,
"built for nearly $900,000 and designed
solely for lethal injections".
Nearly 5 years ago, a San Jose federal judge went on a highly unusual expedition to San Quentin's aging death chamber, eventually finding that the converted eerie green gas chamber was outdated and replete with potential problems for carrying out executions.

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel will return to San Quentin, this time for a tour of the state's new and untested death chamber, built for nearly $900,000 and designed solely for lethal injections. With the visit, California will take a step toward resolving whether it can resume executions on a death row now brimming with nearly 720 inmates.

But it may prove to be a small step.

Major questions continue to surround the state's effort to revise its lethal injection procedures and end a court showdown that began in February 2006. Five years after giving death row inmate Michael Morales a late reprieve and putting executions on hold, Fogel still appears to have a lot of work to do before California prison officials can start escorting condemned killers into that new execution chamber.

Questions remain

California officials must show they've addressed Fogel's previous concerns that the state's execution method was "broken," from poor training of execution team members to an antiquated death chamber. The state, under orders from former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, spent years revising its lethal injection procedures -- and now Fogel is reviewing whether the state has done enough to ensure it can carry out humane executions.

The judge's latest review starts with the trip to San Quentin, where he'll be accompanied by state prison officials, lawyers and f5 news organizations, including the Mercury News. The state unveiled the new chamber last fall, hoping to rectify the problems Fogel identified in his 2006 findings.

"The tour of the chamber is still relevant," said Elisabeth Semel, head of Boalt Hall School of Law's death penalty clinic. "The question remains whether the state has answered the questions that Judge Fogel had in 2006. The questions he had "... are very much on the table."

Drug complications

While the California case is the most exhaustive to unfold in the courts, the debate over lethal injection continues to simmer across the country. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Kentucky's three-drug fatal cocktail in a major 2008 ruling that set the guidelines for lethal injection procedures, but many states continue to struggle with moving executions forward.

The issue has been complicated in the past year by the inability of states to secure a supply of sodium thiopental, the anesthesia used as the first drug in the three-drug combination used by California and most other states. The sole U.S. supplier of the drug has stopped producing it, and states such as California have gone overseas to get fresh doses, prompting critics to say they are getting the anesthesia from unreliable back-alley suppliers in Europe and putting inmates at risk of cruel executions.

California ran out of the drug on the eve of Albert Greenwood Brown's execution last fall, but has restocked through 2014 if the courts permit executions to resume.

In the meantime, Ohio and Washington have abandoned the use of three-drug combinations and sodium thiopental altogether, turning to fatal doses of pentobarbital, a surgical sedative, to carry out executions. Fogel, in evaluating California's new procedures, has hinted that may be a better option for California, but for now, state officials say the new procedure is constitutional and that executions should resume immediately.

Condemned await fate

Death penalty supporters insist California's method complies with the Supreme Court's standards. If executions resume, at least a half dozen inmates have exhausted their appeals, including condemned Santa Clara County killer David Allen Raley.

"I think we have a protocol that is constitutional," said Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, "and a stock of drugs to carry it out."

John Grele, a lawyer for 2 death row inmates challenging the method, said the state has not fixed its problem.

"What they did was take the old procedure and put a new label on it," he said.

As for Tuesday's trip to San Quentin, Grele added:

"We'll see when we get there. This is the 1st time we've been permitted to inspect it."

Source: Mercury News, Feb. 7, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.