Showing posts with label Closure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Closure. Show all posts

Monday, April 18, 2011

Tennessee may change execution method

Drug shortage means TN must change its method of execution or drop the death penalty

Tennessee has 86 killers on death row and no way to execute them after the state’s supply of a key lethal injection drug was seized by the federal government.

Now, Tennessee has to make a death penalty decision.

If it doesn’t change its lethal injection drug or the legislature doesn’t pass a law allowing the state to use alternative means of executions — electrocution, hanging, gas chamber or some other method — death row inmates will remain indefinitely imprisoned and families of murder victims will be left waiting for final punishment to be meted out.

“It’s extremely frustrating. We are carrying on our lives, but it’s just such a heavy burden,” said Misti Ellis, whose father, Jerry Hopper, was killed in a shooting rampage in 2005 in Jackson. “I hope that it’s a procedural bump in the road. I hope they can find some way to resolve it or find a new method. I certainly would not want to see, for myself or any other family that feels the same way, to have that changed because of a supply problem.”

Hopper’s killer, David Jordan, 47, is second in line to be executed this year. He is scheduled to die Sept. 27.

In less than five months, the state is set to start executing death row inmates like Jordan again. But a nationwide shortage of that key drug used in lethal injections has largely ground to a halt executions across the nation. Like other states, Tennessee has had to turn over its stock of sodium thiopental to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration because of allegations it may have been illegally obtained from an unregulated overseas supplier.

Neither Gov. Bill Haslam’s office or the Tennessee Department of Correction would say what the state would do to fix the state’s death penalty quandary.

“The commissioner isn't prepared to discuss what will happen next. He is still reviewing our options,” said Dorinda Carter, spokeswoman for the Department of Correction. When asked about those options, she responded, “He’s not ready to discuss them at this point.”

Source: The Tennessean, April 17, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Effort is on to speed up Nevada death penalty cases

The execution chamber at Nevada State
Prison in Carson City
Reno police undercover narcotics officer Jimmy Hoff was about to make his last and biggest career drug bust before returning to patrol as a K-9 officer.

Instead, the 32-year-old was fatally stabbed June 24, 1979, during an ambush at Idlewild Park that was planned and practiced by 4 young men whose aim was to rob him of $16,000 in cocaine money.

32 years after a 3-judge panel sentenced the ringleader, Thomas Edward Wilson, to death, he remains Nevada’s longest standing death row inmate, to the dismay of Hoff’s surviving relatives and the original police investigators.

The delay is the result of appeals filed on his behalf ­— which for more than 3 decades have been denied by local, state and federal courts. Most, including an oral argument to the state high court last month, seek the same claims for relief.

Wilson pleaded guilty to Hoff’s 1st-degree murder, and his three accomplices are serving sentences of life without parole.

In Wilson’s appeal denials, judges have written there had been “overwhelming” evidence of guilt in the “premeditated” murder that was committed to rob Officer Hoff and receive his money.

State Sen. Don Gustavson, R-Sparks, and a group of retired Reno police detectives will be testifying Friday morning during a state Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on behalf of Senate Bill 283, which Gustavson hopes will help shave at least a few years off of “meritless” death penalty appeals so that inmates like Wilson don’t linger on death row for decades.

A death sentence is automatically appealed to the Nevada Supreme Court; all other appeals are voluntary. In 2010, the average time spent on death row in Nevada was about 17 years, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

The U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled that states are not required to provide attorneys in postconviction appeals. Nevada law mandates it, leaving judges no choice but to appoint a new attorney.

Gustavson’s amendment to the state’s law on death penalty appeals would give judges discretion in appointing new lawyers, either when an inmate seeks to raise legal issues that mostly were denied in the past or claims that prior attorneys were ineffective.

“The current system for dealing with capital appeals is dysfunctional, and the limited judicial resources of our courts is promising years of delay at the expense of the families’ victims who deserve finality and closure,” Gustavson said Thursday.

But others said that this bill won’t fix Nevada’s death row problems and could keep innocent people on death row.

“We believe it would likely violate constitutional protections, such as equal protection and the Sixth Amendment,” Washoe County Public Defender Jeremy Bosler said.

Victim’s family

Hoff’s siblings — Patty Rowan of Las Vegas, Dennis George of Reno, and Sandra Hutchison of Woodland, Calif. — support the proposal because they said Nevada’s death penalty does not work, delaying justice.

82 inmates are on death row in Nevada, according to the Nevada Department of Corrections. The state’s last execution was in 2006, and that was only because the executed inmate, Reno serial killer Daryl Mack, gave up his appeals.

“I worry they won’t execute him in my lifetime,” Rowan, 73, said of Wilson.

Rowan said their mother, Lucille, died in 1997 brokenhearted because Wilson had still not faced justice.

“That would make my life worth dying for,” Rowan said. “When he got death, I thought it was a good sentence and he wouldn’t be allowed to live. This has been going on way too long and there’s gotta be a law that says ‘this is enough’ Families have to suffer through this, and it’s horrible for all of them. We’ve got to fix the law."

George and Hutchison said they are disappointed Wilson remains on death row.

“I believe in a life for a life,” Hutchison said. “It’s so annoying to me that here it’s been 32 years and he’s still hanging in there. It makes no sense. I don’t know a lot about the judicial system but it seems that after a certain amount of time something should be done. Nevada doesn’t do anything."

Opponents: This isn’t the fix

But not everyone is convinced that the proposal is the right way to solve the problem.

Washoe County Public Defender Jeremy Bosler said his office supports the need for speedy justice, but there is an even greater need for accuracy.

He said that in recent years, hundreds of death row inmates across the country have been exonerated following a closer look at their cases — even though juries determined there had been overwhelming evidence against them.

State and federal courts also affirmed many of those convictions, yet years later, evidence was discovered that forced prosecutors to dismiss charges, he said.

“The idea that at the end of this complex litigation, a court, or some other government officer, is given the discretion to decide if a person facing execution should have a lawyer to prepare a direct appeal does not comport with our country’s fundamental rights of due process,” Bosler said.

And while Washoe County District Attorney Richard Gammick, a Republican, said he supports the death penalty for deserving killers, he’s not so sure changing the state law would make a difference. He said the federal 9th Circuit Appeals Court would have to agree the changes are constitutional; otherwise, the cases would continue to be sent back to lower courts for new hearings.

“They’re not even close to solving the problem,” Gammick said of the proposal’s affect on reducing languishing death penalty appeals.

Supporters: Money could be saved, justice served.

Retired Reno police detectives Wayne Teglia, who approached Gustavson to introduce the bill, and Dave Jenkins said the general public likely isn’t aware of inmates languishing on death row for decades, even though juries and judicial panels voted they were the “worst of the worst” and deserve death.

Both said the proposal is not a moral debate about the death penalty. Instead, it’s about carrying out a legal sentence made available by the state Legislature. They also said that in this recession, it’s simply too expensive to allow taxpayer money to be wasted on legal fees associated with senseless appeals.

“It’s a slap in the face of justice when sentences never get carried out,” Jenkins said. “Right now, it’s a system of a process of no ends and a lack of respect for the verdict. How can you have a just process when if 32 years later, you are still on death row? There is something fundamentally wrong with the system."

Teglia said Wilson isn’t the only local murderer languishing on death row. He pointed to Ricky Sechrest, who was sentenced to die in 1983 for kidnapping and killing two young girls in Reno; Siaosi Vanisi, sentenced to die in 1999 for the hatchet slaying of a University of Nevada, Reno officer; and serial killer David Middleton, who was sentenced in 1997 for the deaths of 2 women in Reno.

“These guys are guilty as sin, and some have confessed,” said Teglia, an original investigator in the Hoff killing. “The chance of error on death row with a guilty conviction is very hard now that DNA is so advanced. Now, victims’ rights are not considered. The Nevada Legislature created this problem, and only they can fix it."

Source: Reno Gazette-Journal, April 8, 2011


A closer look

Senate Bill 283

What it does: Introduced by state Sen. Don Gustavson, R-Sparks, this bill aims to reduce some death penalty appeals by giving local judges discretion to keep appointing new lawyers to file new appeals, instead of mandating them by law.

Supporters say: Death-row inmates would not be able to abuse the appeal process as much, and would cut down the number of years they would be on death row. It could save the state money — possibly millions — in legal fees associated with endless appeals. A change would help ensure that a legal sentence was carried out for the benefit of victims, their families and the community. The U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled that states are not required to appoint attorneys in post conviction proceedings.

Critics say: Appeals are part of a person’s right to due process and should be left alone. Previous death-row exonerations across the country proved that later appeals provided evidence that proved the person was innocent. Any change in the law would also face scrutiny from the federal 9th Circuit Appeals Court, which could not accept the change and kick the case back to a lower court for more hearings.

What’s next

Senate Judiciary Committee hearing today.

Death row costs

The cost each year of housing Nevada’s 82 death-row inmates is about $2.1 million, said the Nevada Department of Corrections. While no current data were available, it was estimated in 2001 it costs the state between $2.5 to $5 million per death row inmate, compared to about $760,000 for an inmate sentenced to a life in prison without parole.

Death penalty appeals are conducted at state and federal courts. A death sentence is automatically appealed to the Nevada Supreme Court, while subsequent appeals are voluntary. According to Nevada Supreme Court appeals filings, Thomas Edward Wilson’s defense fees are more than $3,000 per month when he has an active appeal in that court.

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, in 2008, California concluded it spent $137 million a year on its death-penalty system, compared to spending $11.5 million a year to fund an inmate’s life-in-prison term without parole.

Other states, the center said, found that costs to its indigent court services were so extraordinary that there were not enough resources to defend capital cases, such was the case in New Mexico. Other states such as New Jersey and New York also spent millions each year while having no executions.

Last month, Illinois became the 16th state to abolish the death penalty, after several death row inmates were exonerated throughout the last several years. Its last execution was 11 years ago.

Source: Reno Gazette-Journal, April 8, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Illinois Governor Pat Quinn signs death penalty ban, commutes 15 death row sentences to life

SPRINGFIELD — Gov. Pat Quinn today signed into law a historic ban on the death penalty in Illinois and commuted the sentences of 15 death row inmates to life without parole.

Quinn signed the legislation in his Capitol office surrounded by longtime opponents of capital punishment in a state where flaws in the process led to the exoneration of numerous people sentenced to death.

"For me, this was a difficult decision, quite literally the choice between life and death," Quinn wrote in his signing statement. "This was not a decision to be made lightly, or a decision that I came to without deep personal reflection."

"Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it," Quinn wrote. "With our broken system, we cannot ensure justice is achieved in every case."

"For the same reason, I have also decided to commute the sentences of those currently on death row to natural life imprisonment, without the possibility of parole or release," the governor wrote.

A small group of lawmakers also was on hand, including lead sponsors Rep. Karen Yarbrough, D-Maywood, and Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago. Senate President John Cullerton, D-Chicago, and House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, D-Chicago also attended. Lt. Gov. Sheila Simon, who lobbied Quinn to sign the ban, was there.

The ban comes about 11 years after then-Gov. George Ryan declared a moratorium on executions after 13 condemned inmates were cleared since Illinois reinstated capital punishment in 1977. Ryan, a Republican, cited a Tribune investigative series that examined each of the state's nearly 300 capital cases and exposed how bias, error and incompetence undermined many of them.

Since then, Illinois approved reforms to the capital punishment system, including taping interrogations under a proposal forged by President Barack Obama when he served in the Illinois Senate. Only two days before leaving office in January 2003, Ryan commuted the death sentences of 164 prisoners to life in prison. Quinn and his predecessor, Rod Blagojevich, kept the moratorium in place.

In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down death penalty statutes in 40 states, including Illinois. Five years later, Illinois reinstated capital punishment, and it has been among the 35 states that currently allow executions. Illinois could join New York, New Jersey and New Mexico, all of which have done away with the death penalty in the last three years.

The death penalty ban would take effect July 1.

Quinn did not have to immediately act on the 15 death row inmates, but chose to commute their sentences to life in prison.

One of them is Brian Dugan, sentenced to death for the 1983 rape and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico, of Naperville. Dugan had been serving two life sentences for two other rape-murder cases, but his death sentence brought a major chapter of a long-running, controversial case to a close. Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez — two of three men originally charged with the girl's murder — served years on death row before they were cleared.

As Quinn campaigned for governor last fall, he held firm to the moratorium as a way to see how well the reforms are working. The governor also said he supported the death penalty for the worst crimes.

Quinn made his decision after an intense lobbying effort from those on both sides of the issue.

Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan and other prosecutors urged Quinn to veto the ban and take a hard-line stance to keep the death penalty.

The governor also heard from anti-death-penalty luminaries including South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Sister Helen Prejean, a New Orleans nun whose time spent with a condemned inmate became the basis for the movie "Dead Man Walking."

Family members of murder victims also made emotional pleas. Among them was Cindy McNamara, whose daughter, Shannon, was murdered in 2001 while attending Eastern Illinois University.

Shannon McNamara was asleep in her locked off-campus apartment when she was raped, strangled, beaten and stabbed. Her body was left in the living room. A washcloth was stuffed in her mouth.

Former EIU student Anthony Mertz was convicted, becoming the first person sent to death row after Ryan emptied it.

"We have the death penalty for a reason," Cindy McNamara wrote in a letter to Quinn. "This is the reason!"

The Tribune examination found at least 46 inmates sent to death row in cases where prosecutors used jailhouse informants to convict or condemn the defendants. The investigation also found at least 33 death row inmates had been represented at trial by an attorney who had been disbarred or suspended; at least 35 African-American inmates on death row who had been convicted or condemned by an all-white jury; and about half of the nearly 300 capital cases had been reversed for a new trial or sentencing hearing.

Source: Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Illinois Becomes 4th State in Four Years to Abandon the Death Penalty

Gov. Pat Quinn signs legislation
today ending the death penalty.
Illinois Governor Pat Quinn took the final step today in ending the death penalty and replacing it with a sentence of life without parole. The law also requires that state funds used for the death penalty be transferred to a fund for murder victims’ services and law enforcement. The ban on capital punishment comes after an 11-year moratorium on executions declared by former Republican Governor George Ryan, and makes Illinois the 16th state to repeal the death penalty. It also marks the lowest number of states with the death penalty in more than 30 years.

"The Illinois repeal is an indication of a growing national trend toward alternatives to the death penalty, and an increased focus on murder victims' families and the prevention of crime," said Richard Dieter, Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center. "In light of our current economic climate, the public has increasingly recognized that resources used for the death penalty could be diverted to higher budgetary priorities, such as law enforcement and victims’ services."

Many murder victims’ families were among the strongest supporters of the Illinois repeal. In a letter to the Illinois General Assembly, murder victims' families wrote, "A legal system that wasn’t bogged down with committing tremendous resources on capital cases could prosecute and sentence countless other crimes and take dangerous people off the streets before they commit murder. Dollars saved could be put toward counseling for victims of crime or other services we desperately need as we attempt to get on with our lives." The letter was signed by more than 30 individuals who had loved ones murdered in Illinois.

The high costs of the death penalty were influential in the passage of the repeal. Conservative Republican Senator Dan Duffy of Lake Barrington said, "We have spent over $100 million of taxpayer money defending and prosecuting death row cases. The death penalty does not make our society safer, I believe. It has been an ineffective and expensive use of our scarce resources."

In the last few months, the death penalty has been under scrutiny in other states as well. Days after the Illinois General Assembly voted for the repeal, Ohio Supreme Court Justice Paul E. Pfeifer, who as a Republican state legislator played an influential role in shaping the state’s current death penalty statute, stated: “I have concluded that it is exceedingly difficult for this statute to be administered in a fair and just way… Gov. [John] Kasich and the governors after him, I believe, need to consider commuting all of those sentences to life in prison without the possibility of parole, and I think it's time for Ohio to at least entertain the discussion of whether or not we are well served by having a death penalty."

Across the country, use of the death penalty is declining as states are using alternative punishments like life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Death sentences in the United States have dropped by over 60% since the mid-90s. A recent poll conducted by Lake Research Partners showed that 61% of U.S. voters chose various alternative sentences over the death penalty as the punishment for murder. The same poll also listed the death penalty last in a list of priorities for state spending.

Since 1976, Illinois has carried out 12 executions. In the same period, 20 inmates have been exonerated from the state’s death row, the 2nd highest number in the United States. In 2003, 3 years after the moratorium was imposed, Governor Ryan issued a blanket commutation, reducing the sentences of 167 death row inmates to life and pardoning 4 inmates. Since then, Illinois has had 2 different commissions to study the death penalty and has implemented some reforms, yet continues to face an error-prone and costly system.

In the meantime, use of the death penalty has declined sharply in Illinois. In the 1990s, the state averaged over 10 death sentences a year. In 2009 and 2010, the state imposed only 1 death sentence each year.

Illinois is the 4th state in the last 4 years to abandon the death penalty. New Mexico and New Jersey voted to abolish the death penalty in 2009 and 2007, respectively. New York’s death penalty law was declared unconstitutional in 2004, and the last person was removed from death row in 2007. More states are expected to introduce legislation to repeal the death penalty in 2011, including possibly Connecticut, Kansas and Maryland.

Source: The Death Penalty Information Center is a non-profit organization serving the media and the public with analysis and information on issues concerning capital punishment. DPIC was founded in 1990 and prepares in-depth reports, issues press releases, conducts briefings for the media, and serves as a resource to those working on this issue. DPIC is widely quoted and consulted by all those concerned with the death penalty. March 9, 2011


Statement of Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights

Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights congratulates Illinois Governor Quinn on signing into law the recently passed legislation abolishing the state's death penalty. We applaud the state's decision to redirect funds formerly spent on the death penalty to services for families of homicide victims and training of law enforcement personnel. As family members of murder victims, we know that each homicide is a theft of a unique, irreplaceable, deeply loved human life, representing a world of devastation for the victim’s surviving families.

A commitment to helping these victims' families and law enforcement personnel who work to protect us is a positive step forward for Illinois.

Source: MVFHR, March 9, 2011


Community of Sant’Egidio: 'Illinois has joined the world of civilization'

It is the 16th American state in which killing is not sanctioned by law

The Community of Sant’Egidio invites Governor Pat Quinn and a delegation of the state’s House of Representatives and Senate, along with American abolition activists, to celebrate the historic event at the Coliseum in Rome

Illinois became the 16th American state to have abolished the death penalty today after Governor Pat Quinn signed the bill approved by the two houses of the State Assembly. It was an exceptional and historic day in the United States. A ten-year process leading to a stop to executions in Chicago’s state thus drew to a close, with a large bipartisan majority confirming that the death penalty is an irremediably pernicious instrument for the judicial system.

On January 6, 2011, the House of Representatives of the state of Illinois voted 60-54 in favor of the definitive abolition of capital punishment. 5 days later, on January 11, the State Senate approved the proposal with a 32-25 vote. All that was needed was the endorsement of Governor Pat Quinn, who after weighing all of the elements at his disposal put his signature on the historic document.

Illinois is the third American state to have repudiated the death penalty in the last 4 years, following New Jersey and New Mexico. This unprecedented acceleration shows how the death penalty in the United States is in difficulty and is destined to become a weapon of the past. The development of historic dimensions came just a few weeks after a stop was put to the production of sodium thiopental one of the substances used in the U.S. for lethal injection, following a campaign spearheaded by the Community of Sant’Egidio and major anti-death penalty organizations, from Reprieve to Hands off Cain, and aided by the British and Italian governments.

The Community of Sant’Egidio closely followed the campaign launched the Illinois Coalition Against the Death Penalty, coordinated by Jeremy Schroeder, as well as the initiatives of the entire American abolitionist movement It plans to celebrate the abolition of the death penalty in Illinois with a special event in Rome: the lighting of the Coliseum, international symbol of the global battle for a system of justice that respects human life at all times.

The development marks a decisive step toward abolition of the death penalty in the whole United States. In 2010 there was the lowest number of executions in the country since 1999: 46, representing a 12 % drop since the year before. 2010 was also the year in which the lowest number of death sentences were handed down in the United States since 1976: 114, 2/3 less than 15 years earlier, 1996, a record year for death sentences.

An unmistakable trend, a progressive structural decline, confirmed by the recent electoral victories of governors publicly opposed to capital punishment in California, New York State and Massachusetts. In Texas, which holds the record with 17 executions, there were less than 10 death sentences handed down. For the first time, an American judge challenged the constitutionality of the death penalty.

Precedents:

At the end of January 2000 former Governor George Ryan, a Republican, suspended all executions after it was shown that thirteen death sentences had been commuted since 1976, the year the death penalty was officially reinstated at the federal level, because the prisoners were proven innocent. That was 1 more prisoner than the 12 death row convicts proven guilty. These numbers represented an evident anomaly for capital punishment in the large American state, a manifest gap also present in all of the other states which maintain the death penalty.

The commission created by Ryan to shed full light on the dynamics of capital sentences in Illinois came to the conclusion, after 2 years of study, that no penal system can ever be so perfect as to rule out sensational judicial error. The death penalty, with its definitive and irreparable characteristic, thus inherently represents a premise for an extremely unjust punishment. Not only that. The commission also discovered how external factors, such as ethnic identity, social class, geography, the emotional susceptibility of public opinion, the ineptitude of defense lawyers, affect the use of the death penalty in the sentencing process.

In January 2003, near the end of his mandate, Governor Ryan commuted 167 death sentences to life imprisonment after discovering the large number of errors made in the respective trials. It was the 1st widespread amnesty ever declared in American death rows. Ryan’s successors kept the moratorium in effect. It was shown that it cost the state over 100 million dollars to support the few dozen remaining inmates on death row. Even for this reason alone, a growing number of American states are wondering if it is worthwhile to pursue the path of legal assassination.

Illinois “is no longer in the company of countries which commit the worst violation of human rights: it has joined the world of civilization, putting an end to the suppression of innocent lives”, commented Senator Kwame Raoul, one of the key sponsors of the anti-death penalty bill.

Source: Sant'Egidio, March 9, 2011


Capital punishment in the United States

The governor of Illinois on Wednesday signed a bill banning the death penalty in the state. The following are some facts and figures about the death penalty in the United States since 1977, when executions resumed following the lifting of a ban on the practice by the U.S. Supreme Court the previous year.

* There have been 1,242 executions in the United States since 1977. The peak year was 1999, when 98 were carried out, while no inmates were put to death in 1978 and 1980. The number of executions dropped 12 % last year to 46. 8 people have been executed so far this year.

* The year 2009, the last for which data is available, saw 112 death sentences imposed, the lowest number over the past three decades. The peak year was 1996 when 315 were handed down.

* The death penalty is sanctioned by 34 of the 50 states and the U.S. government and military -- not counting Illinois, where the ban will take effect July 1. Lethal injection is the main method used by all of the death penalty states.

* The Death Penalty Information Center said there have been 138 exonerations of death row inmates since 1973.

* Texas has been by far the most active death penalty state in the post-1976 era, with 466 executions. Virginia is a distant 2nd at 108.

* In 2008, the United States ranked fourth in the world in the number of executions carried out with 37. China carried out by far the most with 1,718, followed by Iran with 346, Saudi Arabia with 102, the United States, Pakistan with 36, and Iraq with 34.

Source: Reuters, March 9, 2011


Scott Turow: The conservative argument to abolish the death penalty

This week's abolition of the death penalty in Illinois is commonly viewed as a triumph for progressives. But some of the most persuasive arguments for doing away with capital punishment basically reflect conservative views. The last decade has seen many noted conservatives like George Will, Richard Viguerie and L. Brent Bozell III emerge as death-penalty opponents. One reason that abolition became a political possibility here was not simply because it attracted Republican votes in the House and the Senate, but because many conservatives have grown more ambivalent about the issue and less fierce in their opposition.

Here are some of the leading conservative arguments for ending executions.

The death penalty is one more government program that's failed.

This oft-quoted observation is an elaboration on comments and more than a clever turn of phrase by former Illinoisan, George Will, perhaps the nation's leading conservative columnist.

Illinois reinstituted capital punishment in 1977, after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down all prior statutory schemes as unconstitutionally arbitrary and capricious. We have now conducted a 33-year experiment in seeing whether death sentences can be meted out in a rational, proportionate fashion that has clearly failed.

I was a member of the 14-person Commission on Capital Punishment appointed by then-Gov. George Ryan in 2000 to study the death penalty. I started out ambivalent, because I knew there will always be certain murders and killers who will cry out for this ultimate form of retribution. But after two years I came to realize that we will never construct a capital system that functions with anything resembling fairness.

Despite decades of legislation and litigation aimed at establishing procedural bulwarks, the imposition of the death penalty in Illinois remained haphazard. Studies authorized by the commission found that, in Illinois, defendants were five times more likely to be sentenced to death if they committed their crimes in rural areas, as opposed to cities; twice as likely to be sentenced to death if they killed a woman; and 21/2 times more likely to be capitally sentenced for the murder of a white person, as compared to an African-American.

Worst of all is the institutional propensity to sentence innocent people to death. Since 1977, 20 people have been sentenced to death in our state only to be legally absolved of the murders that put them on death row. This reflects what I refer to as the paradox of capital punishment. We have lived with the illusion that we can reserve capital punishment for the so-called "worst of the worst," the most heinous, brutal or repetitive murders. What we have failed to realize is that those very crimes stir our deepest anxieties and outrage, and thus are hardest to deal with in the kind of rational, highly deliberative way that taking a life should require. As a result, police, prosecutors, judges and juries too often have engaged in a rush to judgment that ignores the presumption of innocence and has led now and then to the law's ultimate nightmare, condemning the innocent.

For conservatives who believe government is too large, too inefficient and too unwieldy to deliver health care, or even the mail for that matter, it should come as no surprise that government efforts to justly select those worthy of death has been a moral disaster.

The death penalty is a waste of money.

Study after study has shown that the death penalty costs far more than sentencing defendants irrevocably to life in prison without parole. That may seem counterintuitive because executions, of course, shorten prisoners lives. But the costs before that point overwhelm those savings. Most of the money is spent dealing with people like me — lawyers. Everyone recognizes that in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's famous phrase, "death is different." We want to be sure that the condemned have enjoyed every legal right before they die, and as a result we have pyramided costs: 2 defense lawyers at trial —almost always government paid because capital defendants are overwhelmingly poor — and prosecutors to match them. Then there are the endless parade of appeals and post-conviction proceedings, which typically cost the state money for more than a decade.

Of course, if the death penalty clearly served a practical purpose like saving lives, these increased costs might be worth it. But in Illinois we have experienced a steady decline in our murder rate since Gov. Ryan first declared the moratorium on executions in January 2000 that has remained in place since. Murders in the vast majority of cases are impulsive acts by people who give no thought to getting caught. Thus the idea of deterrence is largely phantom. In a state that is now $15 billion in debt we cannot afford to throw good dollars after bad on a system that exists only to do a botched job of vindicating citizens' sense of moral outrage.

The death penalty is incomaptible with the notion of limited government.

In western Europe, all of our allies have outlawed the death penalty, most them taking that step after World War II. The reason was not so much popular opposition as historical experience. In Germany, Hitler had come to power as the result of his election, and proceeded to enact a series of tyrannical laws. The fact that the horrors of the World War II sprang directly from a democracy run amok persuaded European intellectuals and politicians that the state should never have the lawful power to kill.

In the United States, we are cheerfully oblivious to those risks and with good reason. From 1998 to 2001, for example, we saw one president impeached, another empowered without a popular majority, and our nation attacked by a pernicious foreign force; never once in any of those crises did we see troops in the street. The extraordinary durability of the American democracy is one of our greatest achievements, but it is naive to believe in Sinclair Lewis' phrase that it can't happen here. The conservative-libertarian view that says that the powers of government must be strictly limited supports drawing a clear line prohibiting a democratic government from ever lawfully killing any of the citizens from whom it draws power. That way a regime that vanished its political enemies or executed despised minorities would mark itself, whatever the legal rigamorole, as an outlaw.

At the end of the day, Illinois' abolition of capital punishment is part of an evolving national recognition that the death penalty is truly un-American.

Source: Scott F. Turow, a Chicago attorney and best-selling author, was a member of the Commission on Capital Punishment; Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Statement from Governor Pat Quinn on Senate Bill 3539

Today I have signed Senate Bill 3539, which abolishes the death penalty in Illinois.
For me, this was a difficult decision, quite literally the choice between life and death. This was not a decision to be made lightly, or a decision that I came to without deep personal reflection.
Since the General Assembly passed this bill, I have met or heard from a wide variety of people on both sides of the issue. I have talked with prosecutors, judges, elected officials, religious leaders from around the world, families of murder victims, people on death row who were exonerated and ordinary citizens who have taken the time to share their thoughts with me. Their experiences, words and opinions have made a tremendous impact on my thinking, and I thank everyone who reached out on this matter.
After their guidance, as well as much thought and reflection, I have concluded that our system of imposing the death penalty is inherently flawed. The evidence presented to me by former prosecutors and judges with decades of experience in the criminal justice system has convinced me that it is impossible to devise a system that is consistent, that is free of discrimination on the basis of race, geography or economic circumstance, and that always gets it right.
As a state, we cannot tolerate the executions of innocent people because such actions strike at the very legitimacy of a government. Since 1977, Illinois has seen 20 people exonerated from death row. Seven of those were exonerated since the moratorium was imposed in 2000. That is a record that should trouble us all. To say that this is unacceptable does not even begin to express the profound regret and shame we, as a society, must bear for these failures of justice.
Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it. With our broken system, we cannot ensure justice is achieved in every case. For the same reason, I have also decided to commute the sentences of those currently on death row to natural life imprisonment, without the possibility of parole or release.
I have found no credible evidence that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on the crime of murder and that the enormous sums expended by the state in maintaining a death penalty system would be better spent on preventing crime and assisting victims’ families in overcoming their pain and grief.
To those who say that we must maintain a death penalty for the sake of the victims’ families, I say that it is impossible not to feel the pain of loss that all these families share or to understand the desire for retribution that many may hold. But, as I heard from family members who lost loved ones to murder, maintaining a flawed death penalty system will not bring back their loved ones, will not help them to heal and will not bring closure to their pain. Nothing can do that. We must instead devote our resources toward the prevention of crime and the needs of victims’ families, rather than spending more money to preserve a flawed system.
The late Cardinal Joseph Bernadin observed, “[i]n a complex, sophisticated democracy like ours, means other than the death penalty are available and can be used to protect society.” In our current criminal justice system, we can impose extremely harsh punishments when warranted. Judges can impose sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Where necessary and appropriate, the state can incarcerate convicted criminals in maximum security prisons. These means should be sufficient to satisfy our need for retribution, justice and protection.
As Governor, I took an oath to uphold our state’s Constitution and faithfully execute our laws. Honoring that oath often requires making difficult decisions, but I have found none to be as difficult as the one I made today. I recognize that some may strongly disagree with this decision, but I firmly believe that we are taking an important step forward in our history as Illinois joins the 15 other states and many nations of the world that have abolished the death penalty.


Source: Illinois Government News Network, March 9, 2011


Ryan hails death penalty abolition, calling it ‘a long time coming'

Former Gov. George Ryan, who fought aggressively to abolish the death penalty after he left office — and who issued the moratorium against state executions when he was governor — dispatched this exclusive message to the Sneed column after Gov. Quinn signed historic legislation ending executions in Illinois.

“It’s been a long time coming,” said Ryan, who is now serving a sentence for public corruption at a federal prison in Indiana.

“I’m so glad the legislation has finally passed and Gov. Quinn signed the bill. It’s the result of all the good work of those who fought long and hard in advance of anything I did to help bring this about. I just hope more states join in as well as the federal government.

“We now know with a moral certainty an innocent person will not be put to death in Illinois. I want to thank Gov. Quinn for making the right call."

Ryan’s son, Homer, who talked to his father Wednesday evening, told Sneed: “I was with my dad the night he made his decision to place a moratorium on executions in Illinois. This was not an easy decision, but it came down simply to killing an innocent person. There are flaws in every system but this is what really bothered him."

“I’m sure George was absolutely elated,” said Rob Warden, executive director of Northwestern University’s Center on Wrongful Convictions. “It was very gracious of Gov. Quinn to give George credit during his press conference,” added Warden.

A somber note: “But you know . . . even though I’m absolutely elated and never thought I’d see this happen in my lifetime, there is something very surreal about it,” said Warden. “It all happened so quickly and without much [fanfare]."

Source: Chicago Sun-Times, March 9, 20011


Gov. Pat Quinn turned to Bible and writings of late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin for difficult death penalty decision


Gov. Pat Quinn turned to the Bible for wisdom. He drew strength from the writings of the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin. And he pored over the impassioned pleas from families of murder victims who begged him to give them a chance at closure.

Finally, after 2 months of struggling with what he said is the hardest decision he's had to make as governor, Quinn decided over the weekend to abolish the death penalty in Illinois and clear out death row.

"It is impossible to create a perfect system, free of all mistakes," Quinn said Wednesday, moments after signing the death penalty ban into law. "I think it's the right and just thing to abolish the death penalty and punish those who commit heinous crimes — evil people — with life in prison without parole or any chance of release."

The governor conceded he talked to few of the families of victims of the 15 murderers on death row, and he grasped for ways to console them.

"There are no words in the English language, or any language, to ease your pain," Quinn said soberly. "I want to tell them, it's impossible, I'm sure, to ever be healed. But we want to tell all of the family members, the family of Illinois … we want to be with you. You're not alone in your grief."

It was a legacy moment for Quinn, whose historic action might end up as the foremost achievement of a governor previously noteworthy for his succession of the impeached Rod Blagojevich.

Newly elected to his own term, Quinn's decision also caps a strong liberal shift for a state that had long been known for centrist, pragmatic politics. In the last few months, Democrats led by Quinn have imposed a major income-tax increase, legalized civil unions for same-sex couples and taken the death penalty off the books.

The political impact of those measures will play out in the coming years. Quinn already is being criticized by lawmakers and prosecutors who point out that violent criminals can now kill police officers and murder multiple victims without fear of losing their own lives.

Rep. Dennis Reboletti said the "big winners" were murderers on death row.

"The people of the state of Illinois aren't the winners," said Reboletti, R-Elmhurst.

A man of Catholic faith, Quinn cited Bernardin's own words: "In a complex, sophisticated democracy like ours, means other than the death penalty are available and can be used to protect society."

Life sentences to maximum security prisons, Quinn said, "should be sufficient to satisfy our need for retribution, justice and protection."

The governor called it impossible to create a justice system "free of all discrimination with respect to race or economic circumstances or geography" in a state where 102 separate state's attorneys impose different standards. And he weighed what's the appropriate justice for the worst killers against how Illinois exonerated 20 people once "in grave danger" of facing an irreversible punishment.

Pressed for a deeper explanation, Quinn acknowledged that child killer John Wayne Gacy, the poster boy for why Illinois has used the death penalty, committed the heinous crimes of an "evil man."

But Quinn said a system that risks killing an innocent man "cannot stand."

One of those whose sentence was commuted is Brian Dugan, sentenced to death for the 1983 rape and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico, of Naperville. Dugan had been serving 2 life sentences for 2 other rape-murder cases, but his death sentence for Nicarico's murder had seemingly brought a measure of closure to a saga seared into the collective minds of Chicago-area residents.

Yet that chapter did not end without exposing overwhelming human mistakes. Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez — two of three men originally charged with the girl's murder — served years on death row before they were cleared.

Quinn signed the bill in his office with only a handful of leading supporters, including the chief sponsors from each chamber, Rep. Karen Yarbrough, D-Maywood, and Sen. Kwame Raoul, D-Chicago. The two clutched pens Quinn used to sign the legislation as they hugged behind the governor's wooden desk.

Tears welled in Raoul's eyes several minutes after Quinn defended his decision.

"God bless the state of Illinois. The light of God is shining," Raoul said. "Shining positively upon our state. This is a historic day. We enter into this business trying to have some impact on lives. There's no greater impact that you can have than to do something that will save a life."

Yarbrough said she once supported the death penalty but that the exonerations serve as a "painful and stirring reminder that death is an absolute penalty. Once imposed, there is no second chance, no reversal and no way to correct a mistake."

Exonerated former inmate Gordon "Randy" Steidl, who spent 17 years in prison, including 12 on death row, was among the death penalty opponents who praised Quinn.

"He made a decision today, a moral, righteous decision, when he realized that there are flaws in this system that almost took my life and 19 other men in Illinois," Steidl said.

Not everyone at the Capitol cheered, given the legislation cleared the General Assembly with only a few votes to spare in the waning days of a lame-duck session in January. Death penalty proponents already are seeking to reinstate capital punishment.

Rep. Jim Durkin, R-Western Springs, predicted Quinn's actions would haunt him if he plans to run for re-election in 2014.

Quinn chose to focus on the arguments lawmakers gave when they approved the ban. He also deflected questions on how he campaigned last fall as a death penalty supporter. Quinn had kept in place the moratorium first imposed by Republican adversary and predecessor Gov. George Ryan, who cleared death row in 2003 by commuting to life in prison the death sentences for more than 160 inmates.

But Quinn hesitated when asked to draw comparisons between his actions and those of Ryan, who is serving time in federal prison for corruption. The governor said the 2 each followed their consciences.

"I think God wants you to do it that way," Quinn said.

Source: Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2011


Quinn ends death row at Pontiac prison

Pontiac Correctional Center
Gov. Pat Quinn signaled the end of Pontiac Correctional Center's role as home to Illinois' death row Wednesday.

Although state prison officials are not sure what will happen to the 22 cells reserved for condemned prisoners, the governor's decision to abolish the death penalty and commute the sentences of the 15 men on who reside there will symbolically and physically alter the makeup of the 140-year-old lockup.

Quinn's landmark move also will end Dwight Correctional Center's role as the designated death row for women and eliminate Tamms Correctional Center as the home of the state's execution chamber, last used in 1999 when Andrew Kokoraleis was executed by lethal injection.

The formal abolition will go into effect on July 1, meaning death row will technically remain in place until then.

The 15 residents of the gallery whose sentences were commuted to life in prison without the possibility of release eventually will be moved into other units.

"I know they will stay in a maximum-security facility," said Illinois Department of Corrections spokeswoman Sharyn Elman.

John Maki, executive director of the John Howard Association, a prison watchdog group, was on a team surveying Pontiac on Jan. 11 -- the day the Illinois Senate approved the death penalty abolition.

He said condemned prisoners were curious about what the abolition would mean for their sentences, which are served in isolation from the general prison population.

Elman could provide no timetable for when the prisoners would be moved out of their current cells, but Maki said the inmates should be prepared for significant changes, including possibly having to share a cell with another inmate.

"Their life in prison arguably gets worse," Maki said.

At least one state lawmaker said Pontiac officials should be given clear directions on what to do with the inmates.

"Those correctional facilities need to know what to do with those death row inmates and transition them to wherever they will be housed to comply with the law as it stands now," said state Rep. Jason Barickman, R-Champaign, who represents Pontiac.

Elman said it is too early to know how the emptied space will be used. For the most part, the section set aside for condemned inmates looks similar to the rest of the 1,650-inmate facility.

"It's basically indistinguishable from other parts of the prison," said Maki.

There is no official space dedicated to a female version of death row at Dwight because there were no women sentenced to death at the time of Quinn's action.

If there were, however, Elman said they too would be separated by sight and sound from other inmates.

Source: Bloomington Pantagraph, March 9, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Kansas House Introduces Bill to Abolish the Death Penalty

The bill's being sponsored by the House's Corrections and Juvenile Justice Committee.

The Kansas House of Representatives introduced HB 2323, a bill to abolish the state’s death penalty. The House Corrections and Juvenile Justice Committee sponsored the bill.

HB 2323 will replace the Kansas death penalty with life in prison without parole as the sentence for the crime of aggravated murder.

“This legislation will enable Kansas law enforcement officials to use the existing sentence of life without parole to hold offenders accountable for their crimes and protect the public safety without the unacceptable risk of executing an innocent person,” said Donna Schneweis, the Board Chair of the Kansas Coalition Against the Death Penalty.

In Kansas capital cases to date, there have been well documented errors, including judicial error, jury misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, withheld evidence, jury instruction issues and ineffective assistance of counsel. The Kansas Supreme Court has vacated three death sentences due to such errors.

“The death penalty is rife with problems beyond those in the court room,” said Carolyn Zimmerman, of Topeka, whose father was murdered in January 1969.

“The death penalty continues to impact the victims’ families long after a crime has occurred. A capital trial only prolongs a family’s pain and trauma, and rarely brings the closure families long for,” said Zimmerman.

Last year, the Kansas Senate nearly voted to abolish the death penalty. The legislation failed on a 20-20 vote.

"States across the country are recognizing the flaws of the death penalty. This legislation is the next step to ending this broken, inconsistent policy in Kansas,” said Schneweis.

Source: WIBW News, February 13, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Monday, January 10, 2011

Police officials argue death penalty doesn't make us safer

Over the past decade, executions have dropped by more than 50 percent and the number of death sentences has steadily declined, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. As police and law enforcement officers with decades of experience in fighting crime in the United States and Europe, we believe that societies are better off without the death penalty. We recently came together in Washington, D.C., for the 1st international dialogue among law enforcement professionals about the death penalty and found important areas of agreement.

Deterrence
Europe has abandoned the death penalty, but European countries have lower murder rates and higher rates of solving homicides than the United States. In the United States, states with the death penalty generally have higher murder rates than states without it. For example, southern states have the highest murder rates and account for 82 % of all U.S. executions. The deterrence argument is weak and it goes against our experience investigating serious crimes: the majority of offenders do not think through the consequences of their actions. In fact, they do not think they will ever be caught.

The death penalty, as it is applied, is too random to effectively deter potential offenders. If you execute a contract killer, for example, it would not deter a terrorist. If you execute a terrorist, it would not deter a young man who breaks into a house, gets startled, and shoots the owner.

Closure
U.S. politicians sometimes argue that the death penalty is needed to deter the killing of police officers. But if one of us were murdered, we would not want the perpetrator to receive the death penalty. The most important thing would be taking care of our families and helping them heal. We have seen how painful it is for families to go through years of death penalty trials and appeals and that would be the last thing we would want for our own families. The idea that the death penalty provides "closure" for victims' families is a myth.

Innocence
Another myth is that only the guilty are executed. We can tell stories about times experienced officers were certain they had the right guy, only to find out later they were wrong. Even when police do their jobs professionally and in good faith, mistakes will be made and innocent people will be convicted. It is hard to imagine a greater tragedy. At least with life without parole, there is a chance to reopen cases if new evidence becomes available. Death is irreversible.

Costs
Especially as budgets tighten in the United States and around the world, the death penalty may be a system governments can no longer afford. The death penalty costs far more than the alternatives. In California, for example, the death penalty costs $125 million more -- every year -- than life without parole, which also takes the offender off the streets permanently. All of the money that states spend on the death penalty could be used to hire more police officers, train them better, solve cold cases, and prevent crimes from occurring in the first place. We should spend our limited resources on programs that work.

Europe vs U.S.
Europe has the same violent offenses that the United States has, but has found ways to protect its citizens without capital punishment. For example, Portugal abolished the death penalty in 1864 and has never seriously considered reinstating it. Even when the country experienced political violence and organized terrorism during a revolution in 1974, the death penalty was not brought back. Had the terrorists been sentenced to death, they might have become martyrs and the violence might have continued.

Do some murderers deserve the death penalty? Maybe so, but that is an emotional reaction. It is not the basis for creating public policy or finding the best ways to keep citizens safe. More states should follow New Jersey's lead, and the example of 15 U.S. states, repeal the death penalty, and adopt life without parole in its place. As a growing number of Americans recognize, life without parole is a harsh punishment, protects the public, and eliminates the risk of an irreversible mistake, while freeing up funds for more effective crime-fighting programs. This is a better way to serve victims' families and prevent violence.

Source: James Abbott is the police chief of West Orange, N.J., and served on the state's Death Penalty Study Commission. António Cluny is the senior attorney general and public prosecutor in Portugal. Bob Denmark is a 30-year veteran of the British police force and a former detective superintendent of Lancashire Constabulary, England. Ronald Hampton is the executive director of the National Black Police Association International Leadership Institute and a 23-year veteran of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, Opinion, Mercury News, January 9, 2011