Showing posts with label Netherlands. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Netherlands. Show all posts

Thursday, April 14, 2011

The Netherlands: 'More help for Dutch nationals facing death penalty'

The Netherlands is to become more proactive in helping Dutch nationals jailed in countries where they could face the death penalty, foreign affairs minister Uri Rosenthal is quoted as saying in the Telegraaf.

The news follows the execution of Dutch Iranian woman Zahra Bahrami earlier this year.

Some 2,500 Dutch nationals are being held in foreign prisons, of whom around 500 are in countries with the death penalty.

Source: dutchNews.nl, April 13, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Monday, April 4, 2011

A populist warning light?

A new opinion poll shows that Austrian, anti-immigrant, populist party FPÖ would end up on top if elections were held today, beating both the social democratic SPÖ and conservative ÖVP. There are of course multiple reasons for the party's rise, but we note that FPÖ leader Heinz-Christian Strachewhich last week slammed Austria's participation in, and the cost of, eurozone bail-outs. "Thank you, [Austrian Chancellor] Werner Faymannm," he said sarcastically.

In Finland, the "True Finns" party, under the leadership of Timo Soini (pictured), has seemingly come from nowhere and transformed itself into a full-scale political force. A recent opinion poll put it second, ahead of this month's national elections. Though not nearly as bad as FPÖ, it does run on a highly populist platform with a strong anti-euro flavour. The party was almost single-handedly responsible for derailing the EU deal on how to increase the size of the eurozone's bailout fund, the EFSF. The decision is now postponed until June, after the Finnish elections. And as Jan Sundberg, Professor at University of Helisnki puts it, "Portugal crashing would be a gift to the True Finns".

In the Netherlands, the government does not have a majority in Parliament, but has to rely on Geert Wilders' Party for Freedom, which is the third largest party in the country. Wilders has also spoken out against the euro-bailouts. So far, the Dutch government has relied on the other Dutch opposition parties to get its EU measures though parliament.

In France, far-right Front National leader Marine Le Pen is gaining popularity, and one poll even showed her ahead of all other candidates ahead of next year's Presidential elections. Le Pen has called for France to leave the eurozone, along with Spain, Greece and Portugal, saying:
"They promised us that this currency would bring growth and welfare, and what happened? People were destroyed, we are talking about a real tragedy. Look at what happened to Greece."
Again, there are numerous factors at work here - and we should be careful to over-simplify or generalise - but it's hard not to detect a worrying trend: four of the eurozone's main creditor countries (and incidentally net contributors to the EU budget), which are underwriting struggling euro governments' debt to the tune of hundreds of billions, are experiencing a dramatic surge in support for populist parties. These parties would not only reject the bail-outs and the Single Currency but also, in all likelihood, the EU itself.

So what about the big kid on the block: Germany?

Germany doesn't really have its own version of the populist parties we see in other parts of Europe - on the left, Die Linke might fit part of the bill, but it's still not quite the same. Therefore, there's no real political platform for the kind of aggressive anti-euro sentiments that we see in Austria for example (which also plays on anti-immigration and anti-incumbency) - and there's unlikely to be one in the immediate future.

It's clear, however, that German public opinion is growing increasingly wary of the direction of the euro. Slowly, these sentiments are beginning to trickle through to party politics. The motion which was passed by a near-unanimous German Parliament asking Merkel to backtrack on an agreement between eurozone leaders, is one example (though it shouldn't be overstated either). But there clearly is a vacuum in EU politics in terms of voicing alternative visions for the direction of the Single Currency and the EU - and a mismatch between public opinion and the political class.

Writing in FTD last week, Wolfgang Münchau - who, until recently, was the arch-optimist amongst eurozone commentators - argued that "a right-wing spot is free" in Germany. He suggested that the liberal FDP will fill the vacuum and turn into a 'eurosceptic' party. Perhaps. If so, the hope is that the FDP could transform itself into a sensible, EU reformist party, pushing for the revolutionary idea (yes, sarcasm) that the single currency and the EU should be based on sound economics and democracy. Such an outcome would benefit both Germany and Europe.

The fear, as ever, is that the vacuum will be filled by other, nastier political forces.

A Europe in which populist, anti-immigrant parties hold strong positions in creditor (or triple A countries), while far-left parties gain prominence in debtor nations such as Greece or Portugal, would really be the worst of all worlds.

But if Europe's mainstream politicians continue to stick their heads in the sand, and refuse to speak about the problems facing the eurozone - they should not be surprised if voters turn to the parties that do engage in some straight talking, however flawed or nasty such talk may be.

Mainstream political parties and their leaders got it spectacularly wrong on the euro in the past. Perhaps it's time to think about some more fundamental solutions to the eurozone's problems?

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Progress?


UK Chancellor George Osborne yesterday refused to sign off the EU budget for 2009 in a routine vote in Brussels. This was a purely symbolic - but still important - gesture to protest wasteful spending in the EU. A spokesperson for the Treasury said that
The Chancellor has put Europe on notice that we can't afford not to put Europe's house in order.
The UK government is talking up EU budget reform, which can come back and bite them if they fail to deliver (remember the budget freeze promised by Cameron, which sort of back-fired?), but is also showing political will to get something done. That's a good sign.

Osborne was joined by Sweden and the Netherlands in abstaining in the vote. The reason for the Dutch absention was, as the country's Finance Ministry bluntly put it, that "€2 billion has disappeared" from the EU budget, which strikes us as a pretty valid reason.

Last year only the Netherlands abstained from the budget vote, meaning that we're looking at progress this year.

With this rate, all member states will refuse to sign off the annual budget by 2022 or 2016 (depending on how optimistically you count).

We're not exactly holding our breath though.

Monday, February 14, 2011

Iran: Ahmadinejad government on death penalty spree

Onlookers at a public hanging,
Tehran, January 5, 2011
Source: Iran-Resist
"The radical Islamic government of Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is reportedly executing prisoners at an alarming rate, according to International Campaign for Human Rights. Iran is suspected of executing one person every eight hours. Since the beginning of 2011, Iran has executed 87 people on various charges." [According to this blog's own sources, at least 92 prisoners were executed in January 2011 alone. See here]

While the international news media and government officials are preoccupied with events occurring in Egypt, the Iranian government's execution of a Dutch-Iranian woman government officials claimed was involved in drug smuggling has created a firestorm in Amsterdam, Holland over the weekend.

Those who knew Miss Bahrami, 46, claim the drug charges were bogus, and police officials in The Netherlands say that she was originally arrested for participating in anti-government protests two years ago when civil unrest in Iran followed accusations of a corrupt presidential election.

After being arrested and processed on charges of sedition, the Iranian government allegedly changed the records to show Bahrami was arrested for cocaine smuggling and possession, a capital offense in that Islamist nation.

Uri Rosenthal, Holland's foreign minister, blasted government officials in Tehran for not granting the executed woman's relatives entry into Iran to bury Bahrami. Instead of turning over her remains to her relatives, the Iranian officials secretly took Bahrami's body more than 200 miles outside of the Iranian capital and held her last rites and burial ceremony without her relatives in attendance.

"This is a shocking fact which bears upon the regime which does not meet the normal standards of civilized behavior towards citizens and foreigners," Rosenthal said.

Bahrami, a naturalized Dutch citizen, was hanged on January 29 after being convicted of the drug offense. Iranian prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi alleges that an unspecified amount of cocaine was found in a search of her temporary residence during the country's national elections in 2009.

Her execution nine says ago prompted the Dutch government to freeze all contact with what it labeled a "barbarous regime."

Meanwhile, 2 American citizens who claim they accidentally wandered into Iran last year are still being held in Iran . While the government released their female companion, Sarah Shourd, 31, her boyfriend Shane Bauer, 27, and a friend, Josh Fattal, 27, remain captives accused of being foreign spies.

The radical Islamic government of Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is reportedly executing men and women at a shockingly high rate, according to officials with the International Campaign for Human Rights. The ICHR claims Iran executes at least three prisoners every 24 hours.

Many of those given the death penalty are political prisoners who oppose the rule of Islamic clerics in Iran.

According to Aaron Rhodes of International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran, "The Iranian Judiciary is on an execution binge orchestrated by the intelligence and security agencies."

Iranian judges are widely believed to lack independence and their decisions are frequently subordinated to the wishes of security agencies. Also, the actual number of prisoners executed in Iran is difficult to verify but many believe is higher than is reported.

Iranian prisons are often the scenes of mass execution such as in January when more than a hundred people were executed in a mass hanging in just one Iranian prison, according to International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran. The high rate of executions in Iran has prompted the United Nations order Iran to halt its execution of prisoners, but Iran continues its hardline approach to criminal justice and law enforcement.

Even Iranians with dual citizenships or permanent residency abroad have been arrested, sentenced to death by Iranian courts, and then summarily executed.

In a case that outraged the world's journalists in 2003, an Iranian-Canadian journalist taken into custody by the secret police was later murdered by Iranian security agents while in a Tehran prison, according to Canadian police officials. The reporter, Zahra Kazemi, was brutally tortured and sexually assaulted by her interrogators.

Source: Jim Kouri, CPP, formerly 5th Vice-President, is currently a Board Member of the National Association of Chiefs of Police; The Examiner, February 13, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Iran lashes out at West over executions

TEHRAN – Iran lashed out at Western nations on Tuesday, saying a spate of executions in the Islamic republic was none of their business, as it defended the hanging of an Iranian-Dutch woman.

Iran has hanged 67 people so far this year, according to an AFP tally based on Iranian media reports, and foreign ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said 80 percent of those hanged were drug smugglers.

"If Iran does not combat drugs, Europe and the West will be hurt," Mehmanparast told reporters at his weekly press conference when asked to react to Western criticisms against Iran for the recent jump in executions.

"Our people are amazed by the humanitarian gesture that some countries adopt," he said.

"Why do they make such noise over a person executed for smuggling or someone on trial over adultery, while they do not defend thousands of Palestinians who innocently die?"

US State Department spokesman Philip Crowley said on Monday that Washington was "deeply concerned that Iran continues to deny its citizens their human rights."

"We are particularly troubled by the recent execution of Dutch-Iranian national Zahra Bahrami, who was denied access to Dutch consular officials."

Given the current rate of around two executions a day since January 1, the number of hangings in Iran is set to exceed the 179 reportedly executed in 2010.

In 2009, the last year for which complete statistics are available, Iran executed 388 people, according to international human rights groups, making it second to China in the number of people it put to death.

Bahrami, 46, an Iranian-born naturalized Dutch citizen, was reportedly arrested in December 2009 after joining an anti-government protest while visiting relatives in the Islamic republic.

She was later charged with drug trafficking for which she was hanged on Saturday. Following her execution, the Netherlands froze diplomatic contacts with Iran.

"Her execution is one of dozens carried out in recent weeks amid serious questions about the motives of the Iranian government and whether these prisoners were granted their rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights," Crowley said.

"The United States urges the Iranian government to halt these executions and to guarantee the rights of its citizens in accordance with its international obligations."

Human rights group say China leads the world in executions. The death penalty is also practiced in the United States, where 46 convicts were executed in 2010, according to the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington.

Mehmanparast said Iran did not consider Bahrami as a Dutch national as the Islamic republic's constitution does not recognise dual nationality.

"Iranian-Dutch national is a forged term. Our constitution does not recognise dual nationality. It is totally unacceptable that Dutch officials interfere in an Iranian national's case," he said.

"We do not allow any country to do that. The case (of Bahrami) had strong evidence. The defendant had clearly confessed to buying, selling, importing and exporting drugs," he said, adding the Netherlands had been hasty in reacting to Bahrami's hanging as it was unaware of her drug smuggling activities.

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton also condemned Bahrami's execution, saying on Monday she was "dismayed" Iranian authorities denied Bahrami access to consular officials before her execution and failed to ensure a "fair and transparent judicial process."

Concerned about a "steep increase" in executions, Ashton wants Iran to "halt all pending executions immediately and declare a moratorium on the death penalty," her spokeswoman Maja Kocijanci told reporters in Brussels.

Source: AFP, Feb. 1, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Monday, January 31, 2011

Iran condemns 2 to death over porn sites

Iranian courts on Sunday sentenced 2 people to death for running porn sites, prosecutor general Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi said, quoted on the Islamic republic's official IRNA news agency.

"2 administrators of porn sites have been sentenced to death in 2 different (court) branches and (the verdicts) have been sent to the supreme court for confirmation," Dolatabadi said, without naming the 2 convicts.

Last December, Canada expressed concern over the reported death sentence handed down to an Iranian-born Canadian resident for allegedly designing an adult website.

Saeed Malekpour, 35, was convicted of "designing and moderating adult content websites," "agitation against the regime" in Tehran, and "insulting the sanctity of Islam," according to an online campaign calling for his release.

Malekpour was detained in Iran after returning in 2008 to visit his ailing father. He was sentenced to death in December.

The Netherlands froze contacts with Tehran after Saturday's hanging of an Iranian-Dutch woman for drug smuggling, having initially been arrested for taking part in anti-government protests.

Iran, China, Saudi Arabia and United States have the highest numbers of executions each year. Adultery, murder, drug trafficking, homosexuality and other major crimes are all punishable by death in the Islamic republic.

Source: Agence France-Presse, January 31, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Iranian-Dutch citizen Zahra Bahrami executed in Tehran

Zahra Bahrami
Iran Human Rights, January 28: Only one day after "the European Union called upon the Iranian authorities to halt all pending executions immediately", Iranian authorites executed an Iranian-EU citizen.

The Iranian-Dutch citizen Zahra Bahrami, who was arrested in the wake of the Ashura (December 27, 2009) protests was hanged in Tehran’s Evin prison early this morning.

Zahra Bahrami was charged with Moharebeh (war against the God) by branch 15 of Tehran Revolutionary Court on August 16, 2010. Her charges included: “acting against national security, propaganda against the establishment, Moharebeh, and membership in the Monarchist Association”.

Mrs. Bahrami was also charged with drug trafficking, a charge that many believe was fabricated against her. Her family have stated these charges are false and that Mrs. Bahrami have accepted the drug charges under pressure.

In the beginning of January 2011 Mrs. Bahrami was sentenced to death for the drug charges by the revolutionary court. It was believed that her trial regarding her participation in the Ashura proetsts would be held within the coming months.

But she was hanged early this morning convicted of "drug trafficking".

The state run Iranian news agency Fars reproted that "A drug dealer by the name "Zahra Bahrami" daughter of Ali was hanged in Tehran’s Evin prison this morning". According to Fars: "Zahra Bahrami was involved in smugling of cocaine from the Netherlands to Iran". The report also stated that "Mrs. Bahrami has previously been arrested for "security related charges and 420 grams of cocaine and 420 grams of opium was discovered when her appartment was searched.

Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, the spokesperson of Iran Human Rights, strongly condemned Mrs. Bahrami’s execution and said: " We believe Mrs. Bahrami’ trial has been unfair, she has been subjected to ill-treatment in the prison and today she became victim of the Iranian regime’s terror machinery". He added: "We hope the Dutch government and the EU will take this case seriously and conduct an investigation to find the truth about what happened about Mrs. Bahrami".

According to the official reports more than 111 prisoners, among them 5 political prisoners, have been executed in Iran.

Source: Iran Human Rights, January 29, 2011


Daughter of Ashura Death Row Prisoner: Mom’s False Confessions Based on Promise of Release

Interview conducted by Masih Alinejad

Zahra Bahrami is a woman arrested in the wake of the 2009 Ashura protests (December 27, 2009), but was sentenced to death on drug charges. Her daughter, Banafsheh Nayebpour has objected to the attempts made [by Iranian regime authorities] to depoliticize the case and to present it as dealing with a common offence. She said, “The death sentence issued to my mother is completely political and I implore people, the media, and all human rights activists to not believe the fabricated and trumped-up charge of ‘possession of narcotics’ [levelled against my mother]. The accusation is meant to distract and deceive people to believe the reason behind the death sentence is ‘possession of drugs’ so they refrain from supporting and helping us.”

Zahra Bahrami is an Iranian-Dutch citizen who, according to her family, was violently arrested on Shademan Street in Tehran two days after the Ashura protests. She was later sentenced to death by the Revolutionary Court on the charge of ‘possession of narcotics’, and all her belongings were confiscated.

According to some families of prisoners of conscience, in the course of the 2009 Ashura protests and prior, many prisoners received politically-motivated death sentences on non-political charges. The sentences for some defendants have been overturned, while the sentences for others [remain in the] Clemency and Pardon commission, and the rest are in the appeals stage. Meanwhile, many families of [political] prisoners request from the public and human rights organizations to help halt the execution of death sentences.

Elaheh Latifi, the sister of Habib Latifi, the Kurdish activist whose death sentence was temporarily postponed, told Jaras, “We request from human rights organizations and anybody who can do something to help [us], but I still think that we should help my brother from inside Iran [rather than relying solely on outside help].”

Roudabeh Akbari, Jafar Kazemi’s wife, who was sentenced to death on the charge of “Moharebeh [Enmity with God] through collaboration with and ties to the People’s Mujahedin of Iran Organization (PMOI), told Jaras, “We [request] the help of all our compatriots so my husband will not be executed…By executing my husband, his children and I will be executed too…. It is not fair to execute my husband who was busy with his life and had no political activities only for the political tendencies of my son.”

Fatehmeh Eftekhari, Saeed Malekpour’s wife, whose husband has also been sentenced to death on security offense charges, told Jaras, “The fact that the interrogators, in [their attempt to] extract confessions from a defendant on the charge ‘immorality and indecency in cyber space’, stripped him and threatened him with [rape] is appalling. What religious or legal justification exists for employing such methods? Our people are very enlightened.”

Banafsheh Nayebpour told Jaras, “They have levelled drug charges against my mother, an artist who does not even smoke [cigarettes].”

An Interview with Banafsheh Nayebpour:

Jaras- Ms. Nayebpour, the news of your mother’s death sentence has received extended media coverage. Can you please tell us why, since December 2009 when your mother was arrested, you did not talk to the media about the case until now?

Banafsheh Nayebpour (BN)- Initially, after my mother’s arrest, there was no information available on her whereabouts. I even thought that my mother had left Iran. I was really worried. I wanted to know where my mother was and why she was not contacting us. Three months after [her disappearance], my mother contacted us from prison.

Jaras- After you found out that your mother was arrested, did you still opt for silence? I would like to know whether there was a specific reason behind the family’s silence?

BN- Yes, I was threatened into silence. After we found out, I tried to contact the Dutch government through the Netherlands’s embassy [in Tehran], the Dutch media, and my mother’s lawyer in the Netherlands. However, [agents from Iran's] Ministry of Intelligence threatened me a few times and made me [promise] to not give any interviews to the Dutch media and to not have any contacts with the Dutch embassy and government under any circumstances. I wrote and signed a written promise to not talk about it. The [agents] told me I could be arrested if I gave interviews. A week after the last time I was threatened, I received a phone call from the Prosecutor’s office. Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi [the Tehran Prosecutor] along with his secretary took me to Evin prison. He said to me in front of my mother, “If you do not give any interviews, I promise to do my best to secure the release of your mother.” I, in turn, promised to not give any interviews. But, not only was my mother not released, but she received the death sentence as well.

Jaras- Did you bring this matter up with the Prosecutor at a later date?

BN- Actually, then, Mr. Dolatabadi told me that if I needed any help regarding the case, I could come to the Prosecutor’s office and ask to see him and enter directly. However, after the meeting when he asked to see me, every time I went, he did not see me and nobody answered my inquiries either. Then, they issued a death sentence for my mother. It was after the [issuing of the sentence] that I decided to give interviews, because they did not keep their promise. The Prosecutor had even promised my mother that if she confessed, she would be released. My mother replied, “Alright, just to save myself from these conditions, I will say whatever you want and I will confess.” Now, my mom really regrets [her decision to confess].

Jaras- Did your mother also give televised self-incriminating confessions?

BN- It was the beginning of her detention, around nine months ago, when Channel 6 [of Iran state TV] aired a program that showed my mother making self-incriminating confessions. I was extremely upset. I even told Mr. Dolatabadi that [the false charges] attributed to my mother are shameful. My mother is an artist and she studied music in the Netherlands for a few years. My mother’s confessions completely demonstrated that she was under duress and torture. She was told that if she gave [a televised] interview, she would be released. Even Mr. Dolatabadi told me, “Yes, I did tell your mother that she would be released if she gave a televised interview, however, later on, certain circumstances arose that prevented us from releasing her.”

Jaras- You mean you had a meeting with Mr. Dolatabadi and he mentioned this point himself?

BN- Yes, I talked to the Prosecutor and he questioned why I do not trust him. I responded, “Mr. Dolatabadi, why should I trust you? You promised my mother that you would release her if she made self-incriminating televised confessions; however, months have passed [since my mom's interview] and you have not released her.” He replied, “She was supposed to be released, but then some problems arose that prevented us from releasing her.”

Jaras- What is your assessment of the fact that the drug charges in your mother’s case were processed, but there has been no mention of the other charges?

BN- It is interesting that my mother was just transferred to the general ward of Evin prison a few months ago. Initially, she was held in ward 209 [controlled by the Ministry of Intelligence]. This demonstrates that my mother’s case is completely political. If the drug charge is much more serious than the other charges, then why was she held in ward 209 in the first months of her detention?

My mother’s case is completely political. My mother was basically arrested on a political charge. They levelled so many accusations of a political nature against her like “acting against national security”, “propaganda against the regime”, “ties to [the proscribed opposition group] the Monarchist Association”, and “Moharebeh [Enmity with God]“. They brought up the fabricated drug charge to distract and deviate the public [to think that her] case is not political.

Jaras- How was your mother arrested?

BN- My mother took part in the Ashura demonstrations [on December 27, 2009], but she had no ties to any association or group. My mother was arrested two days later on the street. She was with her friends [in a car] when a Ministry of Intelligence vehicle ordered them to stop [driving]. My mother explained that they pulled her hair, dragged her out of the car, and arrested her. All the people who were with her were released within the first month. Then, they accused my mother of forming an opposition group. Another accusation they levelled against my mother was ‘membership in the Monarchist Association’. However, the Monarchist Association has issued a statement that Ms. Zahra Bahrami had no ties with the association. Honestly, my mother had no ties to them. [Regime authorities] accused my mother of serious political offences like ‘forming an opposition group’ and ‘Moharebeh’; the latter [could] carry a death sentence. Despite this, suddenly the drug charges surfaced as the reason behind the death penalty. [This was done to] keep everyone’s hands off the case.

Jaras- What actions did your mother’s lawyer take for her defense?

BN- Ms. [Nasrin] Sotoudeh was a very good lawyer for my mother, but she was unfortunately arrested. She defended my mother bravely and was the only person who gave an interview to a Dutch newspaper and said that the charges related to ‘possession of narcotics’ are trumped-up and fabricated. I think because she spread the news and defended her clients it landed her in trouble (I.e. imprisonment].

Jaras- Are you pursuing the case through another lawyer at the moment?

BN- Yes, however, I was hoping to hire an experienced lawyer so that (s)he could offer an effective defense for my mother and save her life. I talked to one of the good lawyers, but we were unable to afford the fees he wanted to charge. I am alone here and I do not have the financial means to pay for the legal expenses.

Jaras- Did you seek assistance to raise this amount?

BN- First, I went to visit the Prosecutor, because [regime agents] confiscated all my mother’s property including her car and home. I told the Prosecutor’s Office to at least provide us with a certain amount of money from the confiscated properties so that we could hire a good lawyer capable of defending my mother. [Upon their rejection to our request], we contacted the Dutch government.

Jaras- Did the government of the Netherlands offer you any assistance in this matter?

BN- Initially, the Dutch government did not accept to help us because they probably did not think that my mother would be issued a death sentence. When the death sentence was issued, they decided to help, but they have not provided any assistance yet. Our situation is very complex. I am alone here. I do not even know if my voice is being heard by anybody who is in a position do something to save my mother.

Jaras- May I ask about the other family members?

BN- My 22 year old brother cannot do anything. I am married. My father and husband could probably help me emotionally, but all our hope was relying on my mother’s properties that were confiscated. So, we are not even able to hire a good lawyer to save her life.

Jaras- Do you have anything else to tell people and the authorities?

BN- To be honest, when I think about it, people took part in the protests for Mousavi and Karroubi, but did Mousavi and Karroubi offer any assistance to the people? My mother had no affiliation with any political party or group. I hope [regime authorities] do not keep the people’s hands off the case because of the fabricated drug charge. Our entire family is shocked [by the drug charges], and they cannot believe how a person who did not even smoke can be sentenced to death for the possession of narcotics.

Most importantly, last week, the Ambassador of Holland said that Iran’s Ambassador in the Netherlands told him that the charge against my mother is ‘possession of one kilogram of cocaine’. However, in my mother’s case file it says ‘about half a kilogram of narcotics’. By giving such contradictory accounts, [the regime] is demonstrating that my mother’s case is political. They are trying to ensure that we are left alone so no one would be able to help us. I wish human rights organizations and the people hear our voice.

Persian Report by Rahe Sabz (Jaras)
Translation by Siavosh Jalili, Persian2English.com

Source: Persian2English, January 18, 2011


Dutch freeze contacts with Iran after execution

The Dutch government said it was freezing contacts with Iran after the hanging of an Iranian-Dutch woman. The woman was executed for drug smuggling after initially being arrested for taking part in protests in 2009.

The Netherlands says it is cutting off contacts with Iran in the wake of the hanging of an Iranian-Dutch woman in the Islamic republic which the Hague decried as an "act committed by a barbarous regime."

The freeze concerns all official contacts between diplomats and civil servants, said foreign ministry spokesman Bengt van Loosdrecht.

Iran hanged the woman for selling and possessing drugs, ignoring pleas by the Netherlands which had sought details about the case.

Bahrami was born in Iran but later acquired Dutch citizenship "A woman smuggler named Zahra Bahrami, daughter of Ali, has been hanged today for the possession and selling of narcotics," the Iranian news agency Mehr reported on Saturday, quoting the court.

The New York-based rights group International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran quoted the 46-year-old woman's daughter as saying the drug charges were fabricated.

The group said the Iranian-born naturalized Dutch citizen was arrested for taking part in protests against the government in December 2009 while visiting relatives in the Islamic republic.

Drug smuggling charges

The Iranian prosecutor's office confirmed on Saturday that Zahra Bahrami had been arrested for "security crimes."

Elaborating on her alleged drug smuggling, the office said Bahrami had used her Dutch connections to smuggle narcotics into Iran.

"The convict, a member of an international drug gang, smuggled cocaine to Iran using her Dutch connections and had twice shipped and distributed cocaine inside the country," it said.

During a search of her house, authorities found 450 grams of cocaine and 420 grams of opium, the prosecutor's office said, adding that investigations revealed she had sold 150 grams of cocaine in Iran.

"The revolutionary court sentenced her to death for possessing 450 grams of cocaine and participating in the selling of 150 grams of cocaine," it said.

Netherlands was refused access

Bahrami was also accused of belonging to the People's Mujahedin of Iran (PMOI), classified as a terrorist organization responsible for killing several Iranian officials in the last 30 years.

2 members of the group were hanged earlier this week in Tehran for their involvement in protests in 2009.

On Saturday, the Dutch government summoned Iran's ambassador to brief the government about the hanging.

The Netherlands had been seeking details about Bahrami's case and had accused the Iranian authorities of refusing the Dutch embassy access to the prisoner because Iran did not recognize her dual nationality.

Wave of executions

Bahrami's execution takes the total number of people hanged in Iran so far this year to 66, according to media reports.

The spate of executions has drawn criticism from Catherine Ashton, Europe's chief diplomat in talks between world powers and Iran over Tehran's controversial nuclear program.

"The European Union is deeply concerned about the use of the death penalty in Iran. Executions are taking place at an alarming rate," she said on Thursday.

Ashton's statement came after Iranian state media on Thursday reported the hanging of ten drug traffickers.

"In addition, abhorrent practices such as public executions and suspension hanging continue to be used, in contravention of Iran's international obligations," added Ashton, restating the EU policy of global opposition to capital punishment.

Source: Deutsche Welle, January 30, 2011


Distraught, Bahrami's Daughter Demands: "How is it possible that she was executed?!"

A shocked and emotional Banafsheh Nayebpour, daughter of Iranian-Dutch citizen, Zahra Bahrami, who, according to a Fars News Agency report, was executed in the early morning hours of Saturday, 29 January 2010, talked to the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran today. She said people have been calling her for the past hour to verify the news of her mother's death. "How is such a thing possible? We had requested clemency, and we have not yet received a reply. They have not reviewed my mother’s other case, either. How is it possible that she was executed?" she said in disbelief.

Zahra Bahrami's daughter was informed of her mother's execution through phone calls from her friends and relatives on Saturday at around 4:00 p.m. "I called her lawyer. She had not been informed, either. I don't know where to go now, of whom to seek information. Nobody is answering me now, because it’s past business hours. This means that my mother died this morning, when I was sleeping," she said.

"Shouldn't they have informed her family and lawyer before executing her? We should have gone to see her before her execution. Is it so easy–that my mother is no longer in this world? Did I not have any right to see her before her execution?" said a distraught Banafesheh Nayebpour.

Iranian-Dutch citizen, Zahra Bahrami, who was arrested a few days after the 2009 Ashura Day (27 December 2009) protests on charges of participating in street gatherings, was accused of drug trafficking sometime later and sentenced to death. During her court trial, Ms. Bahrami said that the confessions she had made in prison had been extracted under duress and by force. She retracted her confessions in court. An informed source told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran that during Zahra Bahrami's detention, her interrogation team was the Iranian Intelligence Ministry's Anti-Espionage Team. According to the said source, during her first few weeks of detention in prison, Zahra Bahrami endured severe physical and psychological torture. She told her daughter several times that she had been made to give fake confessions under torture.

During an interview earlier this month, Zahra Bahrami's daughter told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran: "My mother is a citizen of the Netherlands. They probably leveled this accusation against her in order to cut the Dutch government's reach [into the case]. They have previously waged such unfounded charges against others, too. But my mother is a lonely woman without anyone, so they think they can do this to her. They know she has no one to help her."

Source: Iran Human Rights, January 30, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Iranian-Dutch citizen Zahra Bahrami sentenced to death in Iran

Zahra Bahrami
Iran has issued a death sentence on drug-related charges for Zahra Bahrami, the Iranian-Dutch citizen who was arrested in the protests of December 2009. The court sentence also includes “confiscation of her possessions, car and house.”

Jinoose Sharif Razi, Bahrami’s lawyer told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran that her client is charged for two separate cases. The first is connected with her arrest during Ashura Day anti-government protests and the second is a charge of keeping drugs in her home.

Sharif Razi reports that they have currently only processed the file on drug charges and adds: “Since the amount of drugs discovered at her home is over a certain limit, she has been issued the death penalty.”

Bahrami’s lawyer also indicated that her client denies having any drugs at her home. Her sentence has not been confirmed yet and has been sent to the Chief Prosecutor of Iran for further deliberation.

According to this report, 400g of cocaine and 400g of opium were found in Bahrami’s home and according to Iranian law, carrying over 30g of heroine can carry the death penalty. In terms of opium, however, over 20 kg is the limit that can justify the death sentence.

According to Bahrami’s lawyer, drug charges are usually processed with greater urgency. The court sentence on drug charges cannot be appealed but are instead sent to the Chief Prosecutor for more deliberation and finalization.

Zahra Bahrami is also facing the charge of “enmity with God” in connection with her arrest on Ashura Day in December 2009.

Uri Rosenthal, Dutch foreign minister has called on the Iranian embassy to clarify Zahra Bahrami’s situation. He declared grave concern regarding the death sentence which was announced in Dutch media yesterday.

The foreign ministry issued a statement maintaining that together with the Dutch embassy in Iran, they are following up on the case to attain "information, the opportunity to provide consular assistance and a fair trial."

In the past two weeks, 22 people have been hanged in Iran for charges ranging from “enmity against God, armed robbery, carrying drugs and murder.”

After China, Iran holds the record for the highest number of executions in the world.

Source: radiozamaneh, January 6, 2011


The Hague is Bahrami’s last hope

“Too little, too late.” That is how one human rights activist describes the Dutch government’s offer to help Iranian-born Dutch citizen Zahra Bahrami. Ms Bahrami has been sentenced to death by a court in Iran on charges of the possession and sale of drugs. The only remaining hope for Bahrami is in the hands of the Dutch Foreign Ministry.

Sadegh Nageshkar is an Iranian citizen living in the Netherlands, and working for the NGO Human Rights Activist for Democracy in Iran. He says Dutch offers of legal assistance for Ms Bahrami come too late: "It's too late because there is no way Ms Bahrami can appeal. The case has been closed."

Innocence
In court, Ms Bahrami maintained her innocence, recanting a nationally televised confession. She says the confession was made under coercion. According to Iranian law, the possession of 30 grams or more of cocaine is a crime punishable by death, with no possibility for appeal. Iranian authorities claim Ms Bahrami had 450 grams of cocaine in her possession at the time of her arrest, in addition to 400 grams of opium.

The drugs charges against Ms Bahrami came on top of charges of membership in an armed opposition group, for which she could also face the death penalty. That portion of her trial must still take place.

As for the death penalty for possession of drugs, Ms Bahrami does have one more chance to get her punishment commuted in the Iranian legal system, through the co-called Committee of Forgiveness. If she is willing to admit to her crime, she can appeal to the committee for forgiveness. It is rare, if not unprecedented, for the committee to grant forgiveness in cases involving drugs.

Precedent
The Dutch government says it has attempted to provide Ms Bahrami assistance, in the interest of trying to make sure she gets a fair trial, but has been prevented by the Iranian authorities, who do not recognize her Dutch citizenship.

A recent – and disappointing - precedent for Ms Bahrami’s case is that of Abullah al Mansouri, another Iranian national who became a Dutch citizen. Al Mansouri fled Iran in 1988 after a conviction on charges of terrorism and settled in the Netherlands. He was arrested in 2006 while visiting Syria, and tried again in Iran. He was sentenced in 2009 to 30 years in prison.

Dutch authorities were also frustrated in their attempts to assist Al Mansouri, once again because Iran does not recognize the assumption of a second nationality.

Disappointment
Ms Bahrami feels she has not received a fair trial. Her daughter, Banafshef Najebpour, told Radio Netherlands how much her mother had counted on the Netherlands to help assure she got a fair trial. Ms Najebpour broke down as she recounted her disappointment in the Dutch government. She said, "The last time I have seen my mother was Tuesday last week. She was doing quite well, and she was certain that she would receive help from the Dutch government because she knows she hasn’t done anything wrong. But we didn’t get any help."

The Dutch Foreign Affairs Minister Uri Rosenthal reacted in writing to the news of Ms Bahrami’s sentence. He says Dutch authorities are using every possible opportunity to bring up the subject with Iran.

The case of Ms Bahrami is an early test for Mr Rosenthal, who has been foreign minister for just a few months. He has already come under criticism for not prioritizing human rights in Dutch foreign policy.

Dutch politicians still have confidence in Rosenthal’s diplomatic capabilities. Coskun Çörüz, MP for the ruling Christian Democrat party, has called on Minister Rosenthal to do everything he can to make sure Ms Bahrami’s sentence is not carried out.

Time for pressure
Iranian activist Sadegh Nageshkar agrees. He says the only chance now to have Ms Bahrami’s sentence commuted is by applying political pressure. The legal process, says Negeshkar, has run its course.

Source: Radio Netherlands Worldwide, January 6, 2011


Lawyer Confirms Death Sentence for Iranian-Dutch Protestor

Jinoos Sharif Razi, lawyer to Iranian-Dutch citizen, Zahra Bahrami, who was arrested during the Ashura Day Protests in 2009 (27 December 2009), talked to the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran about her client’s recent death sentence. “Ms. Bahrami has two charges. Her first charge is related to her arrest on Tehran streets on Ashura Day, but her other charge is related to her possession of drugs at her home. At this time the court has only reviewed her drug possession case and as the amount of drugs allegedly found in her home was more than the legal amount, she has been sentenced to death. The verdict from the lower court has been forwarded to the Prosecutor’s Office and we are waiting to see what the Prosecutor’s opinion is, and whether he would confirm or reject it,” said Sharif Razi.

Bahrami rejected charges of drug possession in court. She was arrested on 27 December 2009 in Tehran. After a while, in addition to being charged with “rioting” on that day, she was further charged with possession of drugs in her home. Based on the ruling from Branch 15 of the Revolutionary Courts, on the charge of “possession of drugs,” she has been sentenced to death, confiscation of assets, property, automobile, and cash. Her first charge of participating in the Ashura Day protests and moharebeh, enmity with God, has not been reviewed yet.

Zahra Bahrami’s lawyer, Jinoos Sharif Razi, told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran that she was served with Bahrami’s verdict ten days ago. “Drug-related cases are now reviewed in one stage, and they are treated with urgency. These types of charges have a different process. When the lower court issues its ruling, the ruling is sent to the Prosecutor’s Office and the Prosecutor would either confirm or reject the ruling. But drug-related cases are no longer sent to appeals courts,” said Sharif Razi.

Regarding whether or not Zahra Bahrami’s death sentence could be carried out without reviewing her other charge, Sharif Razi replied: “Yes, because according to the law, for the amount of drugs she possessed the punishment is death. Even if she is acquitted from the Ashura Day “rioting” charge, which I don’t believe she will be, possessing that much drugs could lead to the execution by itself.”

Jinoos Sharif Razi said ”I have been involved in this case for nearly two months now. All I can say is that this was a very strange case for me; especially as Ms. Bahrami refuted all charges made against her and her prior confessions about the drugs. This case is very complex and dangerous and my only hope is that she receives clemency and is treated with Islamic mercy. That’s my only hope,” said Sharif Razi.

Asked about suspicions that possession of drugs may be a fabricated charge in Zahra Bahrami’s case, her lawyer said: “I really can’t say anything about this, as I entered the case very late. I was not present during the arrest, nor at the time of interrogations, and as I don’t have any reasons, I cannot express an opinion about this, either. I can only say that Ms. Bahami herself brought up the issue of the fabrication during the first trial session and denied possessing drugs. These statements were completely different from her prior confessions.”

Bahrami’s lawyer told the Campaign that her client had made several short trips to Iran after the elections. Regarding the prisoner’s charge of “contact with [pro-Royalist] group, Anjoman-e Padeshahi-e Iran,” Bahrami’s lawyer said: “This charge is only based on her own confessions and there is no other evidence for this other than Ms. Bahrami’s confession. But she, herself, has confessed that she was in touch with this group in London years ago, and after a short while she realized that they were swindlers, as she had supported them financially, and after a while she learned about their fraud. But then she did her best to tell others about this group. She even went to the Iranian Embassy in London to report this story, which they seemingly ignored.”

According to her case file, inside Zahra Bahrami’s home, security forces claimed to have discovered 400 grams of cocaine, and 400 grams of opium. According to the law, possessing more than 30 grams of heroin will have the death penalty. Regarding opium, however, possessing more than 20 kilograms of the substance would lead to the death penalty.

Friday, October 1, 2010

Which Coalition is tougher on EU: NL or UK?

The Dutch Liberals and Christian Democrats yesterday presented their proposal for a coalition agreement, allowing the two parties to form a minority government (supported in parliament by Geert Wilders' uber-populist PVV party).

The agreement still needs to be approved by the Christian Democrat's party congress tomorrow, but it sheds some light on how people (and their elected representatives) in one of the founding member states have started to think about the European Union.

In fact, the Europe section of the agreement - see here and here - bears striking resemblances to the coalition pact agreed a few months ago in the UK.

For example, the Dutch pact says:

European spending, policy development and transfer of competences to the European level cannot happen unhindered...With the Lisbon treaty...the limits for transfers of national competences to the EU have been reached. In the existing context the EU should function in an optimal way and at the service of the citizen. The attention should primarily go to fiscal soberness, promoting economic growth, improving legal and security cooperation and make external policy more effective.
So just like the British government, the Dutch one promises no more transfer of powers. Incidentally, this could amount to another "obstacle" for German demands for Treaty change in addition to those already possibly existing in Ireland (legal referendum requirement) and Austria (political referendum requirement). Although a Treaty change to introduce a state insolvency procedure may actually win broad support as taxpayers in the Netherlands could stand to gain, and it could make the eurozone fairer.

On the EU budget, the agreement states:

Reform of the EU budget is necessary, meaning that the contributions by the member states need to become more balanced and more transparent. The cabinet will make an effort for a substantial reduction in Dutch contributions to the EU in the negotiations on the upcoming financial perspective.
In fact, incoming PM Mark Rutte has said that the coalition will demand a €1 billion reduction in the country’s yearly €7 billion contribution to the EU budget, in addition to keeping its current €1 billion rebate from the budget in place.

Similar position to the British, although this looks like an even tougher negotiation stance than that of the UK coalition at this point.

In regards to existing EU laws, the Dutch agreement says:

Where national policy is limited by legal borders, the Netherlands will make an effort within the EU or any other context to change treaties, directives or other agreements.
And specifically with regards to immigration and asylum:

The cabinet will take initiatives to adapt EU directives and if there appears to be no alternatives for important measures, in consultation with other member states it will seek to modify the Treaties.
The focus on immigration laws (and an implicit swipe at enlargement earlier in the document) could well reflect the murky influence Wilders will now have over Dutch politics. But it's interesting to note that the Dutch coalition agreement - similarly to pre-election Tory pledges - include the desire to re-negotiate existing laws and powers, including possibly Treaty changes. Also here, the Dutch Coalition agreement seems to go further than its British counterpart.

All in all, the Dutch coalition agreement strikes us as more 'radical' than the Tory-Lib Dem one - who would have thought that a few months ago?